배아연구와 불법행위책임

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently, many nations said “yes” to human embryonic stem cell research, signing an executive order to permit funding for the research in the mame of achieving health and life of humankind. Human Embryo Research is permitted by our Bioethics & Biosafety Act. But, illegal research cannot be divorced from civil liability since it requires the destruction of eggs of fertilized eggs and personal rights of embryo-creator. After all, though we allow to do research embryo, we should control the capacity of abuse of embryo research for embryo-creator. If research violate the law(Bioethics & Biosafety Act or Civil Law, etc), it comes to a delict by pecuniary loss and non-pecuniary loss. When it comes to pecuniary loss, Human Embryo is not body but special property. Supreme Court maintained a stance that mental suffering is generally deemed as compensable for damages for the loss of property where a person's property right is invaded by a tort or non-performance of obligation. Thus, where mental suffering occurs, which cannot be compensated by recovery of property losses, the situation must be a special circumstance and the injured could claim consolation money for such losses only if the offender knew or would have known of such special circumstances(Supreme Court Decision 96Da31574 delivered on Nov, 26, 1996, etc.). That is to say, Supreme Court regards mental suffering through person's property right invaded by a tort as damages that have arisen through special circumstances. According to Civil law article 393 (2), the injured could claim consolation money for such losses only if only if the offender had foreseen or could have foreseen such circumstances. Also our court will solve through damages for non-pecuniary loss by complementary function of consolation money in that pecuniary loss could be difficult to valuate.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 들어가는 말
• II. 위법성 인정 여부: 배아연구의 한계
• 1. 실정법상 한계
• 2. 사회질서상 한계
• 3. 비교법적 검토
• III. 침해법익
• 1. 배아 자체에 대한 침해
• 2. 배아생성자의 법익침해
• IV. 배상되는 손해의 종류 및 손해배상의 범위
• 1. 재산적 손해
• 2. 정신적 손해
• V. 맺는 말
• 참고문헌
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이동훈, "헌법학개론" 도서출판 예응 2005

2 정종섭, "헌법학" 박영사 2007

3 전광석, "한국헌법론" 법문사 2004

4 金天秀, "태아의 법적 지위" 한국비교사법학회 10 (10): 21-64, 2003

5 김은애, "출생 전 생명에 대한 헌법적 고찰 - 태아 및 배아의 생명권과 그 제한을 중심으로" 대한의료법학회 10 (10): 39-73, 2009

6 박동진, "출생 전 생명에 관한 민사책임법적 고찰" 대한의료법학회 10 (10): 77-116, 2009

7 양창수, "최근의 한국민법전개정작업, in 민법연구" 박영사 2003

8 고정명, "체외수정에 대한 법적소고" (6) : 1992

9 김상용, "채권각론" 화산미디어 2009

10 곽윤직, "채권각론" 박영사 1999

11 김증한, "채권각론" 박영사 2006

12 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2007

13 김천수, "인공수정에 관한 법적 고찰" 한국민사법학회 (21) : 2002

14 황만성, "인간의 생식자와 배아의 법적 보호에 관한 연구" 한양대 2002

15 정규원, "인간배아복제의 법적 문제" 2 (2): 2002

16 장재옥, "위자료에 관한 몇 가지 고찰, in 이영준박사화갑기념, 한국민법이론의 발전" 1999

17 황동연, "역분화만능줄기세포(iPS; induced Pluripotent Stem cell)" 20 (20): 2008

18 조규창, "소유권 침해와 위자료청구권" 고려대법학연구소 4 : 1987

19 홍석영, "생명윤리및안전에관한법률’에 대한 비판적 검토" 5 (5): 2004

20 홍정화, "생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률과 유전자 윤리" 한국생명윤리학회 11 (11): 61-77, 2010

21 황정근, "불법행위로 인한 재산권의 침해에 대한 위자료청구" 16 : 1994

22 서종희, "배아연구와 인간의 존엄과 가치 - 헌재 2010.5.27. 선고, 2005헌마346 전원재판부 결정에 대한 검토 -" 법학연구소 27 (27): 243-270, 2011

23 백태승, "민법총칙" 집현재 2011

24 곽윤직, "민법총칙" 박영사 1999

25 서종희, "게임이론으로 바라본 위자료의 새로운 기능-의료과오소송을 중심으로-" 법과사회이론학회 (38) : 329-361, 2010

26 塚本伊平, "財産權侵害と慰藉料, in 裁判實務大系15 不法行爲訴訟法(1)" 靑林書院 1991

27 牧野ゆき, "財産権侵害事例における慰謝料請求の可否" 50 (50): 2006

28 김민중, "生命倫理와 民法" 한국법학원 65 : 111-142, 2002

29 後藤勇, "生命․ 新體の侵害を件わなぃ債務不履行と慰藉料一最近の裁判例を通して, in 民事判例實務硏究" 判例夕イムズ社

30 塩崎勤, "現代損害賠償法の諸問題" 判例タイムズ社 1999

31 遠山廣直, "物損に對す慰籍料請求, in 現代民事裁判の課題 7" 新日本法規 1989

32 植林弘, "注釋民法(19)" 有斐閣 2000

33 五十嵐淸, "民法學&の基礎知識(3)" 有斐閣 1975

34 田中康久, "慰謝料額の算定, 有泉亨監修, in 現代損害賠償法講座７損害賠償の範囲と額の算定" 日本評論社 1974

35 齋藤修, "慰謝料に関する諸問題”, 山田卓生編集代表, in 新․ 現代損害賠償法講座第6巻損害と保険" 日本評論社 1998

36 千葉県弁護士会, "慰藉料算定の實務" ぎょうせい 2002

37 我妻栄, "事務管理・不当利得․ 不法行為" 日本評論社 1989

38 四宮和夫, "事務管理․ 不当利得․ 不法行為（下)" 青林書院 1985

39 Schulze-Fielitz, "von Blankenagel, u.a." Tübingen 2004

40 Lilie, "in: Schreiber/Lilie/Rosenau u.a., Globalisierung der Biopolitik, des Biorechts und der Bioethik?" Frankfurt am Main 2007

41 Döhmen, Georg, "in: Deutsches Ärzte-Reis, Hans Edgar blatt (DÄBl)" 99 (99): 2002

42 "Warnock-Report (Report of the Committee of Inquiry and Human Fertilization and Embryology)" 1984

43 Mitt Romney, "The problem with the Stem Cell Bill" Boston Globe 2005

44 Michael Sandal, "The Ethics of Stem Cell Research, Human Cloning, and Genetic Engineering" 2005

45 Shinichiro MORINAGA, "The Current Debate on Human Embryo Research and Human Dignity" (3) : 2008

46 Looschelders, "Schuldrecht Allgemeiner Teil" 3-, 2005

47 Laufs-Reiling, "Schmerzensgeld wegen schuldhafter Vernichtung deponierten Spermas?" NJW 1994

48 Ludwig Siep, "Kriterien und Argumenttypen im Streit um die Embryonenforschung in Europa, in Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik" de Gruyter 2002

49 Staudinger, "Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen(Neubearbeitung 2005)" 253-, 2005

50 Canaris, "Gewinnabschöpfung bei Verletzung des allgemeinen Persönlichkeitsrechts" FS Deutsch 1999

51 Witzleb, "Geldansprüche bei Persönlichkeitsverletzungen durch Medien" 2002

52 Merkel, "Forschungsobjekt Embryo" München 2002

53 Merkel, "FS Müller-Dietz, hrsg. von Britz u.a" München 2001

54 Haßmann, "Embryonenschutz im Spannungsfeld internationaler Menschenrechte, staatlicher Grundrechte und nationaler Regelungsmodelle zur Embryonenforschung" Heidelberg ua 2003

55 Taupitz, Jochen, "Der rechtliche Rahmen des Klonens zu therapeutischen Zwecken, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift(NJW)" 54 (54): 2001

56 Taupitz, Jochen, "Der deliktsrechtliche Schutz des menschlichen Körpers und seine Teile" Neue Juristische Wochenschrift(NJW) 1995

57 Karner, "Der Ersatz ideellen Schadens im österreichischen Recht und Reform" 15 (15): 2003

58 Gunnar Duttge, "Der Embryo: ein “Niemand”?－Grenzen der Embryonen－und Stammzellforschung in: Zeitschrift für Rechtsphilosophie"

59 Kötz, "Deliktsrecht" 10-, 2005

60 Charles Krauthammer, "Crossing Lines"

61 Bill Frist, "Congressional Record Senate" 148 (148): 2002

62 Karl Larenz, "Canaris Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts" 2 (2): 13-, 1994