RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      중국 가족교육 지원정책 연구 : 발달지향의 가족교육지원정책을 향하여 = Study on Family Education Support Policy in China: Towards a Development-oriented Family Education Support Policy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16530312

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      중국에서 가족교육은 부모 또는 기타 연장자가 가족 내에서 자녀에게 진행하는 교육을 가리킨다. 가족교육은 아동의 사회화를 추진하고 아동의 전인적인 발달을 촉진하는데 있어 핵심적인 역할을 한다. 중국은 1978년 개혁개방 이후 사회ㆍ경제ㆍ문화적으로 크게 변화하였다. 이러한 변화 속에서 가족교육은 관념, 내용, 방법 등에 있어 긍정적 진전을 보였지만, 동시에 중대한 도전을 맞이하고 있다: 가족교육이 현대 아동의 전인적 발달이라는 목표와 부조화를 보이고 있는 가운데, 국가 가족교육지원 서비스에 대한 부모(또는 보호자)의 수요가 증가하고 있다.
      1980년대 이후 중국은 가족교육 지원서비스 체계의 구축을 위해 노력해 왔고, 그 노력의 결실을 맺었지만 몇 가지 측면에서 문제점을 드러내고 있다. 첫째, 가족교육지원정책의 초점이 취약가정에 치중되어 있다. 둘째, 통합적 접근이 결여되어 있다. 한마디로 중국의 가족교육지원 정책은‘결함 처방’에 맞추어져 있으며, 사후적 개입과 분절화된 특징을 보이고 있다. 그 결과 가족교육지원 욕구와 서비스 간의 불일치가 존재하고 있다.
      이러한 배경에서 본 논문은 중국 가족교육정책의 결함처방 지향에 대한 대안으로 발달지향의 가족교육지원 정책을 제시하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 발달지향의 가족교육지원 정책 구축을 위해 본 논문은 다음과 같이 제언한다.
      첫째, 중국의 발달지향의 가족교육 지원정책은 부모 또는 보호자의 가족교육 능력 향상과 정책의 포용성 증대를 지향해야 한다.
      둘째, 발달지향의 가족교육지원 정책은 정부 관리 아래 다차원적인 지원과, 예방적 개입, 정책간의 조율 등의 원칙을 따라야 한다.
      셋째, 정책의 성공적 정착을 위해 정책 관리의 합리화, 서비스 제공의 다양화와 조화, 정책 혁신, 모니터링 및 평가 시스템의 구축, 가족생애주기 맞춤형 가족교육 지원 방안 등에 중점을 두어야 한다.
      번역하기

      중국에서 가족교육은 부모 또는 기타 연장자가 가족 내에서 자녀에게 진행하는 교육을 가리킨다. 가족교육은 아동의 사회화를 추진하고 아동의 전인적인 발달을 촉진하는데 있어 핵심적인 ...

      중국에서 가족교육은 부모 또는 기타 연장자가 가족 내에서 자녀에게 진행하는 교육을 가리킨다. 가족교육은 아동의 사회화를 추진하고 아동의 전인적인 발달을 촉진하는데 있어 핵심적인 역할을 한다. 중국은 1978년 개혁개방 이후 사회ㆍ경제ㆍ문화적으로 크게 변화하였다. 이러한 변화 속에서 가족교육은 관념, 내용, 방법 등에 있어 긍정적 진전을 보였지만, 동시에 중대한 도전을 맞이하고 있다: 가족교육이 현대 아동의 전인적 발달이라는 목표와 부조화를 보이고 있는 가운데, 국가 가족교육지원 서비스에 대한 부모(또는 보호자)의 수요가 증가하고 있다.
      1980년대 이후 중국은 가족교육 지원서비스 체계의 구축을 위해 노력해 왔고, 그 노력의 결실을 맺었지만 몇 가지 측면에서 문제점을 드러내고 있다. 첫째, 가족교육지원정책의 초점이 취약가정에 치중되어 있다. 둘째, 통합적 접근이 결여되어 있다. 한마디로 중국의 가족교육지원 정책은‘결함 처방’에 맞추어져 있으며, 사후적 개입과 분절화된 특징을 보이고 있다. 그 결과 가족교육지원 욕구와 서비스 간의 불일치가 존재하고 있다.
      이러한 배경에서 본 논문은 중국 가족교육정책의 결함처방 지향에 대한 대안으로 발달지향의 가족교육지원 정책을 제시하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 발달지향의 가족교육지원 정책 구축을 위해 본 논문은 다음과 같이 제언한다.
      첫째, 중국의 발달지향의 가족교육 지원정책은 부모 또는 보호자의 가족교육 능력 향상과 정책의 포용성 증대를 지향해야 한다.
      둘째, 발달지향의 가족교육지원 정책은 정부 관리 아래 다차원적인 지원과, 예방적 개입, 정책간의 조율 등의 원칙을 따라야 한다.
      셋째, 정책의 성공적 정착을 위해 정책 관리의 합리화, 서비스 제공의 다양화와 조화, 정책 혁신, 모니터링 및 평가 시스템의 구축, 가족생애주기 맞춤형 가족교육 지원 방안 등에 중점을 두어야 한다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In China, family education refers to the education of children by parents or other elders in the family. Family education plays an irreplaceable role in promoting children's socialization and their “whole person” development. Since the Reform and Opening-up in 1978, significant progress has been achieved in family education on concept, content, method and other related aspects under the combined action of social transformation, family changes and other factors, but also followed by grand challenges showing many inconsistencies with the overall development goals for contemporary children. Chinese parents(other guardians) are in increasing demands for family education support services provided by the state And society.
      Since the 1980s. Chinese government has attached increasingly importance to the formulation and implementation of family education support policies in order to promote the establishment of a family education support service system. The family education responsibility mainly undertaken by traditional Chinese family is being released, and gradually reflecting the characteristics of “family-state” cooperation.
      Although remarkable progress has been made in family education support policies in China in the past 30 years, there are still some noticeable problems. First, the policies focus on vulnerable families. Second, the lack of integrated approach. The above problems show that there is still a serious mismatch between the supply and Demand of family education support policies in China at the current stage. It's been found in this paper that the key problem lies in the positional deviation family education support policy, that is, the current Chinese family education support policy system is still a “defect remedy” policy with the characteristics of obvious post-intervention and fragmentation.
      This paper analyzed the evolution process and characteristics of China's family education support policy, and mainly stated the prominent problems existing in the policy. On this basis, it’s concluded that family education support service system requires the shift of Chinese family education support policy from “defect remedy” to “ability development”, that is, the construction of a development-oriented family education support policy.
      Suggestions on the construction of a development-oriented family education support policy in China have been put forward in this paper.
      First, the development-oriented family education support policies in China should be guided by improving parents' family education ability and enhancing the inclusiveness of policies.
      Second, the policy construction should follow the principles of multi-level support under government management, proactive intervention and coordination of policies.
      Third, the government should focus on the policy management mechanism, multiple service principals, innovative researches on policy contents, the investment and monitoring mechanism, and the design of sustainable service projects based on different family life courses to ensure the implementation of policies for the convenience and inclusiveness of development-oriented family education support policies.
      번역하기

      In China, family education refers to the education of children by parents or other elders in the family. Family education plays an irreplaceable role in promoting children's socialization and their “whole person” development. Since the Reform and ...

      In China, family education refers to the education of children by parents or other elders in the family. Family education plays an irreplaceable role in promoting children's socialization and their “whole person” development. Since the Reform and Opening-up in 1978, significant progress has been achieved in family education on concept, content, method and other related aspects under the combined action of social transformation, family changes and other factors, but also followed by grand challenges showing many inconsistencies with the overall development goals for contemporary children. Chinese parents(other guardians) are in increasing demands for family education support services provided by the state And society.
      Since the 1980s. Chinese government has attached increasingly importance to the formulation and implementation of family education support policies in order to promote the establishment of a family education support service system. The family education responsibility mainly undertaken by traditional Chinese family is being released, and gradually reflecting the characteristics of “family-state” cooperation.
      Although remarkable progress has been made in family education support policies in China in the past 30 years, there are still some noticeable problems. First, the policies focus on vulnerable families. Second, the lack of integrated approach. The above problems show that there is still a serious mismatch between the supply and Demand of family education support policies in China at the current stage. It's been found in this paper that the key problem lies in the positional deviation family education support policy, that is, the current Chinese family education support policy system is still a “defect remedy” policy with the characteristics of obvious post-intervention and fragmentation.
      This paper analyzed the evolution process and characteristics of China's family education support policy, and mainly stated the prominent problems existing in the policy. On this basis, it’s concluded that family education support service system requires the shift of Chinese family education support policy from “defect remedy” to “ability development”, that is, the construction of a development-oriented family education support policy.
      Suggestions on the construction of a development-oriented family education support policy in China have been put forward in this paper.
      First, the development-oriented family education support policies in China should be guided by improving parents' family education ability and enhancing the inclusiveness of policies.
      Second, the policy construction should follow the principles of multi-level support under government management, proactive intervention and coordination of policies.
      Third, the government should focus on the policy management mechanism, multiple service principals, innovative researches on policy contents, the investment and monitoring mechanism, and the design of sustainable service projects based on different family life courses to ensure the implementation of policies for the convenience and inclusiveness of development-oriented family education support policies.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. Introduction 1
      • 1. Study Background 1
      • 2. Study Purpose and Structure 13
      • 2.1 Study Purpose and Research Questions 13
      • 2.2 Paper Structure 13
      • I. Introduction 1
      • 1. Study Background 1
      • 2. Study Purpose and Structure 13
      • 2.1 Study Purpose and Research Questions 13
      • 2.2 Paper Structure 13
      • Ⅱ. Theoretical Background 15
      • 1. Family Education 15
      • 2. Family Education Support Policy 22
      • 3. Development-oriented Family Education Support Policy 26
      • Ⅲ. Analysis of the current Family Education Support Policy in China 40
      • 1. Historical Process of Family Education Support Policy 43
      • 1.1 Reduction of Government' Responsibility in the Opening-Up Process 43
      • 1.2 Family Education in One-Child Policy Period 48
      • 1.3 Policy Shift to Three-Child Family 55
      • 2. Deficits of the current Family Education Support Policy 72
      • 2.1 Focus on the Vulnerable Family 72
      • 2.2 Lack of Integrated Approach 81
      • 2.3 Problems of the “Defect Remedy Model” 86
      • Ⅳ. Suggestions: Towards a Development-oriented Family Education Support Policy 91
      • 1. Political Focus: Development and Inclusion 91
      • 2. Principles of Policy Structure 96
      • 2.1 Multi-level Support under Government Management 96
      • 2.2 Proactive Intervention 99
      • 2.3 Coordination of Policies 101
      • 3. Action Strategies 103
      • 3.1 Rationalizing Policy Management 103
      • 3.2 Diversification of Service Provision 105
      • 3.3 Evidence Based Policy Innovation 108
      • 3.4 Monitoring and Evaluation 111
      • 3.5 Programme Development on Family Life Cycle 114
      • Ⅴ. Conclusions 122
      • References 129
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference) 논문관계도

      1 Hirschman , C., "Why Fertility Changes", 21 ( 1 ) , 203-233, 1994

      2 Couchman , G.W., "Parenting : An Informal Survey", 58 ( 3 ) , 285-288, 1983

      3 Wu , X.Y., "Family Orientation in Public Policy", ( 9 ) , 50-55 ., 2012

      4 Luo , F., "Family Education and Family Pedagogy .", 97 ( 8 ) , 7-9 ., 1994

      5 Sherraden , M., "Rethinking Social Welfare : Towards Assets", 18 ( 3 ) , 37-43., 1988

      6 Wu , X.Y., "The Debate of Doctrine behind Family Policy", ( 2 ) , 17-25, 2015

      7 Seltzer , J.A., "Family Change and Changing Family Demography", 56 ( 2 ) , 405-426 ., 2019

      8 Wen , J., "On the Status and Function of Family Education", 87 ( 3 ) , 45-46, 2003

      9 Wang , Y., "On Family Education and Children 's Socialization", 146 ( 5 ) , 33-35, 2005

      10 Zhai , B., "Setting up Family Education Values in the New Era", 37 ( 3 ) , 92-98 ., 2016

      1 Hirschman , C., "Why Fertility Changes", 21 ( 1 ) , 203-233, 1994

      2 Couchman , G.W., "Parenting : An Informal Survey", 58 ( 3 ) , 285-288, 1983

      3 Wu , X.Y., "Family Orientation in Public Policy", ( 9 ) , 50-55 ., 2012

      4 Luo , F., "Family Education and Family Pedagogy .", 97 ( 8 ) , 7-9 ., 1994

      5 Sherraden , M., "Rethinking Social Welfare : Towards Assets", 18 ( 3 ) , 37-43., 1988

      6 Wu , X.Y., "The Debate of Doctrine behind Family Policy", ( 2 ) , 17-25, 2015

      7 Seltzer , J.A., "Family Change and Changing Family Demography", 56 ( 2 ) , 405-426 ., 2019

      8 Wen , J., "On the Status and Function of Family Education", 87 ( 3 ) , 45-46, 2003

      9 Wang , Y., "On Family Education and Children 's Socialization", 146 ( 5 ) , 33-35, 2005

      10 Zhai , B., "Setting up Family Education Values in the New Era", 37 ( 3 ) , 92-98 ., 2016

      11 Wang , H.Y., "Meaning of Public Value , Guangdong Social Sciences", 35 ( 5 ) , 56-61 ., 2008

      12 Zhang , X., "Discrimination of Concepts Related to Public Service", 23 ( 2 ) , 57-61 ., 2010

      13 Gao , X., "The Development and Trend of Family Education Concept", ( 5 ) , 147-149, 2015

      14 Tang , J., "Inclusive Growth from the Perspective of Social Policy", 87 ( 12 ) , 29-43 ., 2011

      15 Sun , X.C., "Modern Family Education in the Perspective of Sociology", 6 ) , 36-41, 1999

      16 Baudin , T., "A role for cultural transmission in fertility transitions", 14 ( 4 ) , 454-481 ., 2010

      17 Midgley , J., "Social Policy , Economic Growth and Developmental Welfare", 10 ( 4 ) , 244-252 ., 2001

      18 Deng , Z.W. , & Xu , X., "The Changing Trajectory of Family in Contemporary China .", 112 ( 10 ) , 51-55 ., 2000

      19 Wang , J.P., "European Family Development Policy and its Reference Value", 195 ( 3 ) , 98-100 ., 2012

      20 Lundquist , A., "Parenting Support in Sweden : New Policies in Old Settings", 14 ( 4 ) , 657-668, 2015

      21 Zhang , X.L. , & Xu , Y.B., "Constructing the Development-oriented Family Policy in China", ( 6 ) , 84-96 ., 2003

      22 Sang , B. , & Tang , J., "On the Structure and Connotation of Parental Consciousness ,", 3 ) , 27-35, 2010

      23 Holliday , I., "Productivist Welfare Capitalism : Social Policy in East Asia", 48 , 706-723 ., 2000

      24 Hu , Z. , & Peng , X.Z., "China 's Family Policy under the Background of Family Changes", 36 ( 2 ) , 3-10 ., 2012

      25 Fang , W., "Social Development : A New Idea of Social Resources Allocation", ( 4 ) , 76-82 ., 2005

      26 Wang , P., "Analysis on the Development of Family Education Policy in China", 7 ( 2 ) , 66-67, 2018

      27 Becker , G.S. , & Lewis , H.G., "On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children", 81 ( 2 ) , 279-288, 1973

      28 Zhu , S.X., "Analysis and Enlightenments of Western Family Education Thoughts", 14 ( 7 ) , 250-251, 2016

      29 Midgley , J., "Growth , Redistribution , and Welfare : Toward Social Investment", 73 ( 1 ) , 3-21 ., 1999

      30 Saraceno , C., "Childcare Needs and Childcare Policies : A Multi-dimentional Issue", 59 ( 1 ) , 78-96 ., 2011

      31 Martin , C., "Parenting Support in France : Policy in an Ideological Battlefield", 14 ( 4 ) , 609-626 ., 2015

      32 Cai , Y.Q. , Liang , Z. , & Xu , H., "Research on Wuhan Government 's Supply of Family Education Social Services", 9 ) , 45-51, 2018

      33 Luo , F. , & Cui , Z.B., "The Development of Family Education Policy in New China and its Reflection", 6 ) , 3-7, 2017

      34 Midgley J., "Defining Social Development : Historical Trends and Conceptual Formulations", 16 ( 3 ) , 3-19, 1994

      35 Chin , M. , Lee , J. , Lee , S. , Son , S. , & Sung , M., "Family policy in South Korea : Development , Current Status , and Challenges", 21 ( 1 ) , 53-64 ., 2012

      36 Maccoby, E.E., "The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview", 28 ( 6 ) , 1006-1017., 1992

      37 Gu , M.Y., "The Ultimate Goal of Educational Modernization is to Cultivate Modern People .", 40 ( 10 ) , 5-5 ., 2017

      38 Jing , Y., "Problems and Solutions of Family Education under the Change of Family Structure", ( 1 ) , 49-52, 2019

      39 Sun , Y.G. , & Qu , J.W., "The Evolution , Characteristics and Prospects of Family Education Policy in China", 36 ( 3 ) , 91-96 ., 2020

      40 Li, Y. , & Cai , Y.Q., "Current Cituation and Improvement Suggestions of Family Education Support in China", ( 4 ) , 61-64, 2018

      41 Meng , Y.Q., "Parent-child Relationship : The Logical Starting Point of Family Education Research", 2 ( 2 ) , 40-43 ., 2007

      42 Hong , M., "Perspective on the Focal Points and Difficulties of Current Chinese Family Education", 88 ( 11 ) , 55-59, 2012

      43 Zhou , Q., "Comparison of Family Education Concepts Between China and Japan and Its Enlightenment", 24 ( 3 ) , 197-198, 2019

      44 Tang , X.L., "Holistic Social Policy : Rational Understanding of Development-oriented Social Policy", 5 ) , 20-24 ., 2011

      45 Li , Y.M. , & Sun , H., "Thoughts and Research on the Construction of Family Education Guidance Service System", 3 ( 35 ) , 357-358, 2016

      46 Huang , X. , Wu , Z.M. , & Huang , J.L., "Family Education : Understanding Dilemma , Mission Responsibility and Reform Strategies", 2 ) , 17-22, 2020

      47 Join-Lambert , H., "Parental Involvement and Multi-agency Support Services for High-need Families in France", 15 ( 2 ) , 317-329, 2016

      48 Liu , L. , & Li , H.Y., "Analysis on the Policy Changes of Family Eeducation Support in the 70 Years of New China", ( 7 ) , 74-80 ., 2020

      49 He , J.H., "French Family Policy and its Role in Supporting Women s Balance Between Work and Family", ( 6 ) , 70-76, 2008

      50 Gao , S.G., "Theoretical deficiency and confidence reconstruction of Chinese family education research", 40 ( 2 ) , 9-17 ., 2020

      51 Wang , Y.S., "Analysis of Household Structure Changes in Urban and Rural China Based on 2010 Census Data", 12 ) , 63-64, 2013

      52 Jaiani , V. , & Whitford , A.B., "Policy Windows , Public Opinion , and Policy Ideas : The Evolution of No Child Left Behind", 19 ( 1 ) , 8-27 ., 2011

      53 Xiu , Q.Y., "The Influence of Parent-child Relationship on Children 's Personality Development in Family", 9 ) , 20-22, 2002

      54 Chen , X.Y. , & Li , B.S., "A Study on Parent-child Relationship , Social Behavior and Peer Acceptance of Chinese Children", 3 ) , 15-26, 2015

      55 Gray , R. , & Francis , E., "The Implications of US Experiences with Early Childhood Interventions for the UK Sure Start Programme", 33 ( 6 ) , 655-663 ., 2007

      56 Wu , W., "Development-oriented Social Policy and its Enlightenments on the Development of China 's Social Policy", 35 ( 6 ) , 131-137 ., 2014

      57 Rauniyar , G. , & Kanbur , R., "Inclusive Growth and Inclusive Development : A Review and Synthesis of Asian Development Bank Literature", 15 ( 4 ) , 455-469 ., 2010

      58 Li , J., "Social Support System for Family Education of Migrant Children from the Perspective of Welfare Pluralism", 11 ) , 24-27, 2012

      59 Norman , G., "Sure Start : The Development of an Early Intervention Programme for Young Children in the United Kingdom", Volume , ( 13 ) : 257-264, 1999

      60 Meng , Y., "On the Influence of Parent-child Relationship on Adolescent Problem Behavior and Personality Characteristics", 9 ) , 18-25, 2002

      61 Yang , Q.G., "The Construction of Educational Policy Innovation System from the Perspective of Chinese Family in the New Era", 3 ) , 137-146, 2002

      62 Love , J.M. , Kisker , E.E , Ross , C. , et al., "The Effectiveness of Early Head Start for 3-Year-Old Children and Their Parents : Lessons for Policy and Programs", 6 ) , 885-901., 1993

      63 O'Connor , A. , Nolan , A. , & Bergmeier , H., "Early Childhood Education and Care Educators Supporting Parent-child Relationships : A Systematic Literature Review", 37 ( 4 ) , 400-422 ., 2016

      64 Zhang , D.Y. , & Gao , S.G., "The Function Evolution and Value Promotion of Modern Family Education : Also on the Modernization of Family Education", ( 1 ) , 66-71 ., 2020

      65 Liu , L.H. , & Hu , L.L., "Investigation on the Construction of Family Education Public Service System from the Perspective of Policy Implementation", 101 ( 2 ) , 114-120, 2020

      66 Sobotka , T., "Post-transitional Fertility : The Role of Childbearing Postponement in Fuelling the Shift to Low and Unstable Fertility Levels .", 49 ( 1 ) , 20-45 ., 2017

      67 Berger , L.M. , & Carlson , M.J., "Family policy and complex contemporary families : A decade in review and implications for the next decade of research and policy practice", 82 ( 1 ) , 478-507 ., 2020

      68 Cowan , P. , & Cowan , C., "Diverging Family Policies to Promote Children 's Well-being in the UK and US : Some Relevant Data from Family Research and Intervention Studies", 3 ( 4 ) , 4-16, 2008

      69 Li , L.M., "The Influence of Parental Presence on Adolescents ' Non-cognitive Abilities : An Experimental Study from the Perspective of Parent-child Eating", 26 ( 2 ) , 88-98, 2020

      70 Yang , Q.G., "The Construction of Developmental Family Compensation Education Policy : From the Perspective of Family Participation Inequality in School Reform", 25 ( 5 ) , 15-20, 2009

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼