RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      기업지배와 혁신에 관한 제도론적 고찰과 함의 = Corporate Governance and Innovation : Institutional Approach and Implications

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108020546

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this paper is to try to examine the relationship between corporate governance and innovation in terms of integrated theories of firm and comparative institutional theoretical context, and to suggest its policy implicaton in Korea. Theor...

      The purpose of this paper is to try to examine the relationship between corporate governance and innovation in terms of integrated theories of firm and comparative institutional theoretical context, and to suggest its policy implicaton in Korea. Theories of firm have shown that integrated theories of firm approach focuse on competence and governance(contract) dimension of the firm. A varieties of comparative capitalism researches have emphasized institutional complementarities among systems of corporate governance, labor market and industrial relations, education and training, financial system, and national innovation system, with the cores placed on corporate governance and innovation system because their areas concerned overlap each other. For more coherent systemic approach the two levels of micro and macro research could better be integrated. While dichotomy based on contrasting economic coordination methods such as market and non-market institution might cause excessive simplification a varieties of institutional complementaries connote diverse grey types of combinations. The difficulties lie in the fact that while competence approach including innovation is dynamic in nature governance approach implies static efficiency, making their integration uneasy. However, since institutional complementaries would gradually evolve as institution changes economic and firm strategies based on comparative institutional advantages could develop in consideration of dynamic efficiency. This framework implies that hybrid corporate governance systems in harmony with complementary innovation systems could be dynamically sought, with flexible infrastructures provided by government facilitating evolutionary systemic choice by firms. In Korea, traditional industries and new growth industries which require contrasting corporate governance and innovation structures and strategies need the development of volutionary hybrid systems in consideration of institutional complementaries and comparative institutional advantages.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서언 Ⅱ. 거시적 기업지배시스템과 혁신시스템 Ⅲ. 미시적 기업지배구조와 혁신 Ⅳ. 기업지배와 혁신에 관한 통합적 틀과 함의 참고문헌
      • Ⅰ. 서언 Ⅱ. 거시적 기업지배시스템과 혁신시스템 Ⅲ. 미시적 기업지배구조와 혁신 Ⅳ. 기업지배와 혁신에 관한 통합적 틀과 함의 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼