RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기관생명윤리위원회 신속심의에 대한 법정책적 기준 마련에 관한 제언 = A Study on the Legal Standards and Policy about the Expedited Review by the Institutional Review Board

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102554735

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      For the research review to protect the research participants, the Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) has been using two procedures: one is the review procedure by full institutional review board (“full board review procedure”) as the principle...

      For the research review to protect the research participants, the Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) has been using two procedures: one is the review procedure by full institutional review board (“full board review procedure”) as the principled research review procedure, the other is the expedited review procedure as the exceptional research review procedure. Both procedures are recognized internationally, and they have been introduced by significant numbers of Korean IRBs. But, despite the legal requirement of the research review under the Bioethics and Safety Act, there is almost nothing about the legal standards and policy related to the expedited review unlike the full board review. Operating the expedited review procedure can greatly contribute to improved IRB task efficiency because it is possible to relatively reduce the burden on the operation of the full board review procedure relatively and make it possible to make appropriate review on the research that needs the full board review because of its risk, participation of vulnerable persons, sensitiveness of collected information and so on. Besides, the review result can be derived quickly by the expedited review procedure. Therefore, to recognize the expedited review officially, to assess the appropriateness of the actual operation, to prevent abuse and misuse of the expedited review procedure, and to make the expedited review procedure used properly, the legal standards and policy about the expedited review should be established. So in this article, I propose some considerations for establishing the legal standards and policy about the expedited review such as the level and types of research risk, vulnerability of the research participant and so on.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 들어가며
      • Ⅱ. 신속심의의 개념 및 의의
      • Ⅲ. 신속심의에 대한 법정책적 기준 마련의 필요성
      • Ⅳ. 신속심의에 대한 법정책적 기준 마련 시 고려하여야 하는 사항
      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 들어가며
      • Ⅱ. 신속심의의 개념 및 의의
      • Ⅲ. 신속심의에 대한 법정책적 기준 마련의 필요성
      • Ⅳ. 신속심의에 대한 법정책적 기준 마련 시 고려하여야 하는 사항
      • Ⅴ. 마치며
      • References
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼