RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, I sought answers to two questions. First, what is the migration route for non-EU migrants in the EU? Second, what are the factors that affect irregular migrants` destination decisions? A migrant`s first country of entry into Europe is usually not his final destination. The main entry points for irregular migrants to Europe are Greece, Italy and Spain. It seems that immigrants do not necessarily follow a particular path to go to the northern European countries. Based on the number of asylum seekers, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the Scandinavian countries are the biggest destinations. For the second question, five factors were found. The first is the cost of migration and the migrants` perception of the economic environment of destination countries. The second is the migrant smugglers. The third is social network and information accessibility. This includes information from remote, near-network, media, internet and social media. The fourth is the environment and experience of the transit country. The fifth is the immigration policies. They include border control, police intervention, refugee policy, and repatriation policy. Studies on irregular migration have inherent problems. It is the task of academia and policy makers to resolve them one by one. First, the distinction between legal and irregular migration, and the different forms of irregular migration are not always clear. It is useful to compare with studies on legal migration in order to understand the reasons and the ways migrants decide to move. Second, irregular migrants are difficult to study. They are in essence secret groups. Third, there have been lots of studies on irregular migrants in the past two decades, but there are still many cases that are not theorized. Fourth, until recently, there have been many studies on the phenomena of irregular migration, but there are more that require further study and understanding than what can be explained with clear grounds until now.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박선희, "프랑스의 난민정책: EU 공동난민정책의 영향을 중심으로" EU연구소 (42) : 27-63, 2016

2 이승현, "유럽의 시리아 난민유입과 독일의 노동정책" 66-81, 2016

3 안병억, "유럽의 난민 위기와 공동이민망명정책 - 초국가주의의 한계와 전망 -" 한국독일사학회 (31) : 1-33, 2016

4 이용일, "독일사회에서의 난민 논쟁 (1980-1993)" 한국독일사학회 (31) : 35-74, 2016

5 Van Hear, N, "‘I went as far as my money would take me’: Conflict, Forced Migration and Class" COMPAS 2006

6 Brekke, J, "Why Norway? Understanding Asylum Destinations" Institute for Social Research 2009

7 Fargues, P, "When the best option is a leaky boat: why migrants risk their lives crossing the Mediterranean and what Europe is doing about it" Migration Policy Centre, EUI 1-16, 2014

8 Robinson, V, "Understanding the Decision Making of Asylum Seekers" Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate 2002

9 Carling, J, "Unauthorized Migration from Africa to Spain" 45 (45): 3-37, 2007

10 Düvell, F, "Transit Migration: A Blurred and Politicised Concept" (Special) : 415-427, 2010