RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      텍스트의 통사적(서술과 격 할당) 이해 방법

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109347772

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      What to say is only a lump of ideas before it has a concrete form and structure. Two things must be chosen to organize these ambiguous ideas to have a concrete form and structure. First, certain signs that can express these pieces of ideas and second, the pattern of relation between these signs should be selected. Ideas become conceptualized and these concepts formulate sentence patterns through concrete language signs. These sentences aggregate as a structure of text which is an utterance, the expression of ideas or thoughts. However, like a relationship between water and bowl, ideas and thoughts can be conformed as a various form of text depending on the structure. What is important is the content of the text. The main concern of this paper is to figure out a method to grasp the content of text transcending their various types of structure. This method was investigated by reanalyzing and applying Greimas model of actant; generalizing sentence patterns to an original structural level of form of discourse by grounding the understanding of relations between predicate-case of construction grammar in linguistics theory.
      번역하기

      What to say is only a lump of ideas before it has a concrete form and structure. Two things must be chosen to organize these ambiguous ideas to have a concrete form and structure. First, certain signs that can express these pieces of ideas and second,...

      What to say is only a lump of ideas before it has a concrete form and structure. Two things must be chosen to organize these ambiguous ideas to have a concrete form and structure. First, certain signs that can express these pieces of ideas and second, the pattern of relation between these signs should be selected. Ideas become conceptualized and these concepts formulate sentence patterns through concrete language signs. These sentences aggregate as a structure of text which is an utterance, the expression of ideas or thoughts. However, like a relationship between water and bowl, ideas and thoughts can be conformed as a various form of text depending on the structure. What is important is the content of the text. The main concern of this paper is to figure out a method to grasp the content of text transcending their various types of structure. This method was investigated by reanalyzing and applying Greimas model of actant; generalizing sentence patterns to an original structural level of form of discourse by grounding the understanding of relations between predicate-case of construction grammar in linguistics theory.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 이론적 배경
      • 3. 통합모형
      • 4. 결론
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 이론적 배경
      • 3. 통합모형
      • 4. 결론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼