RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      행위자들의 양면적 상황설정과 딜레마 그리고 제도화: 노사정위원회의 제도화 과정을 중심으로 = Organizations` Equivocal Enactment, Dilemma, and Institutionalization: A Case Study on the Institutionalization Process of The Korea Tripartite Commission

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45040511

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Despite lack of commitment and motivation by participants to an organization, the Korea Tripartite Commission (KTC) has been successfully consolidated and institutionalized. This study takes the theoretical view that an organization does not perceive the objective environment passively, but creates it actively through an enactment. The analysis shows that all participants, seemingly paradoxical, have enacted the environment both positively and negatively at once. These paradoxical and conflictual constructions are a result of the environment by equivocal enactment. The participants have taken equivocal enactment to meet the trade-offs between the demands of environmental change and status quo. For example, the participants have wanted to expand the function of KTC as well as rejecting a stronger KTC`s status. This kind of equivocal enactment has imposed dilemmas on each participant at the time of making decisions. The KTC has been institutionalized absorbing equivocal demands. The findings of this study that organizations take the equivocal enactment may be contradictory to modernistic organization theory. But these contradictory phenomena exist in organizational behavior and policy processes.
      번역하기

      Despite lack of commitment and motivation by participants to an organization, the Korea Tripartite Commission (KTC) has been successfully consolidated and institutionalized. This study takes the theoretical view that an organization does not perceive ...

      Despite lack of commitment and motivation by participants to an organization, the Korea Tripartite Commission (KTC) has been successfully consolidated and institutionalized. This study takes the theoretical view that an organization does not perceive the objective environment passively, but creates it actively through an enactment. The analysis shows that all participants, seemingly paradoxical, have enacted the environment both positively and negatively at once. These paradoxical and conflictual constructions are a result of the environment by equivocal enactment. The participants have taken equivocal enactment to meet the trade-offs between the demands of environmental change and status quo. For example, the participants have wanted to expand the function of KTC as well as rejecting a stronger KTC`s status. This kind of equivocal enactment has imposed dilemmas on each participant at the time of making decisions. The KTC has been institutionalized absorbing equivocal demands. The findings of this study that organizations take the equivocal enactment may be contradictory to modernistic organization theory. But these contradictory phenomena exist in organizational behavior and policy processes.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼