RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      남북조~수당시대의 기자·기자조선 인식 = Recognition of Kija from Southern and Northern Dynasties to Sui-Tang Dynasties

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109649919

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study explores the changing perceptions of Kija (箕子) and Kija Joseon (箕子朝鮮) in Chinese historical texts from the Northern and Southern Dynasties through to the Sui and Tang periods. The Jizi tradition, first systematized as the “Jizi Joseon theory” in the Records of the Three Kingdoms (三國志) during the Wei-Jin period, continued to expand and gain traction throughout the subsequent centuries. During the Northern and Southern Dynasties, attempts were made to geographically verify the ancient territory of Gojoseon, and sources documenting the location of Jizi’s tomb began to appear. Notably, epitaphs from the Northern Wei record that members of the Lelang Wang clan (樂浪王氏) claimed descent from Jizi. In addition, the Book of the Later Han (後漢書) reflects the influence of the Records of the Three Kingdoms by presenting a historical sequence that connects Jizi, King Jun, Wiman Joseon, and the Han commanderies. In the Sui and Tang periods, the Jizi Joseon narrative was actively used to legitimize the Chinese invasions of Goguryeo, leading to its wider dissemination. At the same time, the Collected Annotations to the Records of the Grand Historian (史記三家注) consistently referenced the tradition that Jizi’s tomb was located in Meng County (蒙縣) of Liang State (梁國), and a shrine dedicated to Jizi was constructed in Jixian (汲縣), Henan during the Tang dynasty. These sources imply that Jizi never actually traveled to the region of Old joseon. Thus, while the theory of Jizi Joseon gained prominence as a political tool in this period, it coexisted with other traditions that emphasized Jizi’s historical presence within the Chinese heartland, revealing a tension between political narrative and historical memory.
      번역하기

      This study explores the changing perceptions of Kija (箕子) and Kija Joseon (箕子朝鮮) in Chinese historical texts from the Northern and Southern Dynasties through to the Sui and Tang periods. The Jizi tradition, first systematized as the “Jiz...

      This study explores the changing perceptions of Kija (箕子) and Kija Joseon (箕子朝鮮) in Chinese historical texts from the Northern and Southern Dynasties through to the Sui and Tang periods. The Jizi tradition, first systematized as the “Jizi Joseon theory” in the Records of the Three Kingdoms (三國志) during the Wei-Jin period, continued to expand and gain traction throughout the subsequent centuries. During the Northern and Southern Dynasties, attempts were made to geographically verify the ancient territory of Gojoseon, and sources documenting the location of Jizi’s tomb began to appear. Notably, epitaphs from the Northern Wei record that members of the Lelang Wang clan (樂浪王氏) claimed descent from Jizi. In addition, the Book of the Later Han (後漢書) reflects the influence of the Records of the Three Kingdoms by presenting a historical sequence that connects Jizi, King Jun, Wiman Joseon, and the Han commanderies. In the Sui and Tang periods, the Jizi Joseon narrative was actively used to legitimize the Chinese invasions of Goguryeo, leading to its wider dissemination. At the same time, the Collected Annotations to the Records of the Grand Historian (史記三家注) consistently referenced the tradition that Jizi’s tomb was located in Meng County (蒙縣) of Liang State (梁國), and a shrine dedicated to Jizi was constructed in Jixian (汲縣), Henan during the Tang dynasty. These sources imply that Jizi never actually traveled to the region of Old joseon. Thus, while the theory of Jizi Joseon gained prominence as a political tool in this period, it coexisted with other traditions that emphasized Jizi’s historical presence within the Chinese heartland, revealing a tension between political narrative and historical memory.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼