This study explores the changing perceptions of Kija (箕子) and Kija Joseon (箕子朝鮮) in Chinese historical texts from the Northern and Southern Dynasties through to the Sui and Tang periods. The Jizi tradition, first systematized as the “Jiz...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109649919
조원진 (한양대학교(ERICA캠퍼스) 문화재연구소)
2025
Korean
Kija(箕子) ; Kija Joseon(箕子朝鮮) ; Old Joseon(古朝鮮) ; Nakrang Diaspora(樂浪遺民) ; County back theory(郡縣回復論) ; 箕子 ; 箕子朝鮮 ; 古朝鮮 ; 樂浪遺民 ; 郡縣回復論
KCI등재
학술저널
313-354(42쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study explores the changing perceptions of Kija (箕子) and Kija Joseon (箕子朝鮮) in Chinese historical texts from the Northern and Southern Dynasties through to the Sui and Tang periods. The Jizi tradition, first systematized as the “Jiz...
This study explores the changing perceptions of Kija (箕子) and Kija Joseon (箕子朝鮮) in Chinese historical texts from the Northern and Southern Dynasties through to the Sui and Tang periods. The Jizi tradition, first systematized as the “Jizi Joseon theory” in the Records of the Three Kingdoms (三國志) during the Wei-Jin period, continued to expand and gain traction throughout the subsequent centuries. During the Northern and Southern Dynasties, attempts were made to geographically verify the ancient territory of Gojoseon, and sources documenting the location of Jizi’s tomb began to appear. Notably, epitaphs from the Northern Wei record that members of the Lelang Wang clan (樂浪王氏) claimed descent from Jizi. In addition, the Book of the Later Han (後漢書) reflects the influence of the Records of the Three Kingdoms by presenting a historical sequence that connects Jizi, King Jun, Wiman Joseon, and the Han commanderies. In the Sui and Tang periods, the Jizi Joseon narrative was actively used to legitimize the Chinese invasions of Goguryeo, leading to its wider dissemination. At the same time, the Collected Annotations to the Records of the Grand Historian (史記三家注) consistently referenced the tradition that Jizi’s tomb was located in Meng County (蒙縣) of Liang State (梁國), and a shrine dedicated to Jizi was constructed in Jixian (汲縣), Henan during the Tang dynasty. These sources imply that Jizi never actually traveled to the region of Old joseon. Thus, while the theory of Jizi Joseon gained prominence as a political tool in this period, it coexisted with other traditions that emphasized Jizi’s historical presence within the Chinese heartland, revealing a tension between political narrative and historical memory.
『日本書紀』 孝德紀에 보이는 倭國의 대외 관계 -韓半島諸國과의 교류를 중심으로-