As consider above, the sexuality problem shown in the literature criticism of nineteen fifties has become an important opportunity of getting `the body` problem into stride as a critical discussion. This has been realized as an attitude of critically ...
As consider above, the sexuality problem shown in the literature criticism of nineteen fifties has become an important opportunity of getting `the body` problem into stride as a critical discussion. This has been realized as an attitude of critically recognizing the resistant meaning about modernistic development logic of emphasizing the reasoning power through the literal results. And, also this discussion has become an opportunity of critically recognizing the ideological problem based in the modernistic ego formation problem, more definitely a lifestyle under the American imperialism system. And, the attitude of recognizing the body not as a simple physical body but as related to the nation and societal system provides the opportunity of valuating the pathological imagination appearing in the literature of nineteen fifties relating to the modernistic subject problem not of interpreting related to the simple deformed body. The sexuality discussion as an ethical deviation makes us reconsider not only a simple moral imbalance but also what the societal and total factors constituting the modernistic ego are. In this the postwar period societal reality naturally internalizing the patriarch logic building the crisis sense and the ideological attitudes mass-producing the ethical and moral enlightening subject are working secretly. And, this has a meaning in the aspect that this is showing a characteristic facet of postwar period criticism.