RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중국 이중호적제도의 형성과 배경 분석 = Analysis on the Formation and Background of China’s Dual Family Registration System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107255945

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The freedom of residence and relocation of Chinese citizens in early New China was guaranteed by law and constitution. However, when the "Hukou Registration Ordinance" was issued in 1958, a dual family registration system was established between citie...

      The freedom of residence and relocation of Chinese citizens in early New China was guaranteed by law and constitution. However, when the "Hukou Registration Ordinance" was issued in 1958, a dual family registration system was established between cities and provinces, and Chinese citizens were divided into rural areas and urban areas depending on their residence, and urban migration of rural populations was strictly controlled. Although confusion arose in the management of Hukou during the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, the relocation of the rural population to the city was more strictly controlled and the dual family registry system became more specific.
      Since the dual family registry system was established in the late 50s, China's family registry system has greatly influenced the political, economic, social, cultural, and individual daily lives beyond the original functions of the family registry system, such as demographics and security management. Thus, the side effects caused by the dual family registry system are not only simple problems such as poor demographics and poor management of the estates, but also cause serious social problems such as delaying the urbanization of China, widening the gap between urban and rural residents' income, and various discrimination against the rural population and inefficiency of the family registry system itself.
      The formation of China's dual family registry system is directly attributable to the large-scale urban migration of the rural population that emerged in the early days of the establishment of New China. The heavy industry-oriented industrialization policy promoted with the "1·5 Plan" is also an important reason for the formation of a dual family registration system that divides rural areas and cities. China promoted heavy industry-oriented industrialization by mobilizing all possible resources by using its national administrative power and relying on agriculture to provide the necessary food and materials for industrialization and for industrial production. And a dual family registry system has been established to limit the free flow of farmers in order to keep more rural labor forces engaged in the production of agricultural products needed by the Chinese government and to prevent the employment and financial burden from increasing due to the influx of rural populations into cities. The dual family registry system is closely linked to the planned job arrangement and the planned purchase and supply policy for agricultural products and various welfare and subsidy policies biased to urban residents, which China has promoted with the establishment of a planned economic system, and has a functionally complementary nature. In addition, China's dual family registry system was also partly influenced by Chinese traditional family registry system and culture. China's former feudal dynasties attached farmers to their land, disallowing arbitrary migration and drift and using them as a source of tax stability to maintain the closed order of agricultural empire. The peasant was an eternal catch, paying taxes and services and sacrificed for the luxurious life of the bureaucrat class. Even after the establishment of the New China, the two-way social governance system was established by dividing cities and rural areas through family registers, and the functions of social welfare and Family Planning were added again to become one fundamental system.
      Currently, China is pushing for a deepen reformation of the family registry system, which focuses on equalizing basic public services and unifying urban and rural family registers. The distinction between agricultural and non-agricultural Hukou based on dual family registration systems has already been cancelled. The dual family registry system, which has caused inequality and discrimination in farmers over the past half century, has now disappeared from the historical stage. But this is only a formality reform and only the beginning of a family register unification reform. Unless various inequalities and discrimination against urban migration farmers who still remain in cities, especially large cities and large cities, real reform of family registry unification will not be possible unless it is completely eliminated.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최명해, "중국 ‘신형도시화’의 핵심 이슈와 전망" 삼성경제연구소 1-12, 2013

      2 岳德松, "试论我国城乡经济统筹发展中的户籍管理制度改革" 中共四川省委党校 (3) : 81-83, 2006

      3 姚秀兰, "论中国户籍制度的演变与改革" 华东政法大学 (5) : 45-54, 2004

      4 刘星航, "粮食统购统销与户籍制度的联系" 中共北京市委党史研究室 (6) : 27-28, 2002

      5 "百度百科"

      6 "法律图书馆"

      7 毛泽东, "毛泽东选集(第5卷)" 人民出版社 1977

      8 郝斌, "户籍制度改革--我国二元户籍制度的形成、弊端及改革原则" 河北青年管理干部学院 (4) : 76-79, 2005

      9 王红丽, "我国户籍制度弊端浅析" 兰州大学西北人口研究所 (1) : 2-9, 2003

      10 高强, "我国户籍制度弊端及创新研究" 甘肃省社会科学院 (2) : 11-14, 2006

      1 최명해, "중국 ‘신형도시화’의 핵심 이슈와 전망" 삼성경제연구소 1-12, 2013

      2 岳德松, "试论我国城乡经济统筹发展中的户籍管理制度改革" 中共四川省委党校 (3) : 81-83, 2006

      3 姚秀兰, "论中国户籍制度的演变与改革" 华东政法大学 (5) : 45-54, 2004

      4 刘星航, "粮食统购统销与户籍制度的联系" 中共北京市委党史研究室 (6) : 27-28, 2002

      5 "百度百科"

      6 "法律图书馆"

      7 毛泽东, "毛泽东选集(第5卷)" 人民出版社 1977

      8 郝斌, "户籍制度改革--我国二元户籍制度的形成、弊端及改革原则" 河北青年管理干部学院 (4) : 76-79, 2005

      9 王红丽, "我国户籍制度弊端浅析" 兰州大学西北人口研究所 (1) : 2-9, 2003

      10 高强, "我国户籍制度弊端及创新研究" 甘肃省社会科学院 (2) : 11-14, 2006

      11 梁桂英, "我国户口迁移制度弊端与改革刍议" 太原理工大学等12所院校 21 (21): 12-15, 2009

      12 温铁军, "我们是怎么失去迁徒自由的" 中国经济体制改革研究会 (4) : 22-23, 2002

      13 白莎, "当代中国户籍制度的成因考" 南昌师范学院 25 (25): 107-110, 2004

      14 中央人民政府内务部社会司, "应劝阻农民盲目向城市流动"

      15 李若建, "大跃进时期的城镇化高潮与衰退" 首都经济贸易大学 (5) : 3-5, 1999

      16 公安部, "城市户口管理暂行条例"

      17 刘社建, "城乡居民收入分配差距形成原因及对策研究" 上海财经大学 30 (30): 93-103, 2004

      18 中国中央, "国家新型城镇化规划(2014-2020年)"

      19 国务院, "国务院批转 「公安部关于处理户口迁移的规定」的通知"

      20 何为, "半城市化:中国城市化进程中的两类异化现象研究" 同济大学建筑城规学院 (2) : 24-32, 2012

      21 "北大法宝"

      22 王春光, "农村流动人口的‘半城市化’问题研究" 中国社会科学院社会学研究所 (5) : 107-123, 2006

      23 国务院, "关于防止农民盲目流入城市的通知" (42) : 3-4, 1957

      24 国务院, "关于防止农村人口盲目外流的补充指示" (6) : 16-17, 1957

      25 国务院, "关于防止农村人口盲目外流的指示" (2) : 9-10, 1957

      26 国务院, "关于进一步推进户籍制度改革的意见"

      27 中央人民政府内务部, "关于继续贯彻劝止农民盲目流入城市的指示" (6) : 46-47, 1954

      28 中共中央, "关于立即停止招收新职工和固定临时工的通知"

      29 国务院, "关于建立经常户口登记制度的指示"

      30 政务院, "关于实行粮食计划收购和计划供应的命令" (24) : 1953

      31 公安部, "关于处理户口迁移的规定(草案)"

      32 国务院, "关于各单位从农村中招用临时工的暂行规定" (54) : 37-38, 1957

      33 中央人民政府政务院, "关于劝止农民盲目流入城市的指示" (8) : 21-, 1953

      34 中共中央办公厅, "关于制止农村劳动力盲目外流的紧急通知"

      35 中共中央, "关于制止农村人口盲目外流的指示" (23) : 3-5, 1957

      36 周科, "全国31省份全面取消农业户口,农民权益有无影响?" 中国农村杂志社;中国农村合作经济管理学会 10-11, 2016

      37 "人民日报电子版"

      38 "中央政府门户网站"

      39 "中国网"

      40 国家统计局, "中国统计年鉴" 中国统计出版社

      41 "中国经济网"

      42 陆学艺, "中国社会发展报告" 辽宁人民出版社 1991

      43 顾洪章, "中国知识青年上山下乡始末" 中国检察出版社 1996

      44 "中国知网"

      45 "中国法院网"

      46 杨云彦, "中国人口迁移与发展的长期战略" 武汉出版社 1994

      47 国家统计局人口和社会科技统计司, "中国人口统计年鉴" 中国统计出版社 2001

      48 全国人大常委会, "中华人民共和国户口登记条例"

      49 全国人民代表大会, "中华人民共和国宪法(1975年)"

      50 全国人民代表大会, "中华人民共和国宪法(1954年)"

      51 中共中央, "中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定"

      52 上海市劳动局, "上海市单位使用和聘用外地劳动力分类管理办法"

      53 周明长, "‘一五’重工业优先发展战略与工业城市的发展" 四川大学 123-126, 2004

      54 Yang, Dennis Tao, "Rural-Urban Disparity and Sectoral Labor Allocation in China" 35 (35): 105-133, 1999

      55 赵文远, "20世纪50年代农民盲目外流与现代户籍制度的形成" 首都师范大学 (1) : 130-133, 2012

      56 周恩来, "1957年国务院政府工作报告--1957年6月26日在第一届全国人民代表大会第四次会议上"

      57 中共中央, "1956年到1967年全国农业发展纲要(修正草案)"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-07-28 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Chinese Studies and Sinology -> Journal of Sinology and China Studies KCI등재
      2015-07-28 학술지명변경 외국어명 : China Studies -> Journal of Chinese Studies and Sinology KCI등재
      2015-03-26 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> China Studies KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-08-22 학회명변경 영문명 : INSTITUTE OF CHINESE STUDIES, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign St -> INSTITUTE OF CHINESE STUDIES, Hankuk University of Foreign St KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.28 0.28 0.27
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.31 0.27 0.492 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼