RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      화용표지에 관한 연구 = On Pragmatic Markers

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2096848

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Pragmatic marker are an essential means by which speakers and hearers achieve cohesion and coherence in the developing discourse. Pragmatic markers have attracted a lot of research recently for the analysis of discourse.
      Levison(1983) only mentioned that pragmatic markers indicated the relationship between an utterance and prior discourse and their examples were utterance-initial usages of but, therefore, actually and etc. He, however, did not generalize pragmatic markers beyond brief comments. Since then most of researchers such as Schourup(1985), Schffrin(1987), and Jucker(1990) have concentrated on the limited functions and numbers of individual markers. In other words, they did not deal with a whole range of pragmatic markers, especially the classification of markers. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to generalize pragmatic markers including the classification of them and to refine the understanding of their area.
      Pragmatic markers not only work as contextual coordinates, but also function as speaker's and hearer's exchange of topic shift and local, global actions of topic continuing, which can make them occur in utterance-initial, sometimes medial and final positions in the speech events. As they are related to the speech situation, and not to the situation talked about, they do not affect the truth conditions of an utterance and do not add nothing to the propositional context, which can cause them to be deleted and to have an independent occurrence from the proposition.
      Pragmatic markers as an expression of speaker's emotion, attitude, comment, and information must cover well, you know, I mean, you see as well as interjection, all of which Fraser(1990) excluded from his classification. The characteristic connection of one utterance to other utterances including these markers can be classified as follows: enumerative, reinforcing, equative, contrastive, summative, resultive, replacive, inferential, concessive, disjunctive, transitional conjunctive, evocative, responsive and informational markers. Pragmatic markers are linguistic expression which enriches our insights into understanding of interaction between speakers and hearers.
      번역하기

      Pragmatic marker are an essential means by which speakers and hearers achieve cohesion and coherence in the developing discourse. Pragmatic markers have attracted a lot of research recently for the analysis of discourse. Levison(1983) only mentioned ...

      Pragmatic marker are an essential means by which speakers and hearers achieve cohesion and coherence in the developing discourse. Pragmatic markers have attracted a lot of research recently for the analysis of discourse.
      Levison(1983) only mentioned that pragmatic markers indicated the relationship between an utterance and prior discourse and their examples were utterance-initial usages of but, therefore, actually and etc. He, however, did not generalize pragmatic markers beyond brief comments. Since then most of researchers such as Schourup(1985), Schffrin(1987), and Jucker(1990) have concentrated on the limited functions and numbers of individual markers. In other words, they did not deal with a whole range of pragmatic markers, especially the classification of markers. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to generalize pragmatic markers including the classification of them and to refine the understanding of their area.
      Pragmatic markers not only work as contextual coordinates, but also function as speaker's and hearer's exchange of topic shift and local, global actions of topic continuing, which can make them occur in utterance-initial, sometimes medial and final positions in the speech events. As they are related to the speech situation, and not to the situation talked about, they do not affect the truth conditions of an utterance and do not add nothing to the propositional context, which can cause them to be deleted and to have an independent occurrence from the proposition.
      Pragmatic markers as an expression of speaker's emotion, attitude, comment, and information must cover well, you know, I mean, you see as well as interjection, all of which Fraser(1990) excluded from his classification. The characteristic connection of one utterance to other utterances including these markers can be classified as follows: enumerative, reinforcing, equative, contrastive, summative, resultive, replacive, inferential, concessive, disjunctive, transitional conjunctive, evocative, responsive and informational markers. Pragmatic markers are linguistic expression which enriches our insights into understanding of interaction between speakers and hearers.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서언
      • 2. 화용표지의 특성
      • 3. 담화의 화용표지
      • 4. 화용표지 유형
      • 4. 결언
      • 1. 서언
      • 2. 화용표지의 특성
      • 3. 담화의 화용표지
      • 4. 화용표지 유형
      • 4. 결언
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼