본 연구에서는 타인의 창의적 소비에 대해 사람들이 보이는 반응의 차이를 설명하는 개인차 변인으로 창의적 소비효능감에 주목하였고, 창의적 소비효능감이 창의적 소비의도를 높이는지 ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106869719
2020
-
KCI등재
학술저널
183-201(19쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
본 연구에서는 타인의 창의적 소비에 대해 사람들이 보이는 반응의 차이를 설명하는 개인차 변인으로 창의적 소비효능감에 주목하였고, 창의적 소비효능감이 창의적 소비의도를 높이는지 ...
본 연구에서는 타인의 창의적 소비에 대해 사람들이 보이는 반응의 차이를 설명하는 개인차 변인으로 창의적 소비효능감에 주목하였고, 창의적 소비효능감이 창의적 소비의도를 높이는지 보고자 하였다. 창의적 소비는 소비와 관련된 문제를 제품의 원래 용도나 방식과는 다르게 새로우면서 유용하게 해결하는 소비 방식으로, Ikea 제품을 원래의 방식대로 조립해서 사용하지 않고 자신만의 방식으로 조립해서 사용하는 Ikea hack은 창의적 소비의 좋은 예이다. 본 연구의 자극물로 Ikea의 원 제품의 사용 방식과 창의적으로 소비된 방식(Ikea hack)을 함께 보여주고, 창의적 소비 제품에 대한 가치 지각이 창의적 소비효능감이 창의적 소비의도에 미치는 영향을 매개하는지, 그리고 자신의 손재주에 대해 지각된 효능감이 그 과정을 조절하는지를 검증하였다. 창의성 정도가 다른 4개의 자극물을 가지고 연구한 결과, 소비자의 창의적 소비효능감 정도에 따라 타인의 창의적 소비를 보여주는 자극물에 대해 기능적, 심미적 가치를 보다 높게 지각하고 이것이 창의적 소비행동 의도를 높임을 볼 수 있었다. 또한 창의적 소비효능감이 가치 지각에 미치는 영향을 손재주 효능감이 조절함을 볼 수 있었다. 이러한 결과는 전체 데이터에서 검증되었고, 개별 자극물의 경우 매개효과는 3개, 조절된 매개효과는 4개의 자극물에서 반복적으로 검증되었다. 마지막으로 본 연구 결과가 창의적 소비문화 확산에 갖는 시사점, 향후 연구와 한계점에 대해 논의하였다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Lately, people often upload and share photos and videos portraying their daily consumption experiences on social media such as YouTube and Instagram. Some of videos show creative consumption solving a consumption problem in a new and useful way by usi...
Lately, people often upload and share photos and videos portraying their daily consumption experiences on social media such as YouTube and Instagram. Some of videos show creative consumption solving a consumption problem in a new and useful way by using a product differently from the suggested or original use or usage. Ikea hack is such a good example and actively consumed in social media. The current study aims to examine how people would respond to this kind of creative consumption by others. On YouTube, many how-to videos are listed and many people learn new things by watching and following the videos. People may respond to creative consumption experience by others in various ways. Some people are astonished at their creativity but do nothing. They just enjoy such pictures or videos. Others participate in creative consumption by themselves either following exactly the same way or adapting the idea in their own way. Like this, people show different reactions. Then, where do the differences in reactions come from? As suggested in prior studies, we focus on creative consumption efficacy as an individual difference factor explaining differences in reactions to others’ creative consumption. The current study used Ikea hack as an example of creative consumption and examined if high creative consumption efficacy led to higher creative consumption intention and if value perception of creative consumption stimuli mediated the effect of creative consumption efficacy on creative consumption intention and the moderating effect of dexterity efficacy as well.
For the main study, four original Ikea products and creatively consumed stimuli (Ikea hacks) were used. The four stimuli were chosen from a pretest using thirty four stimuli with sixty nine participants. They were asked to evaluate how creative and useful Ikea hacks were and how difficult it was to follow them. The purpose of the pretest was to find stimuli that were different in creativity (high vs. low) but similar in usefulness and difficulty. In the main study, one hundred twenty nine adults participated. They were randomly divided into two groups and shown two stimuli set which were similar in creativity to avoid unintended negative ratings of less creative stimuli in comparison and fatigue from rating four stimuli repetitively. An original Ikea product and creatively consumed stimulus were presented side by side. Then, the participants were asked to rate their creative consumption intention, functional and aesthetic value of the stimuli, perceived dexterity efficacy, creative consumption efficacy, and creativity of the stimuli. The five point Likert scales were used except of the creativity (7-point scales). In the last, gender and age were asked. The pretest and the main experiment were all conducted online.
The results using the four stimuli with different degrees of creativity showed that the creative consumption efficacy led people to perceive functional and aesthetic values from the creative consumption stimuli and this in turn affected the creative consumption intention. In addition, the dexterity efficacy moderated the effect of the creative consumption efficacy on value perception. The whole data corroborated these results and the three stimuli verified the mediation effects and the four, the moderated mediation effects, respectively.
The results suggest that individual difference such as creative consumption efficacy affects behavioral intention to consume creatively in reaction to pictures or videos of creative consumption in social media. Depending on the level of creative consumption efficacy people have, they perceive functional and aesthetic values of the same stimulus differently, and the greater the value, the more intentional they are to consume in the same way as others do.
So far, research on creative consumption efficacy has proposed the concept and developed and validated the measurement scale. Then, it has shown that the creative consumption efficacy mediated people to be involved in more creative consumption in the creatively displayed shopping environment. The purpose of this study was to examine the more direct effect of creative consumption efficacy, and as a result, it was found that the creative consumption efficiency increased the creative consumption intention by leading people to perceive the stimulus showing creative consumption more functionally and aesthetically valuable. These findings also show that the creative consumption culture can be spread by raising the value perception of creative consumption. Creative consumption efficacy is an individual difference and there is a limit to directly affecting it. However, the up-loading and sharing creative consumption contents through social media will enhance the social value of creative consumption, which could contribute to the cultural spread of creative consumption. Finally, future directions and limitations were discussed.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 안서원, "창의적 소비효능감 척도의 타당도 재검증: 창의성 과제 평가와 과제 제약의 효과" 한국소비자학회 29 (29): 1-17, 2018
2 임혜빈, "창의적 소비효능감 척도 개발과 타당화" 한국소비자학회 27 (27): 171-193, 2016
3 이하경, "창의적 매장 디스플레이가 창의적 소비행동에 미치는 영향: 창의적 소비효능감의 매개 효과를 중심으로" 한국소비자학회 29 (29): 77-95, 2018
4 김경자, "착한 소비 어디까지 해 봤니?"
5 이숙정, "소비가치에 영향을 주는 요인에 관한 연구:미디어 배양효과와 청소년의 소비사회화를 중심으로" 한국광고학회 24 (24): 257-275, 2013
6 Glăveanu, Vlad P., "What Can be Done with an Egg? Creativity, Material Objects, and the Theory of Affordances" 46 (46): 192-208, 2012
7 Gibson, James J., "The senses considered as perceptual systems" Houghton Mifflin 1966
8 Gibson, James J., "The ecological approach to visual perception" Erlbaum 1986
9 Betz, Nancy E., "The Expanded Skills Confidence Inventory : Measuring Basic Dimensions of Vocational Activity" 62 (62): 76-100, 2003
10 Dahlén, Micael, "The Consumer-perceived Value of Non-traditional Media : Effects of Brand Reputation, Appropriateness and Expense" 26 (26): 155-163, 2009
1 안서원, "창의적 소비효능감 척도의 타당도 재검증: 창의성 과제 평가와 과제 제약의 효과" 한국소비자학회 29 (29): 1-17, 2018
2 임혜빈, "창의적 소비효능감 척도 개발과 타당화" 한국소비자학회 27 (27): 171-193, 2016
3 이하경, "창의적 매장 디스플레이가 창의적 소비행동에 미치는 영향: 창의적 소비효능감의 매개 효과를 중심으로" 한국소비자학회 29 (29): 77-95, 2018
4 김경자, "착한 소비 어디까지 해 봤니?"
5 이숙정, "소비가치에 영향을 주는 요인에 관한 연구:미디어 배양효과와 청소년의 소비사회화를 중심으로" 한국광고학회 24 (24): 257-275, 2013
6 Glăveanu, Vlad P., "What Can be Done with an Egg? Creativity, Material Objects, and the Theory of Affordances" 46 (46): 192-208, 2012
7 Gibson, James J., "The senses considered as perceptual systems" Houghton Mifflin 1966
8 Gibson, James J., "The ecological approach to visual perception" Erlbaum 1986
9 Betz, Nancy E., "The Expanded Skills Confidence Inventory : Measuring Basic Dimensions of Vocational Activity" 62 (62): 76-100, 2003
10 Dahlén, Micael, "The Consumer-perceived Value of Non-traditional Media : Effects of Brand Reputation, Appropriateness and Expense" 26 (26): 155-163, 2009
11 Stajkovic, Alexander D., "Self-efficacy and Work-related Performance:A Meta-analysis" 124 (124): 240-261, 1998
12 Bandura, Albert, "Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency" 37 (37): 122-147, 1982
13 Bandura, Albert, "Self-efficacy : Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change" 84 (84): 191-215, 1977
14 Cropley, Arthur, "Resolving the Paradoxes of Creativity : An Extended Phase Model" 38 : 355-373, 2008
15 Woods, Walter A., "Psychological Dimensions of Consumer Decision" 24 : 15-19, 1960
16 Hayes, Andrew F., "Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis:A Regression-based Approach" The Guilford Press 2013
17 Borgianni, Yuri, "International Conference on Design, Simulation, Manufacturing: The Innovation Exchange" Springer, Cham 601-611, 2019
18 Bloch, Peter H., "Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics : Concept and Measurement" 29 (29): 551-565, 2003
19 Hirschman, Elizabeth C., "Hedonic Consumption : Emerging Concepts, Methods, and Propositions" 46 : 92-101, 1982
20 Burroughs, James E., "Handbook of Consumer Psychology" Psychology Press 1011-1038, 2008
21 Burroughs, James E., "Exploring Antecedents and Consequences of Consumer Creativity in a Problem-solving Context" 31 : 402-411, 2004
22 Knott, Stephen, "Design in the Age of Prosumption : The Craft of Design After the Object" 5 (5): 45-67, 2013
23 Desarbo, Wayne S., "Customer Value Analysis in a Heterogeneous Market" 22 (22): 845-857, 2001
24 Im, Subin, "Consumer Perception of Product Creativity, Coolness, Value and Attitude" 68 : 166-172, 2015
25 Preacher, Kristopher J., "Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses : Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions" 42 (42): 185-227, 2007
26 Sternberg, Robert J., "A Propulsion Model of Types of Creative Contributions" 3 (3): 83-100, 1999
국내결혼중개서비스 이용소비자의 가입단계별 이용 특성 및 소비자만족도
소비자는 언제 자기향상제품을 구매하는가?: 자기향상의 유형과 선망의 상호작용
치킨제품 인증표시에 대한 소비자 선호 평가: 이산선택모형의 적용
공유경제서비스 경험고객의 만족요인과 공유선호정도의 조절효과를 고려한 재이용의도에 관한 연구
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
1999-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.67 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
1.7 | 1.88 | 2.351 | 0.15 |