1968년 ‘프라하의 봄’에 대한 남북한의 인식과 반응

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article attempts how South Korea and North Korea responded to the so - called ‘Spring of Prague’ in Czechoslovakia in 1968. Especially, it tries to reveal the mutual relationship and the process of change of ‘Cold War - Korean Peninsula Division - Nationalism’ which spread on the Korean peninsula.
First of all, South Korea was called ‘Spring of Prague’ as liberalization, which was both a Anti-Communist perspective and the expansion of anti-Soviet policy in the Eastern Europe. On the other hand, from the point of view of North Korea, ‘Prague Spring’ was a counterrevolution to capitalism and a counterrevolution controlled by “US imperialism”. In August 1968, North Korea first agreed on the entry of Soviet troops into Czechoslovakia. In the meantime, North Korea emphasized the ‘Ju-Che(주체)’ that should maintain its sovereignty on its own. South Korea emphasized the ‘Self-Reliance(자주)’ of the interests of the nation and the nation because the entry of the Soviet forces into Czechoslovakia was a testament to the coercive domination of the ‘red imperialism’ on the weaker countries.
In 1968, the two Koreas, on the one hand, strengthened the existing Cold War logic. On the other hand, they tried to respond to the new Cold War. However, in 1968, the two Koreas did not stay in the existing Cold War strategy, which depends on powerful countries such as the US and the Soviet Union. South Korea emphasized self-reliance, including the establishment of a reserve forces. North Korea emphasized solidarity with smaller countries such as Cuba and Vietnam rather than a powerful country and advocated to fight boldly and independently. The international situation in 1968 is now a multi-polar period, and the fate of the weak countries must be defended on its own in a new Cold War era. Therefore, both North and South Korea are still looking forward to a new strategy of ‘self-reliance’ and ‘Ju-Che’, while still expecting the US and the Soviet Union.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 1968, 들끓었던 세계와 한반도
• 2. ‘프라하의 봄’
• 3. 소련·동독·폴란드·헝가리·불가리아 군의 체코 진입
• 4. 새로운 냉전시대, 남북한의 새로운 전략
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 로버트 E. 쿼크, "피델 카스트로" 홍익출판사 2002

2 션즈화, "최후의 천조" 선인 2017

3 "조선중앙연감"

4 박태균, "우방과 제국, 한미관계의 두 신화" 창비 2006

5 "우드로 윌슨센터 디지털아카이브"

6 블라디슬라프 M. 주보크, "실패한 제국―냉전시대 소련의 역사" 아카넷 2016

7 "서울신문"

8 리하르트 파버, "상상력에 권력을? 1968혁명의 평가" 메이데이 2008

9 신욱희, "삼각관계의 국제정치" 서울대학교출판문화원 2017

10 홍석률, "분단의 히스테리" 창비 2012

11 임영태, "북한50년사 ②" 들녘 1999

12 "로동신문"

13 권헌익, "또 하나의 냉전" 민음사 2013

14 "동아일보"

15 "대통령기록관 대통령 기록연구실"

16 이태섭, "김일성 리더십 연구" 들녘 2001

17 "근로자"

18 이마무라 히토시, "근대성의 구조" 민음사 1999

19 "경향신문"

20 Jonathan Haslam, "Russia’s Cold War" Yale University Press 2011

21 김연철, "70년의 대화―새로 읽는 남북관계사" 창비 2018

22 잉그리트 길혀-홀타이, "68혁명, 세계를 뒤흔든 상상력" 창비 2009

23 정현백, "68학생운동의 한국적 수용" 2008

24 송충기, "68운동과 그 역사화" 역사문제연구소 (78) : 48-67, 2007

25 고가영, "1968년 ‘프라하의 봄’과 소련의 저항운동" 한국서양사학회 (106) : 245-280, 2010

26 김도민, "1956년 헝가리 사태에 대한 남한의 인식과 대응" 역사문제연구소 (119) : 302-333, 2017