RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The WTO and the university: Globalization, GATS, and American higher education.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10605154

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        [S.l.]: Boston College 2005

      • 학위수여대학

        Boston College

      • 수여연도

        2005

      • 작성언어

        영어

      • 주제어
      • 학위

        Ph.D.

      • 페이지수

        312 p.

      • 지도교수/심사위원

        Chair: Philip G. Altbach.

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In December 2000, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) publicly released its initial negotiating proposal to remove barriers to trade in higher education services to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and its General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). This study explored the specific details of the GATS and examined the perceptions and opinions of the American higher education community and the federal government representatives most invested in the outcomes of the on-going GATS negotiations regarding higher education.
      This study involved qualitative research---document analysis, historical research, and interviews with government officials and representatives of the higher education 'industry'---culminating in a study of how American higher education responded to the potential liberalization of trade in higher education services through the GATS. The theory of the commodification of higher education---that higher education is increasingly being treated as a commercial product---emerged from the data as an explanation for both the USTR's decision to include higher education in a major trade agreement, as well as the widespread negative reaction of the higher education industry to free trade in higher education services.
      The study revealed that American higher education was initially unprepared for the challenges of addressing trade concerns, leaving the USTR to take its cues about higher education from an organization without representative input from the broad higher education community. It also exposed and examined the many serious concerns the higher education industry had, ranging from challenges to quality assurance standards to the rising influence of the for-profit sector to the blurring lines between public and private higher education. A particularly noteworthy observation was that just a few well-positioned individuals have been affecting broad international policy formation in regards to this issue. This research highlighted international trade as an important and relatively unexamined area in which globalization has impacted higher education in the United States and informed the nascent debate about the implications of international trade for American higher education.
      번역하기

      In December 2000, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) publicly released its initial negotiating proposal to remove barriers to trade in higher education services to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and its General Agreement ...

      In December 2000, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) publicly released its initial negotiating proposal to remove barriers to trade in higher education services to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and its General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). This study explored the specific details of the GATS and examined the perceptions and opinions of the American higher education community and the federal government representatives most invested in the outcomes of the on-going GATS negotiations regarding higher education.
      This study involved qualitative research---document analysis, historical research, and interviews with government officials and representatives of the higher education 'industry'---culminating in a study of how American higher education responded to the potential liberalization of trade in higher education services through the GATS. The theory of the commodification of higher education---that higher education is increasingly being treated as a commercial product---emerged from the data as an explanation for both the USTR's decision to include higher education in a major trade agreement, as well as the widespread negative reaction of the higher education industry to free trade in higher education services.
      The study revealed that American higher education was initially unprepared for the challenges of addressing trade concerns, leaving the USTR to take its cues about higher education from an organization without representative input from the broad higher education community. It also exposed and examined the many serious concerns the higher education industry had, ranging from challenges to quality assurance standards to the rising influence of the for-profit sector to the blurring lines between public and private higher education. A particularly noteworthy observation was that just a few well-positioned individuals have been affecting broad international policy formation in regards to this issue. This research highlighted international trade as an important and relatively unexamined area in which globalization has impacted higher education in the United States and informed the nascent debate about the implications of international trade for American higher education.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼