RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      주민참여형 도시재생의 거버넌스 비교분석 - 하이라인 공원(High Line Park)과 서울로7017의 사례를 중심으로 -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108619024

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      High Line Park is a well-known foreign case resident-participating urban regeneration led by the civic group Friends of High Line(FHL). Similarly Seoullo7017 is a case of domestic resident-participating urban regeneration that was inspired by High Line Park. To compare these two cases from the perspective of resident participation, the analysis was focused on primary objectives, activities, and governance relationship involved in the process. In particular, the governance subject was specified, and the relationship between the subjects and the role of the intermediate organization were mainly confirmed. Additionally, by comparing the specific differences between High Line Park and Seoullo7017, it present the long-term development strategy for practical resident-participating urban regeneration.
      번역하기

      High Line Park is a well-known foreign case resident-participating urban regeneration led by the civic group Friends of High Line(FHL). Similarly Seoullo7017 is a case of domestic resident-participating urban regeneration that was inspired by High Lin...

      High Line Park is a well-known foreign case resident-participating urban regeneration led by the civic group Friends of High Line(FHL). Similarly Seoullo7017 is a case of domestic resident-participating urban regeneration that was inspired by High Line Park. To compare these two cases from the perspective of resident participation, the analysis was focused on primary objectives, activities, and governance relationship involved in the process. In particular, the governance subject was specified, and the relationship between the subjects and the role of the intermediate organization were mainly confirmed. Additionally, by comparing the specific differences between High Line Park and Seoullo7017, it present the long-term development strategy for practical resident-participating urban regeneration.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 이론적 배경
      • 3. 개요 및 진행 과정
      • 4. 사례 분석
      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 이론적 배경
      • 3. 개요 및 진행 과정
      • 4. 사례 분석
      • 5. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼