戶籍制度의 변천과 새로운 身分登錄制度에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the Change of the Family Registry System and the New Identity Registry System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  The current great amendment of the family law(2005. 3) and the Constitutional Court of Korea’s judgment that the family head system is not agreed with the Constitutional Law has great historical significance, in that both of them will be impetus to a revolutionary change of the Korean family system. Now, it is urgent to amend and improve the Family Registration Act and related laws and institutions due to the abolition of the family head system under the Civil Law.<BR>  As a result of much repetitive discussion on alternatives to the systematization of family registry preparing for the abolition of the family head system so far, it seems reasonable that the two bills put forth respectively by Supreme Court of Korea and Ministry of Justice adopt the systematization of family registry on an individual basis for the realization of the constitutional ideas of individual dignity and gender equity, and for the complete protection of identity information. However, the bill introduced by Ministry of Justice has some problems to the effect that it requires more registry items put in the prospective family registry than in the present family registry for the purpose of the increase of administrative efficiency and convenience. Though, of course, such elements cannot be ignored entirely in consideration of the law system, the problems of fundamentals and principles should be seriously considered rather than convenience when we modify systems. This is because something can have influence on social life conversely as it, on its own, has had vitality, existing constantly even though social life is changed, if it is institutionalized as a basic principle.<BR>  Considering the properties of the systematization of family registry on an individual basis, the range of family should be minimized as far as possible. Furthermore, we should necessarily make up a maximal safeguard like the adoption of identity information protection measures that correspond to the presuppositions of information society, which can protect privacy completely. Much more research and examination are necessary in order to establish the best plan and bill that can resolve the problems centering around the present bills by considering the most neutral form in the present family relation. Thus, this study, after briefly investigating the process of the changes in the traditional Korean system of family registry, will examine conditions of discussion around the new identity registry system as a legislative task due to the abolition of the family head system, especially concentrating on the main contents of the new identity registry system put forth by Ministry of Justice.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
  Ⅱ. 우리나라 傳統的 戶籍制度의 연혁
  Ⅲ. 현행 戶籍法의 제정과 戶籍의 편제상 특징
  Ⅳ. 戶主制度의 폐지와 새로운 身分登錄制度
  Ⅴ. 맺는말
  《참고문헌》
  영어 초록
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "호주제폐지 및 기타 가족법개정사항에 관한 연구(Ⅱ)" (580) : 2005.6

2 "호주제폐지 및 기타 가족법개정사항에 관한 연구(Ⅰ)" (579) : 2005.5

3 "호주제를 폐지할 경우 민법 규정의 정비를 위한 검토" 한국가족법학회 17 (17): 2003.9

4 "호주제도의 폐지와 호적의 편제" 법조협회 1995

5 "호주제도의 역사와 전망" 대한변호사협회지 제81호 1982

6 "호주제는 우리민족의 전통가족제도인가?" 법문사 2006

7 "호주제 폐지후 그 대안에 관한 고찰" 2005

8 "호주제 폐지에 대비한 새로운 신분등록 편제방안 검토보고" 법원행정처 법정국 2005.1

9 "호적제도의 현상과 과제" 한국가족법학회 (11) : 1997

10 "호적실무요론" 한국사법행정학회 1996

11 "한국호적제도사 연구" 서울대학교 출판부 1997

12 "한국호적제도사 연구" 18 : 1973

13 "한국중세의 호적에 미친 당ㆍ송호적제도의 영향 한국사연구 제19호" 1978

14 "한국의 가족법에 있어서 일제잔재" 한국가족법학회 (9) : 1995.12

15 "한국가족법연구" 서울대학교 출판부 1967

16 "친족ㆍ상속법" 법문사 1998

17 "조선후기의 여성호주 연구- 慶尙道丹城縣戶籍大帳의 분석을 중심으로" 2000

18 "일제하의 가족정책과 관습법형성과정" 서울대 법학 33 (서울대 법학 33): 1992

19 "신분등록제도의 개선방향" 법문사 2006

20 "다시 호주제 폐지를 말한다(Ⅰ)" 법문사 2002

21 "개정민법(친족ㆍ상속법) 해설" 법문사 2006

22 "개인별 신분등록제에 관한 연구" 한국여성개발원 65 (65): 2003.11

23 "가족의 범위" 한국가족법학회 20 (20): 2006.3

24 "自由と定義 제37권 5호" 1986

25 "朝鮮戶籍法規詳解" 1924

26 "戶籍編製の原理 現代家族法大系 1" 有斐閣 1980

27 "序說 -戶籍と身分證書" 早稻田大學出版部 1996

28 "市民社会における市民登録制度に関する覚書" 信山社 2004