RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      장애인의무고용률 조정방안 = Adjustment Plan for the Mandatory Employment Rate of the Disabled

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77000037

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Employment opportunities for the disabled remain low in comparison topeople without disabilities in the labor market. Nevertheless, thestate-mandated employment rate for the disabled has been maintained at2% since 1993. Taking recent employment conditions for the disabled intoaccount, it is necessary to promote an increase in the mandatoryemployment rate for three reasons. First is the rapid increase in peoplewho are registered disabled. The ratio of those disabled to the totalpopulation has increased from 2.0% in 2000 to 4.5% in 2008. Second, when‘double counting’ (allowed for employers that employ the severely disabled)is implemented, the disabled employment rate will already exceed thepresent 2%. Third, the employment rate must be re-evaluated every 5 yearson the grounds of a 2004 law revision. It is for these three reasons thatthe employment rate mandate must be addressed.The mandatory employment rate of the disabled can be estimated usingfour methods. First is by means of the equalization of the employmentrate. This equalizes the employment rate between disabled people andthose without disabilities in order to decide where to set the level of themandatory employment rate. Using this method, the estimated rate ofemployment emerges as 8.81%. Another approach is to instead analyze theequalization of the unemployment rate. Then, the estimated outcome is2.80%. Third, one can apply an equalization of the labor-force participationrate. The estimated outcome using this approach is 7.72%. It becomes 6.07%when the number of unemployed includes those job-seekers who havetemporarily postponed their search. The last approach follows a Japaneseestimation model. The calculated outcome resolves to 3.78% whenconsidering only the regular employee - 3.40% when considering theregular employee and the temporary employee. It becomes 3.64% whenconsidering the regular employee, the temporary employee and dayworkers.
      번역하기

      Employment opportunities for the disabled remain low in comparison topeople without disabilities in the labor market. Nevertheless, thestate-mandated employment rate for the disabled has been maintained at2% since 1993. Taking recent employment condit...

      Employment opportunities for the disabled remain low in comparison topeople without disabilities in the labor market. Nevertheless, thestate-mandated employment rate for the disabled has been maintained at2% since 1993. Taking recent employment conditions for the disabled intoaccount, it is necessary to promote an increase in the mandatoryemployment rate for three reasons. First is the rapid increase in peoplewho are registered disabled. The ratio of those disabled to the totalpopulation has increased from 2.0% in 2000 to 4.5% in 2008. Second, when‘double counting’ (allowed for employers that employ the severely disabled)is implemented, the disabled employment rate will already exceed thepresent 2%. Third, the employment rate must be re-evaluated every 5 yearson the grounds of a 2004 law revision. It is for these three reasons thatthe employment rate mandate must be addressed.The mandatory employment rate of the disabled can be estimated usingfour methods. First is by means of the equalization of the employmentrate. This equalizes the employment rate between disabled people andthose without disabilities in order to decide where to set the level of themandatory employment rate. Using this method, the estimated rate ofemployment emerges as 8.81%. Another approach is to instead analyze theequalization of the unemployment rate. Then, the estimated outcome is2.80%. Third, one can apply an equalization of the labor-force participationrate. The estimated outcome using this approach is 7.72%. It becomes 6.07%when the number of unemployed includes those job-seekers who havetemporarily postponed their search. The last approach follows a Japaneseestimation model. The calculated outcome resolves to 3.78% whenconsidering only the regular employee - 3.40% when considering theregular employee and the temporary employee. It becomes 3.64% whenconsidering the regular employee, the temporary employee and dayworkers.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼