RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Agonistic Democracy and Education.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15819380

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this dissertation I articulate the affinities between the agonistic political philosophy of William Connolly and the educational philosophy of John Dewey in order to develop terms for a philosophy of education for agonistic democracy. I argue both...

      In this dissertation I articulate the affinities between the agonistic political philosophy of William Connolly and the educational philosophy of John Dewey in order to develop terms for a philosophy of education for agonistic democracy. I argue both that Dewey offers a needed and appropriate educational philosophical framework for Connolly’s agonistic political theory and that Connolly’s work on agonism provides valuable terms for reconstructing Dewey’s educational philosophy. My argument turns initially upon a critique of what I call the “secular ideal” in the liberal political philosophical tradition, motivating both a turn to Connolly’s agonistic political thought and the important role that the concept of “faith” plays in his understanding of political conflict which avoids the anti-pluralizing tendency of “antagonism” born from secularist and non-secularist dogmatisms. I demonstrate that Dewey’s work similarly affirms a central role for a concept of faith that challenges interpretations of his political and, thus, educational work as retaining a problematic secular ideal. I argue, further, that despite skepticism from both political and educational philosophers with an interest in agonism that Dewey’s work reflects the secularist and liberal political theories they reject, Dewey’s concepts of “inquiry” and “educative growth” contain deep and broad theoretical development of the ever-present role of conflict in political life. This dissertation challenges readers of Dewey’s work who fail sufficiently to appreciate and attend to the persistent place of conflict in his work and its potential for serving what Connolly calls democratic “pluralization.” Ultimately, I argue that a reconstruction of Dewey’s concept of growth in more explicitly agonistic terms allows for an articulation of educative conflict in formal education that is not developed in Dewey’s own educational writings but may serve a philosophy of education for pluralistic democracies.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼