자유유동 마하수 2.4인 초음속 유동에서 형성되는 경사충격파에 의하여 난류경계층이 박리될 수 있다. 이때 박리유동의 제어를 위하여 다양한 유동제어 기술이 적용될 때 나타나는 박리유동...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108855024
2023
Korean
KCI우수등재,SCOPUS,ESCI
학술저널
841-848(8쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드자유유동 마하수 2.4인 초음속 유동에서 형성되는 경사충격파에 의하여 난류경계층이 박리될 수 있다. 이때 박리유동의 제어를 위하여 다양한 유동제어 기술이 적용될 때 나타나는 박리유동...
자유유동 마하수 2.4인 초음속 유동에서 형성되는 경사충격파에 의하여 난류경계층이 박리될 수 있다. 이때 박리유동의 제어를 위하여 다양한 유동제어 기술이 적용될 때 나타나는 박리유동의 비정상성 특성변화가 실험적으로 관찰되었다. 경계층의 박리지점 전방에 제트분출을 이용하는 고전적인 제어장치와 최근 개발된 초음속 유체진동기 제어장치가 각각 위치할 때 나타나는 박리기포의 진동특성이 비교 분석되었다. 각 제어장치들의 위치와 제어압력 변화에 따른 후방 경계층 박리유동의 비정상적 특성의 비교를 위하여 고속응답 압력센서 측정과 얻어진 신호에 대한 통계처리 분석기법이 사용되었고, 특정 운용조건에서 유체진동기가 갖는 우수한 제어성능을 확인하였다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In supersonic flows with a freestream Mach number of 2.4, the turbulent boundary layer could be separated by an oblique shock wave. The characteristics of the unsteadiness change of the separated flow were experimentally observed when various flow con...
In supersonic flows with a freestream Mach number of 2.4, the turbulent boundary layer could be separated by an oblique shock wave. The characteristics of the unsteadiness change of the separated flow were experimentally observed when various flow control techniques were applied to control the separated flows. The unsteadiness of the separated flows were analyzed and compared for two different control techniques applied ahead of the separation location; a conventional control technique using supersonic jet ejection and a recently developed supersonic fluidic oscillator. Measurement of high-frequency response pressure guages and statistical analysis of the measured signals were employed to compare the unsteadiness of the separated flows for various locations and control pressures of the control devices, and the fluidic oscillator operated in a specific condition was observed to have favorable control performances.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 박상훈 ; 이열, "경사충격파 박리유동 제어를 위한 초음속 진동제트 분출위치의 영향성 연구" 한국항공우주학회 50 (50): 747-754, 2022
2 Garg, S., "Unsteady Pressure Loads Generated by Swept-Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions" 34 (34): 1174-1181, 1996
3 Dussauge, J. P., "Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with separation" 10 (10): 85-91, 2006
4 Welch, P. D., "The Use of Fast Fourier Transform for the Estimation of Power Spectra : A Method Based on Time Averaging Over Short, Modified Periodograms" 15 (15): 70-73, 1967
5 Lin, J. C., "Testing of High-Lift Common Research Model with Integrated Active Flow Control" 57 (57): 1121-1133, 2020
6 Dupont, P., "Space and time organization in a shock-induced separated boundary layer" 559 : 255-277, 2006
7 Delery, J., "Some physical aspects of shock wave/boundary layer interactions" 19 : 453-468, 2009
8 Gan, T., "Shock wave boundary layer interaction controlled by surface arc plasma actuators" 30 : 055107-, 2018
9 Aram, S., "Numerical Comparison Between Steady and Sweeping Jets for Active Flow Control Applications" 2018
10 Babinsky, H., "Microramp Control of Supersonic Oblique Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions" 47 (47): 668-675, 2009
1 박상훈 ; 이열, "경사충격파 박리유동 제어를 위한 초음속 진동제트 분출위치의 영향성 연구" 한국항공우주학회 50 (50): 747-754, 2022
2 Garg, S., "Unsteady Pressure Loads Generated by Swept-Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions" 34 (34): 1174-1181, 1996
3 Dussauge, J. P., "Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with separation" 10 (10): 85-91, 2006
4 Welch, P. D., "The Use of Fast Fourier Transform for the Estimation of Power Spectra : A Method Based on Time Averaging Over Short, Modified Periodograms" 15 (15): 70-73, 1967
5 Lin, J. C., "Testing of High-Lift Common Research Model with Integrated Active Flow Control" 57 (57): 1121-1133, 2020
6 Dupont, P., "Space and time organization in a shock-induced separated boundary layer" 559 : 255-277, 2006
7 Delery, J., "Some physical aspects of shock wave/boundary layer interactions" 19 : 453-468, 2009
8 Gan, T., "Shock wave boundary layer interaction controlled by surface arc plasma actuators" 30 : 055107-, 2018
9 Aram, S., "Numerical Comparison Between Steady and Sweeping Jets for Active Flow Control Applications" 2018
10 Babinsky, H., "Microramp Control of Supersonic Oblique Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions" 47 (47): 668-675, 2009
11 van Oudheusden, B. W., "Investigation of the unsteadiness of a shock-reflection interaction with time-resolved particle image velocimetry" 21 : 397-409, 2011
12 Woszidlo, R., "Fundamental Properties of Fluidic Oscillators for Flow Control Applications" 57 (57): 978-992, 2019
13 Doerffer, P., "Flow Control Effect on Unsteadiness of Shock Wave Induced Separation" 22 (22): 511-516, 2013
14 Dolling, D. S., "Fifty Years of Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Research: What Next?" 39 (39): 1517-1531, 2001
15 Ramaswamy, D. P., "Effects of Jet-to-Jet Spacing of Air-Jet Vortex Generators in Shock-Induced Flow-Separation Control" 109 : 35-64, 2022
16 Souverein, L. J., "Effect of air jet vortex generators on a shock wave boundary layer interaction" 49 : 1053-1064, 2010
17 Narayanaswamy, V., "Control of unsteadiness of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction by using a pulsed-plasma-jet actuator" 24 : 076101-, 2012
18 Webb, N., "Control of oblique shock wave/boundary layer interactions using plasma actuators" 54 : 1545-, 2013
19 Chidambaranathan, M., "Control of incident shock-induced boundary-layer separation using steady micro-jet actuators at M∞=3.5" 233 (233): 1284-1306, 2018
20 Verma, S. B., "Control of Incident Shock-Induced Separation Using Vane-Type Vortex-Generating Devices" 56 (56): 1600-1615, 2018
21 Verma, S. B., "Control of Compression-Ramp-Induced Interaction with Steady Microjets" 57 (57): 2892-2904, 2019
22 Koklu, M., "Comparison ofSweeping Jet Actuators with Different Flow-Control Techniques for Flow-Separation Control" 55 (55): 848-860, 2017
인장스프링을 이용한 모터 직접 구동형 곤충 모방 날갯짓 비행체의 동작 시험
희박기체 유동 해석에 대한 CFD와 Kinetic 모델의 비교 연구
주요국 우주기관의 미션 분석과 한국 우주항공청에 대한 함의