국립중앙도서관 "우편 복사 서비스"로 연결 됩니다.
KCIBackground: Recently, ultrasound guidance in clinical procedures including brachial plexus block has gained popularity. This method has been considered to be an efficient and a useful method with real-time visualization. Many reports have showed th...
다국어 입력
あ
ぁ
か
が
さ
ざ
た
だ
な
は
ば
ぱ
ま
や
ゃ
ら
わ
ゎ
ん
い
ぃ
き
ぎ
し
じ
ち
ぢ
に
ひ
び
ぴ
み
り
う
ぅ
く
ぐ
す
ず
つ
づ
っ
ぬ
ふ
ぶ
ぷ
む
ゆ
ゅ
る
え
ぇ
け
げ
せ
ぜ
て
で
ね
へ
べ
ぺ
め
れ
お
ぉ
こ
ご
そ
ぞ
と
ど
の
ほ
ぼ
ぽ
も
よ
ょ
ろ
を
ア
ァ
カ
サ
ザ
タ
ダ
ナ
ハ
バ
パ
マ
ヤ
ャ
ラ
ワ
ヮ
ン
イ
ィ
キ
ギ
シ
ジ
チ
ヂ
ニ
ヒ
ビ
ピ
ミ
リ
ウ
ゥ
ク
グ
ス
ズ
ツ
ヅ
ッ
ヌ
フ
ブ
プ
ム
ユ
ュ
ル
エ
ェ
ケ
ゲ
セ
ゼ
テ
デ
ヘ
ベ
ペ
メ
レ
オ
ォ
コ
ゴ
ソ
ゾ
ト
ド
ノ
ホ
ボ
ポ
モ
ヨ
ョ
ロ
ヲ
―
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
예시)
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
А
Б
В
Г
Д
Е
Ё
Ж
З
И
Й
К
Л
М
Н
О
П
Р
С
Т
У
Ф
Х
Ц
Ч
Ш
Щ
Ъ
Ы
Ь
Э
Ю
Я
а
б
в
г
д
е
ё
ж
з
и
й
к
л
м
н
о
п
р
с
т
у
ф
х
ц
ч
ш
щ
ъ
ы
ь
э
ю
я
′
″
℃
Å
￠
￡
￥
¤
℉
‰
＄
％
Ｆ
￦
㎕
㎖
㎗
ℓ
㎘
㏄
㎣
㎤
㎥
㎦
㎙
㎚
㎛
㎜
㎝
㎞
㎟
㎠
㎡
㎢
㏊
㎍
㎎
㎏
㏏
㎈
㎉
㏈
㎧
㎨
㎰
㎱
㎲
㎳
㎴
㎵
㎶
㎷
㎸
㎹
㎀
㎁
㎂
㎃
㎄
㎺
㎻
㎽
㎾
㎿
㎐
㎑
㎒
㎓
㎔
Ω
㏀
㏁
㎊
㎋
㎌
㏖
㏅
㎭
㎮
㎯
㏛
㎩
㎪
㎫
㎬
㏝
㏐
㏓
㏃
㏉
㏜
㏆
RISS 인기검색어
초음파를 이용한 빗장아래 접근법을 통한 팔신경얼기차단의 유용성: 신경자극기를 이용한 방법과의 비교 = Usefulness of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a comparison with nerve stimulation method
한글로보기https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104351560
- 저자
- 발행기관
- 학술지명
- 권호사항
-
발행연도
2008
-
작성언어
Korean
- 주제어
-
등재정보
KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
-
자료형태
학술저널
- 발행기관 URL
-
수록면
436-440(5쪽)
-
KCI 피인용횟수
6
- 제공처
-
0
상세조회 -
0
다운로드
부가정보
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Background: Recently, ultrasound guidance in clinical procedures including brachial plexus block has gained popularity. This method has been considered to be an efficient and a useful method with real-time visualization. Many reports have showed the usefulness of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block. We evaluated the usefulness of ultrasound guidance in infraclavicular brachial plexus block compared with nerve stimulation.
Methods: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups of US group (ultrasound-guided block) and NS group (nerve stimulation). Blocks were performed with mepivacaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1：200,000 (total volume 40 ml). Block execution time, onset time, success rate, patient's discomfort and complications were measured and statistically evaluated for the comparison.
Results: Block execution time were 88.3 ± 48.1 sec in US group and 172.7 ± 103.1 sec in group NS, respectively (P = 0.017). Onset time were 16.0 ± 6.9 min and 17.7 ± 7.8 min (P = 0.434). Success rates were 93.3% and 80.0% (P = 0.283). Patient's discomfort was not significantly different. Pain in patients with fractured arm was significantly lower in US group (P = 0.004).
Conclusions: An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block is useful with less time consumption and less discomfort in patients with fracture of arm. Success rate and onset time were acceptable.
Methods: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups of US group (ultrasound-guided block) and NS group (nerve stimulation). Blocks were performed with mepivacaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1：200,000 (total volume 40 ml). Block execution time, onset time, success rate, patient's discomfort and complications were measured and statistically evaluated for the comparison.
Results: Block execution time were 88.3 ± 48.1 sec in US group and 172.7 ± 103.1 sec in group NS, respectively (P = 0.017). Onset time were 16.0 ± 6.9 min and 17.7 ± 7.8 min (P = 0.434). Success rates were 93.3% and 80.0% (P = 0.283). Patient's discomfort was not significantly different. Pain in patients with fractured arm was significantly lower in US group (P = 0.004).
Conclusions: An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block is useful with less time consumption and less discomfort in patients with fracture of arm. Success rate and onset time were acceptable.
Background: Recently, ultrasound guidance in clinical procedures including brachial plexus block has gained popularity. This method has been considered to be an efficient and a useful method with real-time visualization. Many reports have showed the usefulness of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block. We evaluated the usefulness of ultrasound guidance in infraclavicular brachial plexus block compared with nerve stimulation.
Methods: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups of US group (ultrasound-guided block) and NS group (nerve stimulation). Blocks were performed with mepivacaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1：200,000 (total volume 40 ml). Block execution time, onset time, success rate, patient's discomfort and complications were measured and statistically evaluated for the comparison.
Results: Block execution time were 88.3 ± 48.1 sec in US group and 172.7 ± 103.1 sec in group NS, respectively (P = 0.017). Onset time were 16.0 ± 6.9 min and 17.7 ± 7.8 min (P = 0.434). Success rates were 93.3% and 80.0% (P = 0.283). Patient's discomfort was not significantly different. Pain in patients with fractured arm was significantly lower in US group (P = 0.004).
Conclusions: An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block is useful with less time consumption and less discomfort in patients with fracture of arm. Success rate and onset time were acceptable.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Background: Recently, ultrasound guidance in clinical procedures including brachial plexus block has gained popularity. This method has been considered to be an efficient and a useful method with real-time visualization. Many reports have showed the usefulness of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block. We evaluated the usefulness of ultrasound guidance in infraclavicular brachial plexus block compared with nerve stimulation.
Methods: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups of US group (ultrasound-guided block) and NS group (nerve stimulation). Blocks were performed with mepivacaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1：200,000 (total volume 40 ml). Block execution time, onset time, success rate, patient's discomfort and complications were measured and statistically evaluated for the comparison.
Results: Block execution time were 88.3 ± 48.1 sec in US group and 172.7 ± 103.1 sec in group NS, respectively (P = 0.017). Onset time were 16.0 ± 6.9 min and 17.7 ± 7.8 min (P = 0.434). Success rates were 93.3% and 80.0% (P = 0.283). Patient's discomfort was not significantly different. Pain in patients with fractured arm was significantly lower in US group (P = 0.004).
Conclusions: An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block is useful with less time consumption and less discomfort in patients with fracture of arm. Success rate and onset time were acceptable.
Methods: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups of US group (ultrasound-guided block) and NS group (nerve stimulation). Blocks were performed with mepivacaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1：200,000 (total volume 40 ml). Block execution time, onset time, success rate, patient's discomfort and complications were measured and statistically evaluated for the comparison.
Results: Block execution time were 88.3 ± 48.1 sec in US group and 172.7 ± 103.1 sec in group NS, respectively (P = 0.017). Onset time were 16.0 ± 6.9 min and 17.7 ± 7.8 min (P = 0.434). Success rates were 93.3% and 80.0% (P = 0.283). Patient's discomfort was not significantly different. Pain in patients with fractured arm was significantly lower in US group (P = 0.004).
Conclusions: An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block is useful with less time consumption and less discomfort in patients with fracture of arm. Success rate and onset time were acceptable.
Background: Recently, ultrasound guidance in clinical procedures including brachial plexus block has gained popularity. This method has been considered to be an efficient and a useful method with real-time visualization. Many reports have showed th...
Background: Recently, ultrasound guidance in clinical procedures including brachial plexus block has gained popularity. This method has been considered to be an efficient and a useful method with real-time visualization. Many reports have showed the usefulness of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block. We evaluated the usefulness of ultrasound guidance in infraclavicular brachial plexus block compared with nerve stimulation.
Methods: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups of US group (ultrasound-guided block) and NS group (nerve stimulation). Blocks were performed with mepivacaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1：200,000 (total volume 40 ml). Block execution time, onset time, success rate, patient's discomfort and complications were measured and statistically evaluated for the comparison.
Results: Block execution time were 88.3 ± 48.1 sec in US group and 172.7 ± 103.1 sec in group NS, respectively (P = 0.017). Onset time were 16.0 ± 6.9 min and 17.7 ± 7.8 min (P = 0.434). Success rates were 93.3% and 80.0% (P = 0.283). Patient's discomfort was not significantly different. Pain in patients with fractured arm was significantly lower in US group (P = 0.004).
Conclusions: An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block is useful with less time consumption and less discomfort in patients with fracture of arm. Success rate and onset time were acceptable.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Arcand G, "Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular versus supraclavicular block" 101 : 886-890, 2005
2 Sandhu NS, "Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block" 89 : 254-259, 2002
3 Williams SR, "Ultrasound guidance speeds execution and improves the quality of supraclavicular block" 97 : 1518-1523, 2003
4 Sites BD, "Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of a perivascular axillary plexus block" 50 : 678-684, 2006
5 Chan VW, "Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block" 54 : 176-182, 2007
6 Kapral S, "Ultrasonographic guidance improves the success rate of interscalene brachial plexus blockade" 33 : 253-258, 2008
7 Lecamwasam H, "Stimulation of the posterior cord predicts successful infraclavicular block" 102 : 1564-1568, 2006
8 Bloc S, "Spread of injectate associated with radial or median nerve-type motor response during infraclavicular brachial- plexus block: an ultrasound evaluation" 32 : 130-135, 2007
9 Bloc S, "Single-stimulation, low-volume infraclavicular plexus block: influence of the evoked distal motor response on success rate" 31 : 433-437, 2006
10 Dingemans E, "Neurostimulation in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: a prospective randomized trial" 104 : 1275-1280, 2007
1 Arcand G, "Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular versus supraclavicular block" 101 : 886-890, 2005
2 Sandhu NS, "Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block" 89 : 254-259, 2002
3 Williams SR, "Ultrasound guidance speeds execution and improves the quality of supraclavicular block" 97 : 1518-1523, 2003
4 Sites BD, "Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of a perivascular axillary plexus block" 50 : 678-684, 2006
5 Chan VW, "Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block" 54 : 176-182, 2007
6 Kapral S, "Ultrasonographic guidance improves the success rate of interscalene brachial plexus blockade" 33 : 253-258, 2008
7 Lecamwasam H, "Stimulation of the posterior cord predicts successful infraclavicular block" 102 : 1564-1568, 2006
8 Bloc S, "Spread of injectate associated with radial or median nerve-type motor response during infraclavicular brachial- plexus block: an ultrasound evaluation" 32 : 130-135, 2007
9 Bloc S, "Single-stimulation, low-volume infraclavicular plexus block: influence of the evoked distal motor response on success rate" 31 : 433-437, 2006
10 Dingemans E, "Neurostimulation in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: a prospective randomized trial" 104 : 1275-1280, 2007
11 Kapral S, "Lateral infraclavicular plexus block vs. axillary block for hand and forearm surgery" 43 : 1047-1052, 1999
12 Wilson JL, "Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: parasagittal anatomy important to the coracoid technique" 87 : 870-873, 1998
13 Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, "Infraclavicular block causes less discomfort than axillary block in ambulatory patients" 49 : 1030-1034, 2005
14 Franco CD, "Gross anatomy of the brachial plexus sheath in human cadavers" 33 : 64-69, 2008
15 Levesque S, "Endpoint for successful, ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block" 55 : 308-309, 2008
16 Sauter AR, "Electrical nerve stimulation or ultrasound guidance for lateral sagittal infraclavicular blocks: a randomized, controlled, observer- blinded, comparative study" 106 : 1910-1915, 2008
17 Dae Geun Jeon, "Clinical Evaluation of Infraclavicular Block via a Coracoid Approach" 대한마취과학회 51 (51): 6-10, 2006
18 Borgeat A, "An evaluation of the infraclavicular block via a modified approach of the Raj technique" 93 : 436-441, 2001
동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문
-
간 이식 수술 마취 중에 발생한 상대정맥 천공 —증례보고—
- 대한마취통증의학회
- 서귀주
- 2008
- KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
-
제왕절개술을 위한 전신마취 시 사용된 Sevoflurane과 Desflurane이 산모와 태아에 미치는 영향
- 대한마취통증의학회
- 이인화
- 2008
- KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
-
완전 방실차단 환자에서 다빈치 수술 로봇을 이용한 영구 심박동기 삽입술 중 발생한 심낭 압전 -증례보고-
- 대한마취통증의학회
- 박영수
- 2008
- KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
-
Effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on hemodynamic changes during tracheal intubation
- 대한마취통증의학회
- 박선영
- 2008
- KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
분석정보
인용정보 인용지수 설명보기
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 평가예정 | 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
| 2013-11-27 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 | |
| 2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
| 2010-07-20 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology | |
| 2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
| 2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | |
| 2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
| 2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) |  |
| 2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.1 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.01 |
이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료
나만을 위한 추천자료
