RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      成就動機의 强度와 自我槪念과의 關係 = Relationships between the strength of achievement motive and self concept

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T3740112

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      1. Preblem and Hypotheses
      This investigation is concerned with various aspects of self concept and differences in the strength of achievement motive. Defined in general terms as "competition with a standard of excellence", the concept of achievement motivation has been developed through the exploretory study and theoretical formulations of Mcclelland, D.C. and Atkinson, J.W. and his coleagues
      Their researches had produced an instrument for measuring the achievement motive which is based on Thematic Apperception Test. And the presence or absence of experimental cues in the achievement oriented condition and relaxed condition respectively seems to make a difference in p. Achievement motive scores. Generally speaking, achievement motivation is experimentally increased and the imaginative stories that subjects write, become increasingly more concerned with achievement.
      The result of the previous studies by Weinberger, B. or Motirc, J.G. suggested that people with strong generalized achievement motivation would show a high discrepaney between ideal Self and Actual self ratings
      Rony writer have mentioned both the integrative and conflictive aspects of the self. Definitions are varied and are often based on general observation rather than on emprical evidence. Although there are differences in the way the self is defined, there is agreement that conflict among selves, conscious or unconscious, may exist. The main point is the degree to which different perceptions of self may be or need to be integrated in order for an individual to achieve a particular level of adjustment or maturity.
      This investigation attempted to test the following hypotheses.
      A. The HH subgroup will have greater conflicts of self than each of the other three subgroups. To test this hypothesis, two sub-hypotheses are structured in testable forms
      (1) The HH subgroup will have a higher discrepancy scores between the Ideal Self ratings and Actual Self ratings than each of the other three groups. (2) The HH subgroup will have lower correlation between the Ideal and Actual Self ratings than the others.
      B. The correlation between the achievement motive scores and Ideal Self ratings will be higher than that between n. Ach. Scores and Actual Self ratings in all subjects.
      C. The correlation between n. Achievement Motive scores and evaluation factor scores of self rating dimension in the HH subgroup will be higher than that between n. Achievement Motive scores and potency or activity factor scores.
      2. Experimental design, Instrument and Sampling.
      The plan of this study was to classify the subjects in two separate periods under relaxed and achievement oriented experimental conditions and to obtain measures of n. Achievement Motive and Self Concept on each experimental conditions. The achievement motive was measured by Thematic Apperception Test.
      The measures of self concept were adapted from Weinberger's Self Concept rating scale. Weinberger's Self Concept rating scale consisted of 26 traits put in this study 6 traits are excluded, because the expression translated into Korean had ambiguous implication. Ideal self Concept and Actual Self Concept were measured in this self concept rating. The three aspects of the self concept that are activity, evaluation and potency were measured by applying semantic Differential Technique.
      The 71 subjects were high school boys and 26 were cadets of the Air Force military Academy in Korea.
      The subgroups classified by strength of n. Achievement Motive were 33 subjects in HH, 18 in HL, 17 in LH and 29 in LL subgroup.
      3. Results
      These are the results of this study.
      (1) The discrepancy between the Ideal Self rating and Actual Self rating in HH subgroup were significantly higher than that of the other three groups.
      (2) The correlation of the Ideal Self rating and Actual self rating in HH subgroup were significantly lower than that of the others. These two results clarify Weinberger's tentative finding that achievement motivation affects the self esteem of people with unstable self concept.
      (3) The correlation between the achievement motive scores and Ideal Self ratings were significantly higher than that of the n. Achievement Motive scores and Actual Self ratings in all subgroups.
      (4) The correlations between achievement score and evaluation factor scores in self rating dimension by Sematic Differential Technique were significantly higher than that between the n. Achievement Motive and potency or activity factor scores.

      번역하기

      1. Preblem and Hypotheses This investigation is concerned with various aspects of self concept and differences in the strength of achievement motive. Defined in general terms as "competition with a standard of excellence", the concept of achievement ...

      1. Preblem and Hypotheses
      This investigation is concerned with various aspects of self concept and differences in the strength of achievement motive. Defined in general terms as "competition with a standard of excellence", the concept of achievement motivation has been developed through the exploretory study and theoretical formulations of Mcclelland, D.C. and Atkinson, J.W. and his coleagues
      Their researches had produced an instrument for measuring the achievement motive which is based on Thematic Apperception Test. And the presence or absence of experimental cues in the achievement oriented condition and relaxed condition respectively seems to make a difference in p. Achievement motive scores. Generally speaking, achievement motivation is experimentally increased and the imaginative stories that subjects write, become increasingly more concerned with achievement.
      The result of the previous studies by Weinberger, B. or Motirc, J.G. suggested that people with strong generalized achievement motivation would show a high discrepaney between ideal Self and Actual self ratings
      Rony writer have mentioned both the integrative and conflictive aspects of the self. Definitions are varied and are often based on general observation rather than on emprical evidence. Although there are differences in the way the self is defined, there is agreement that conflict among selves, conscious or unconscious, may exist. The main point is the degree to which different perceptions of self may be or need to be integrated in order for an individual to achieve a particular level of adjustment or maturity.
      This investigation attempted to test the following hypotheses.
      A. The HH subgroup will have greater conflicts of self than each of the other three subgroups. To test this hypothesis, two sub-hypotheses are structured in testable forms
      (1) The HH subgroup will have a higher discrepancy scores between the Ideal Self ratings and Actual Self ratings than each of the other three groups. (2) The HH subgroup will have lower correlation between the Ideal and Actual Self ratings than the others.
      B. The correlation between the achievement motive scores and Ideal Self ratings will be higher than that between n. Ach. Scores and Actual Self ratings in all subjects.
      C. The correlation between n. Achievement Motive scores and evaluation factor scores of self rating dimension in the HH subgroup will be higher than that between n. Achievement Motive scores and potency or activity factor scores.
      2. Experimental design, Instrument and Sampling.
      The plan of this study was to classify the subjects in two separate periods under relaxed and achievement oriented experimental conditions and to obtain measures of n. Achievement Motive and Self Concept on each experimental conditions. The achievement motive was measured by Thematic Apperception Test.
      The measures of self concept were adapted from Weinberger's Self Concept rating scale. Weinberger's Self Concept rating scale consisted of 26 traits put in this study 6 traits are excluded, because the expression translated into Korean had ambiguous implication. Ideal self Concept and Actual Self Concept were measured in this self concept rating. The three aspects of the self concept that are activity, evaluation and potency were measured by applying semantic Differential Technique.
      The 71 subjects were high school boys and 26 were cadets of the Air Force military Academy in Korea.
      The subgroups classified by strength of n. Achievement Motive were 33 subjects in HH, 18 in HL, 17 in LH and 29 in LL subgroup.
      3. Results
      These are the results of this study.
      (1) The discrepancy between the Ideal Self rating and Actual Self rating in HH subgroup were significantly higher than that of the other three groups.
      (2) The correlation of the Ideal Self rating and Actual self rating in HH subgroup were significantly lower than that of the others. These two results clarify Weinberger's tentative finding that achievement motivation affects the self esteem of people with unstable self concept.
      (3) The correlation between the achievement motive scores and Ideal Self ratings were significantly higher than that of the n. Achievement Motive scores and Actual Self ratings in all subgroups.
      (4) The correlations between achievement score and evaluation factor scores in self rating dimension by Sematic Differential Technique were significantly higher than that between the n. Achievement Motive and potency or activity factor scores.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 目次
      • I. 序論 = 1
      • II. 問題 = 2
      • A. 理論的 背景 = 2
      • B. 槪念模型 = 18
      • 目次
      • I. 序論 = 1
      • II. 問題 = 2
      • A. 理論的 背景 = 2
      • B. 槪念模型 = 18
      • C. 假說 = 23
      • III. 硏究方法 = 27
      • A. 實驗方案 = 27
      • B. 標集 = 31
      • C. 道具 = 33
      • IV. 結果 = 41
      • V. 論議 = 52
      • VI. 要約 및 結論 = 59
      • 參考文獻 = 63
      • 英文抄錄 = 1
      • 附錄 = 4
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼