RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      노사자치의 한계와 노동법적 규제의 정당성 = Limitation on Labor-Management Autonomy and Justness of Regulation Based on a Labor Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45003308

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      According to the constitutional law, a labor law was established on the basis of particular labor standards laws and collective labor and management relations laws. The former deals with the lowest criterion and the latter is premised on the security of union rights of labor groups But there still has not been enough reviews theoretically on how the labor law can control particular contract-autonomy and collective labor-management autonomy, on what the basis of the law is, and on what limitation is. To solve these problems, it is needed to have a feeling of danger of flexibility and regulation-relaxation on a labor law and to bring a question on a legal foundation and limitation on intervention of a substantial law in the labor law
      Therefore, putting a emphasis on collective labor and management relations laws and private contract-autonomy and putting limitation on the act of a substantial law as a whole, this research is to investigate legal intervention by the substantial law and the relationship of management and unions autonomy On the other hand, we can find two different opinions on a basic standard. One is management and unions autonomy. The other one is a legal intervention by a state They depend on whether they are related to the laws in article 32, clause 2 and article 33, clause 1 of a constitution, and on how they define self-determination service relation and the actual condition of labor union in term of how a labor union works It organically and it deals with illegal labor acts. In conclusion, this study is to review decision system on labor condition comprehensively, clarifying a clear mutual relation from three points of view, a substantial law, a collective, and a private.
      The labor law has to contribute to the change of existing labor union's conditions and workers' awareness on their right. But every other problem caused separately should also be considered in a proper way. Accordingly, this study has a Significance of looking in contemporary opinions on systematic sentiments of protection device for workers through review 109 justness of a regulation based on a labor law according to the limitation and function of Labor-management autonomy.
      번역하기

      According to the constitutional law, a labor law was established on the basis of particular labor standards laws and collective labor and management relations laws. The former deals with the lowest criterion and the latter is premised on the security ...

      According to the constitutional law, a labor law was established on the basis of particular labor standards laws and collective labor and management relations laws. The former deals with the lowest criterion and the latter is premised on the security of union rights of labor groups But there still has not been enough reviews theoretically on how the labor law can control particular contract-autonomy and collective labor-management autonomy, on what the basis of the law is, and on what limitation is. To solve these problems, it is needed to have a feeling of danger of flexibility and regulation-relaxation on a labor law and to bring a question on a legal foundation and limitation on intervention of a substantial law in the labor law
      Therefore, putting a emphasis on collective labor and management relations laws and private contract-autonomy and putting limitation on the act of a substantial law as a whole, this research is to investigate legal intervention by the substantial law and the relationship of management and unions autonomy On the other hand, we can find two different opinions on a basic standard. One is management and unions autonomy. The other one is a legal intervention by a state They depend on whether they are related to the laws in article 32, clause 2 and article 33, clause 1 of a constitution, and on how they define self-determination service relation and the actual condition of labor union in term of how a labor union works It organically and it deals with illegal labor acts. In conclusion, this study is to review decision system on labor condition comprehensively, clarifying a clear mutual relation from three points of view, a substantial law, a collective, and a private.
      The labor law has to contribute to the change of existing labor union's conditions and workers' awareness on their right. But every other problem caused separately should also be considered in a proper way. Accordingly, this study has a Significance of looking in contemporary opinions on systematic sentiments of protection device for workers through review 109 justness of a regulation based on a labor law according to the limitation and function of Labor-management autonomy.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 노동법에서 노사자치의 기능과 한계
      • Ⅲ. 노사자치에 관한 노동법적 규제의 정당성과 방법
      • Ⅳ. 개별적 계약자치와 집단적 노사자치의 관계
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 노동법에서 노사자치의 기능과 한계
      • Ⅲ. 노사자치에 관한 노동법적 규제의 정당성과 방법
      • Ⅳ. 개별적 계약자치와 집단적 노사자치의 관계
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2019-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.09 1.09 0.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.89 0.82 1.527 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼