Tricalcium Silicate-Based 치수복조재에 대한 수 종 수복재의 전단결합강도 비교 = Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Materials to Tricalcium Silicate-Based Pulp Capping Materials

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 Tricalcium silicate를 기반으로 한 3종의 치수복조재(Theracal LC™, Biodentine™, ProRoot™ white MTA)와 임상에서 통상적으로 사용되는 수복재인 복합레진, 레진강화형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트, 그리고 전통적인 글래스아이오노머 시멘트 간의전단결합강도를 비교 평가하는 것이다. 이를 위해 중심구를 가진 아크릴 레진 블록 90개를 제작하고 각각 30개씩 3종의 치수복조재로중심구 안에 채운 다음, 다시 무작위로 10개씩 하위 군을 나누어 치수복조재 상방에 복합레진, 레진강화형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트, 전통적인 글래스아이오노머 시멘트를 적용하여 총 9개 군으로 이루어진 시편을 제작하였다. Universal testing machine을 이용해 전단결합강도를 측정한 뒤, 입체현미경을 사용해 파절양상을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, Theracal LC™-복합레진 군이 가장 높은 전단결합강도를, Theracal LC™-전통적인 글래스아이오노머 시멘트 군이 가장 낮은 전단결합강도를 나타냈다. 복합레진이 수복재로 선택된 군들이다른 수복재 군에 비해 높은 전단결합강도를 보였다. 전통적인 글래스아이오노머 시멘트가 수복재인 경우 Biodentine™이 다른 치수복조재 군들에 비해 높은 전단결합강도를 나타냈다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of three typical restorative materials - glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) and composite resin (CR) - to different pulp capping materials, i.e., Theracal LC™ (TLC), Biodentine™ (BD), and ProRoot™ white MTA (WMTA).
90 acrylic blocks with a center hole were prepared. The holes were completely filled with three pulp capping materials (TLC, BD, and WMTA), with 30 specimens per capping material. The samples were then randomly divided into 3 subgroups of 10 specimens each and were overlaid with GIC, RMGIC, or CR. A total 9 specimen groups were prepared.
The SBS was assessed using a universal testing machine. Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney’s test were performed to compare the SBS among the subgroups (p < 0.05). After the SBS test, the fractured surfaces were examined under a stereomicroscope at a magnification of 25×.
The highest and lowest SBS values were recorded for TLC-CR and TLC-GIC, respectively. With regard to the SBS to the three pulp capping materials, CR was found to be superior to RMGIC and GIC. BD showed a higher SBS compared to TLC and WMTA when used with GIC.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 DeHoff PH, "Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test" 11 : 126-131, 1995

2 Kerby RE, "The relative shear bond strength of visible light-curing and chemically curing glass-ionomer cement to composite resin" 23 : 641-644, 1992

3 Hashem DF, "The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration" 30 : 343-349, 2014

4 이석련, "The effect of acid-etch procedure on the bond between composite resin and mineral trioxide aggregate" 대한치과재료학회 41 (41): 53-57, 2014

5 Bayrak S, "Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to white mineral trioxide aggregate" 28 : 62-67, 2009

6 Yesilyurt C, "Shear bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cements bound to mineral trioxide aggregate" 35 : 1381-1383, 2009

7 Kaup M, "Shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo" 19 : 11-14, 2015

8 Deepa VL, "Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to three different liners: TheraCal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement using universal adhesive: An in vitro study" 19 : 166-170, 2016

9 Nowicka A, "Response of human dental pulp capped with biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate" 39 : 743-747, 2013

10 Akhlaghi N, "Outcomes of vital pulp therapy in permanent teeth with different medicaments based on review of the literature" 12 : 406-417, 2015

11 Cengiz E, "Microshear bond strength of Tri-calcium silicate-based sements to different restorative materials" 18 : 231-237, 2016

12 Camilleri J, "Investigation of Biodentine as dentine replacement material" 41 : 600-610, 2013

13 윤은영, "Giomer와 자가 산부식 접착제의 상아질에 대한 전단 결합강도" 대한소아치과학회 37 (37): 422-428, 2010

14 Li J, "Flexure strength of resinmodified glass ionomer cements and their bond strength to dental composites" 54 : 55-58, 1996

15 Karadas M, "Evaluation of the bond strength of different adhesive agents to a resinmodified calcium silicate material (TheraCal LC)" 10 : 2015

16 Cantekin K, "Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®)" 22 : 302-306, 2014

17 Shin JH, "Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate surface treatments on morphology and bond strength to composite resin" 40 : 1210-1216, 2014

18 Kayahan MB, "Effect of acid-etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate" 42 : 1004-1014, 2009

19 Gulati S, "Comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer to conditioned and unconditioned mineral trioxide aggregate surface: An in vitro study" 17 : 440-443, 2014

20 Ajami AA, "Comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin to three pulp capping agents" 7 : 164-168, 2013

21 Raju VG, "Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study" 32 : 304-310, 2014

22 Eid AA, "Characterization of the mineral trioxide aggregate-resin modified glass ionomer cement interface in different setting conditions" 38 : 1126-1129, 2012

23 Cantekin K, "Bond strength of different restorative materials to light-curable mineral trioxide aggregate" 39 : 143-148, 2015

24 Ballal S, "An in vitro study to assess the setting and surface crazing of conventional glass ionomer cement when layered over partially set mineral trioxide aggregate" 34 : 478-480, 2008