RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      官僚制에서의 X-非能率性 = X-Inefficiency in Bureaucracy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2076641

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper, I applied to bureaucracy Leibenstein's X-efficiency theory of the firm. X-inefficiency is contrasted to allocative efficiency. Inputs may be allocated to the right units for use. However, there is no need to presume that the decision and performance entities involved must use inputs as effectively as possible.
      An individual in the organization has some discretions in his choice of APQT(Activities-Pace-Quality-Time) bundles (i.e. effort points), and so he can and umst interpret his job. If external or internal pressures decline, he gradually shifts his position in the direction of a reduction in the connectedness of effort points to firm objectives (effort entropy), resulting in increases in unit cost. X-inefficiency is designated as the difference between maximal effectiveness of the utilization of inputs and the actual efectiveness.
      I demonstrated various causes of X-inefficiency in bureaucracy, some of which are (1) contracts for labor are incomplete, (2) the production function is not completely specified or known, (3) not all inputs are marketed, or, if marketed, they are not available on equal terms to all buyers, and (4) managements' aspiration levels are different. Futhermore, the lack of external pressures, such as competitive pressure, can result in X-inefficiency in bureaucracy.
      To struggle against effort entropy and to avoid cost increase can we devise many methods such as (1) the introduction and strengthening of incentive system, (2) the change of management/leadership style, (3) the alteration of organization structure, (4) the introduction of control system. But more powerful and less costly method than these may be the introduction of competition into bureaucracy. As Leibenstein indicated, discretion in the choice of APQT bundles can be reduced by promoting competition between organizations. Competition reduces X-inefficiency and unit cost than monopoly does.
      Leibenstein's identification of X-efficiency forms one of the vital links between the economic analysis of organizations and the sociological and management (or administrative) analysis. The concept of X-efficiency represents a common meeting ground for economics and science of public administration.

      번역하기

      In this paper, I applied to bureaucracy Leibenstein's X-efficiency theory of the firm. X-inefficiency is contrasted to allocative efficiency. Inputs may be allocated to the right units for use. However, there is no need to presume that the decision an...

      In this paper, I applied to bureaucracy Leibenstein's X-efficiency theory of the firm. X-inefficiency is contrasted to allocative efficiency. Inputs may be allocated to the right units for use. However, there is no need to presume that the decision and performance entities involved must use inputs as effectively as possible.
      An individual in the organization has some discretions in his choice of APQT(Activities-Pace-Quality-Time) bundles (i.e. effort points), and so he can and umst interpret his job. If external or internal pressures decline, he gradually shifts his position in the direction of a reduction in the connectedness of effort points to firm objectives (effort entropy), resulting in increases in unit cost. X-inefficiency is designated as the difference between maximal effectiveness of the utilization of inputs and the actual efectiveness.
      I demonstrated various causes of X-inefficiency in bureaucracy, some of which are (1) contracts for labor are incomplete, (2) the production function is not completely specified or known, (3) not all inputs are marketed, or, if marketed, they are not available on equal terms to all buyers, and (4) managements' aspiration levels are different. Futhermore, the lack of external pressures, such as competitive pressure, can result in X-inefficiency in bureaucracy.
      To struggle against effort entropy and to avoid cost increase can we devise many methods such as (1) the introduction and strengthening of incentive system, (2) the change of management/leadership style, (3) the alteration of organization structure, (4) the introduction of control system. But more powerful and less costly method than these may be the introduction of competition into bureaucracy. As Leibenstein indicated, discretion in the choice of APQT bundles can be reduced by promoting competition between organizations. Competition reduces X-inefficiency and unit cost than monopoly does.
      Leibenstein's identification of X-efficiency forms one of the vital links between the economic analysis of organizations and the sociological and management (or administrative) analysis. The concept of X-efficiency represents a common meeting ground for economics and science of public administration.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. X-非能率의 槪念
      • Ⅲ. 官僚制 X-非能率의 要因
      • Ⅳ. X-能率 改善方案
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. X-非能率의 槪念
      • Ⅲ. 官僚制 X-非能率의 要因
      • Ⅳ. X-能率 改善方案
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼