RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Comparison on the efficacy of automated endoscope reprocessors : orthophthalaldehyde vs. PHMB/DBAC = 내시경 소독기기 및 내시경 소독제 효과 비교 : orthophthalaldehyde vs. PHMB/DBAC

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12519880

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: With the increase in the use of endoscopes for diagnostic and also for therapeutic purposes, the importance of reprocessing has become a top priority to minimize spread of infection through endoscopes. Endoscopes are classified as semicritical item and thus high-level disinfection is required. To standardize and improve the disinfection efficacy, automated endoscopes reprocessors (AERs) have been developed and are being widely used. Recently, a novel endoscope processor, COOLENDO (APEX Korea, Seoul, Korea) has been released on market in Korea. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of two ultrasonographic cleaning incorporated AERs (COOLENDO and OER-A).

      Materials and Methods: Endoscope reprocessing was first performed with 40 endoscopes as a pilot study in order to calculate the sample size. Based on the result of the pilot study, random sampling was done on 86 endoscopes. Samples were taken from the tip of insertion tube with swab wetted with normal saline and also after rinsing the working channel with 30mL of normal saline which was later filtered through a membrane filter of 0.22um in size and then incubated onto blood agar plate. The presence of any cultured organism, including H.pylori, was assessed.

      Results: The culture-positive rate at the tip of insertion tube and working channel was 0% and 2.33% for COOLENDO and 4.65% and 0% for OER-A. The reprocessing efficacy of COOLENDO was non-inferior to that of OER-A (p = 0.032, C.I. -0.042 to 0.042).

      Conclusions: The reprocessing efficacy of COOLENDO was non-inferior to that of OER-A.
      번역하기

      Background: With the increase in the use of endoscopes for diagnostic and also for therapeutic purposes, the importance of reprocessing has become a top priority to minimize spread of infection through endoscopes. Endoscopes are classified as semicrit...

      Background: With the increase in the use of endoscopes for diagnostic and also for therapeutic purposes, the importance of reprocessing has become a top priority to minimize spread of infection through endoscopes. Endoscopes are classified as semicritical item and thus high-level disinfection is required. To standardize and improve the disinfection efficacy, automated endoscopes reprocessors (AERs) have been developed and are being widely used. Recently, a novel endoscope processor, COOLENDO (APEX Korea, Seoul, Korea) has been released on market in Korea. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of two ultrasonographic cleaning incorporated AERs (COOLENDO and OER-A).

      Materials and Methods: Endoscope reprocessing was first performed with 40 endoscopes as a pilot study in order to calculate the sample size. Based on the result of the pilot study, random sampling was done on 86 endoscopes. Samples were taken from the tip of insertion tube with swab wetted with normal saline and also after rinsing the working channel with 30mL of normal saline which was later filtered through a membrane filter of 0.22um in size and then incubated onto blood agar plate. The presence of any cultured organism, including H.pylori, was assessed.

      Results: The culture-positive rate at the tip of insertion tube and working channel was 0% and 2.33% for COOLENDO and 4.65% and 0% for OER-A. The reprocessing efficacy of COOLENDO was non-inferior to that of OER-A (p = 0.032, C.I. -0.042 to 0.042).

      Conclusions: The reprocessing efficacy of COOLENDO was non-inferior to that of OER-A.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract ………………………………………………ii
      • I. Introduction ……………………………………… 1
      • II. Materials and Methods ………………...........4
      • III. Results ……………………………………………9
      • IV. Discussion ………………………………………11
      • Abstract ………………………………………………ii
      • I. Introduction ……………………………………… 1
      • II. Materials and Methods ………………...........4
      • III. Results ……………………………………………9
      • IV. Discussion ………………………………………11
      • VI. References ...…………………………………. 27
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼