RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      초등 교사의 과학 관련 사회적 쟁점에 대한 윤리적 민감성 = Elementary School Teachers` Ethical Sensitivity on Socio-scientific Issues

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102412855

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      As curriculum statements require addressing ethical and social issues which are raised by modern science and technology, the ability to perceive ethical and social issues regarding science is necessary for teachers to introduce socio-scientific issues...

      As curriculum statements require addressing ethical and social issues which are raised by modern science and technology, the ability to perceive ethical and social issues regarding science is necessary for teachers to introduce socio-scientific issues (SSI) in their science class. The purpose of this study is to explore elementary school teachers` ethical sensitivity on SSI and attempts to give implications for teacher education. To explore the ethical sensitivity in the context of SSI, the revised version of the Test for Ethical Sensitivity on Science (TESS) was used. Two socio-scientific issues (genetic engineering and radioactive waste) were provided to read and write down five possible questions they believed should be considered before reaching a decision. Data was collected from eighty-two elementary school teachers in Korea. To analyze the ethical sensitivity, the responses including ethical considerations were analyzed by situation and ethical issues. The result showed that 81 out of 82 teacher participants provided at least more than one ethical consideration on each scenario of this study. However, not many teacher could raise various ethical issues and situation that ethical issue might occur. There were only a few teaches who could consider all the situations, `process of scientific research`, `application of science and technology`, and `science influenced by society`, that ethical issues might occur. Especially, teachers failed to consider that the ethical issue can occur in the situation when science is influenced by society. Based on the results, we suggest that during teacher education teachers need to experience finding various ethical issues that can occur in the context of SSI and especially considering the ethical issues when science is influenced by society.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최영미, "중학생들의 도덕적 감수성과 과학 선호도 및 과학학습에 대한 신념과의 상관관계" 한국과학교육학회 35 (35): 65-72, 2015

      2 도경애, "과학과 관련된 사회윤리적 문제에 대한 중학생들의 도덕적 감수성 조사" 한국물리학회 64 (64): 170-179, 2014

      3 Means, M. L, "Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels" 14 (14): 139-178, 1996

      4 Herkert, J. R, "Ways of thinking about teaching ethical problem solving: microethics and macroethics in engineering" 11 : 373-385, 2005

      5 Bell, R. L, "Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues" 87 (87): 352-377, 2003

      6 Hodson, D, "Time for action: science education for an alternative future" 25 (25): 645-670, 2003

      7 Cho, H, "Theories and methods of science ethics education" Jipmoondang 2008

      8 Reiss, M, "The use of ethical frameworks by students following a new science course for 16-18" 17 (17): 889-902, 2008

      9 Zeidler, D. L, "The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education" Kluwer Academic Pub 7-38, 2003

      10 McComas, W. F, "The nature of science in science education, rationales and strategies" Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

      1 최영미, "중학생들의 도덕적 감수성과 과학 선호도 및 과학학습에 대한 신념과의 상관관계" 한국과학교육학회 35 (35): 65-72, 2015

      2 도경애, "과학과 관련된 사회윤리적 문제에 대한 중학생들의 도덕적 감수성 조사" 한국물리학회 64 (64): 170-179, 2014

      3 Means, M. L, "Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels" 14 (14): 139-178, 1996

      4 Herkert, J. R, "Ways of thinking about teaching ethical problem solving: microethics and macroethics in engineering" 11 : 373-385, 2005

      5 Bell, R. L, "Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues" 87 (87): 352-377, 2003

      6 Hodson, D, "Time for action: science education for an alternative future" 25 (25): 645-670, 2003

      7 Cho, H, "Theories and methods of science ethics education" Jipmoondang 2008

      8 Reiss, M, "The use of ethical frameworks by students following a new science course for 16-18" 17 (17): 889-902, 2008

      9 Zeidler, D. L, "The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education" Kluwer Academic Pub 7-38, 2003

      10 McComas, W. F, "The nature of science in science education, rationales and strategies" Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

      11 Resnik, D. B, "The ethics of science: An introduction" Routledge 1998

      12 Fullick, P, "Teaching ethical aspects of science" Bassett Press 1996

      13 Barrett, S. E, "Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates’ belief" 47 (47): 380-401, 2010

      14 Korean Educational Development Institute (KEDI), "Statistical yearbook of education" Korean Educational Development Institute 2012

      15 Bingle, W. H, "Scientific literacy for decisionmaking and the social construction of scientific knowledge" 78 (78): 185-201, 1994

      16 Kolstø, S. D, "Scientific literacy for citizenship : Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues" 85 (85): 291-310, 2001

      17 Kolstø, S. D, "Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues" 90 (90): 632-655, 2006

      18 Ratcliffe, M, "Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues" Open University Press 2003

      19 Beauchamp, T. L, "Principles of biomedical ethics" Oxford University Press 2001

      20 Khishfe, R, "Nature of science and decision-making" 34 (34): 67-100, 2012

      21 National Research Council (NRC), "National science education standards" National Academic Press 1996

      22 Fowler, S, "Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students" 31 (31): 279-296, 2009

      23 Sadler, T. D, "Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues" 33 (33): 339-358, 2004

      24 Rest, J. R, "Moral development: Advances in research and theory" Praeger 1986

      25 Sadler, T. D, "Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research" 41 (41): 513-536, 2004

      26 Tytler, R, "Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education" 23 (23): 815-832, 2001

      27 Lee, H, "Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues" 34 (34): 925-953, 2012

      28 Zeidler, D. L, "Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education" 89 (89): 357-377, 2005

      29 Millar, R, "Beyond 2000 : Science education for the future" King’s College School of Education 1998

      30 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), "Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report"

      31 Fleming, R, "Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues. Part Ⅰ: Social cognition" 23 (23): 677-687, 1986

      32 Fleming, R, "Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues. Part II: Nonsocial cognition" 23 (23): 689-698, 1986

      33 Clarkeburn, H, "A test for ethical sensitivity in science" 31 (31): 439-453, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.21 1.21 1.35
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.34 1.28 1.783 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼