The reason Seoul-gut has existed as yet is men and women have respected for each other. In circumstance that Shaman never will be a musician, and musician can’t be a shaman, the way of survival is mutual cooperation . Although a male- dominated i...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76251389
2005
Korean
학술저널
75-99(25쪽)
2
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The reason Seoul-gut has existed as yet is men and women have respected for each other. In circumstance that Shaman never will be a musician, and musician can’t be a shaman, the way of survival is mutual cooperation . Although a male- dominated i...
The reason Seoul-gut has existed as yet is men and women have respected for each other. In circumstance that Shaman never will be a musician, and musician can’t be a shaman, the way of survival is mutual cooperation .
Although a male- dominated idea was spreaded, it was gut-society that woman was treated by their ability. And man took a regular role as a musician. In seoul-gut, every person was treated equally, they did the best that was in them. Musician could also be a faithful critic. Shaman couldn’t evaluate themselves because, they only took part in their guts. But musician had an ability to evaluate shamans through participating in other guts. After gut was over, therefore, musician could tell their feeling, in fact, they could point out shaman’s weak point.
It was natural that shaman asked musician rhythm or a question of gut.
If shaman might be a poor at song or zang-go , musician covered her with his music sound. We can find scenes like this now. While shaman were willing to send the musician away to another gut, and pay for it. In seoul gut, there were harmony and coexistence between Shaman and musician. However, there are only cooperation, not communication now.
It becomes more and more commercial they consider each other as a professional men and women, not harmony of them.
목차 (Table of Contents)
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2019-04-30 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Society of Practice Folkloristics | ![]() |
| 2019-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2016-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2015-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보로 하락 (기타) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.7 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.73 | 0.77 | 1.336 | 0.25 |