RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      언어재활사 컴퓨터 기반 국가시험에 대한 인식과 만족도 조사 = Speech-Language Pathologists’ Perceptions and Satisfaction towards Computer-Based National Examination

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108916590

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives: This study aimed to investigate speech-language pathologists’ perceptions and satisfaction with the computer-based examination after conducting a computer-based examination including a new question type developed in advance of the CBT for speech-language pathologists to lay the foundation for efficient operation of the national examination for speech-language pathologists. Methods: A total of 98 participants (11 males, 87 females) who had taken and passed the national examination for speech-language pathologists within the last 3 years participated in the current examination, and 75 (10 males and 65 females) applicants completed the survey following the examination. Results: Regarding the need to introduce CBT in the national examination for speech-language pathologists, the most common perception was ‘necessary’ (58.7%), and the most common perception was ‘not more time-consuming’ (46.7%) for the computer test compared to the paper test. Satisfaction with the CBT was most likely to be ‘satisfied’ (49.3%), and the convenience of the CBT was equally split between ‘convenient’ (41.3%) and ‘not convenient’ (41.3%) compared to the paper test. Comprehensive assessment of the applicant’s problem-solving skills by simulating realistic clinical situations (73.3%) was perceived as the biggest advantage of the CBT. On the other hand, inconvenience in calculations (62.7%) was perceived as the main disadvantage. Conclusion: Speech-language pathologists perceived the transition to CBT positively and were satisfied with the testing method. However, discomfort in operating the computer and unfamiliarity with the test method were still perceived as difficulties in the CBT. Overall, it is necessary to provide guidance on the test method and ensure technical stability so that the CBT for speech-language pathologists can be systematically implemented.
      번역하기

      Objectives: This study aimed to investigate speech-language pathologists’ perceptions and satisfaction with the computer-based examination after conducting a computer-based examination including a new question type developed in advance of the CBT fo...

      Objectives: This study aimed to investigate speech-language pathologists’ perceptions and satisfaction with the computer-based examination after conducting a computer-based examination including a new question type developed in advance of the CBT for speech-language pathologists to lay the foundation for efficient operation of the national examination for speech-language pathologists. Methods: A total of 98 participants (11 males, 87 females) who had taken and passed the national examination for speech-language pathologists within the last 3 years participated in the current examination, and 75 (10 males and 65 females) applicants completed the survey following the examination. Results: Regarding the need to introduce CBT in the national examination for speech-language pathologists, the most common perception was ‘necessary’ (58.7%), and the most common perception was ‘not more time-consuming’ (46.7%) for the computer test compared to the paper test. Satisfaction with the CBT was most likely to be ‘satisfied’ (49.3%), and the convenience of the CBT was equally split between ‘convenient’ (41.3%) and ‘not convenient’ (41.3%) compared to the paper test. Comprehensive assessment of the applicant’s problem-solving skills by simulating realistic clinical situations (73.3%) was perceived as the biggest advantage of the CBT. On the other hand, inconvenience in calculations (62.7%) was perceived as the main disadvantage. Conclusion: Speech-language pathologists perceived the transition to CBT positively and were satisfied with the testing method. However, discomfort in operating the computer and unfamiliarity with the test method were still perceived as difficulties in the CBT. Overall, it is necessary to provide guidance on the test method and ensure technical stability so that the CBT for speech-language pathologists can be systematically implemented.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼