RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Watch One, Do One? A Systematic Review and Educational Analysis of YouTube Microsurgery Videos, and a Proposal for a Quality Assurance Checklist

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108266646

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background Educational resourceson the internet are extensively used to obtainmedical information. YouTube is the most accessed video platform containing information to enhance the learning experience of medical professionals. This study systematicall...

      Background Educational resourceson the internet are extensively used to obtainmedical information. YouTube is the most accessed video platform containing information to enhance the learning experience of medical professionals. This study systematically analyzed the educational value of microsurgery-related videos on this platform.
      Methods A systematic review was conducted on YouTube from April 18 to May 18, 2020, using the following terms: “microsurgery,” “microsurgical,” “microsurgical anastomosis,” “free flap,” and “free tissue transfer.” The search was limited to the first 100 videos, and two independent reviewers screened for eligible entries and analyzed their educational value using validated scales, including a modified version of the DISCERN score (M-DISCERN), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMAS) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS). Evaluation of video popularity was also assessed with the video power index (VPI).
      Results Of 356 retrieved videos, 75 (21%) were considered eligible. The educational quality of videos was highly variable, and the mean global scores for the M-DISCERN, JAMAS, and GQS for our sample were consistent with medium to low quality.
      Conclusions A limited number of videos on YouTube for microsurgical education have higheducational quality. The majority scored low on the utilized criteria. Peer-reviewed resources seem to be a more reliable resource. Although the potential of YouTube should not be disregarded, videos shouldbe carefully appraisedbeforebeing used as an educational resource.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Jayakumar N, "e-Learning in surgical education : a systematic review" 72 (72): 1145-1157, 2015

      2 RappAK, "YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation" 73 (73): 1072-1076, 2016

      3 Rodriguez HA, "Viewer discretion advised : is YouTube a friend or foe in surgical education?" 32 (32): 1724-1728, 2018

      4 Mota P, "Video-based surgical learning : improving trainee education and preparation for surgery" 75 (75): 828-835, 2018

      5 "Ulnar fasciocutaneous free flap"

      6 Selber JC, "Tracking the learning curve in microsurgical skill acquisition" 130 (130): 550e-557e, 2012

      7 Ward M, "The educational quality of neurosurgical resources on YouTube" 130 : e660-e665, 2019

      8 "Radial forearm flap"

      9 "Press - YouTube"

      10 SadideenH, "Practical skills teaching in contemporary surgical education : how can educational theory be applied to promote effective learning?" 204 (204): 396-401, 2012

      1 Jayakumar N, "e-Learning in surgical education : a systematic review" 72 (72): 1145-1157, 2015

      2 RappAK, "YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation" 73 (73): 1072-1076, 2016

      3 Rodriguez HA, "Viewer discretion advised : is YouTube a friend or foe in surgical education?" 32 (32): 1724-1728, 2018

      4 Mota P, "Video-based surgical learning : improving trainee education and preparation for surgery" 75 (75): 828-835, 2018

      5 "Ulnar fasciocutaneous free flap"

      6 Selber JC, "Tracking the learning curve in microsurgical skill acquisition" 130 (130): 550e-557e, 2012

      7 Ward M, "The educational quality of neurosurgical resources on YouTube" 130 : e660-e665, 2019

      8 "Radial forearm flap"

      9 "Press - YouTube"

      10 SadideenH, "Practical skills teaching in contemporary surgical education : how can educational theory be applied to promote effective learning?" 204 (204): 396-401, 2012

      11 Almarghoub MA, "Plastic surgery on YouTube" 8 (8): e2586-, 2020

      12 Azer SA, "Nervous system examination on YouTube" 12 (12): 126-, 2012

      13 "Microsurgical technique for 1mm vessel end to end anastomosis by Yelena Akelina DVM"

      14 "Microsurgical repair of the rat sciatic nerve"

      15 Valsamis EM, "Learning curves in surgery : variables, analysis and applications" 94 (94): 525-530, 2018

      16 "Latissimus dorsi free flap"

      17 "Introduction to microsurgery part 1"

      18 "Improving microvascular anastomosis efficiency by combining open-loop and airborne suture techniques"

      19 "Fibular free flap"

      20 Ferhatoglu MF, "Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in sleeve gastrectomy videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube" 29 (29): 1477-1484, 2019

      21 Erdem MN, "Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube" 43 (43): E1334-E1339, 2018

      22 "Elevation of thin anterolateral thigh flap on superficial fascia plane by Jp (Joon Pio) Hong"

      23 Covington P, "Deep Neural Networks for YouTube Recommendations"

      24 Charnock D, "DISCERN : an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices" 53 (53): 105-111, 1999

      25 "Chang’s technique of sequential end-to-side microvascular anastomosis"

      26 Berner JE, "Bases teóricas del uso simulación para el entrenamiento en cirugía" 70 (70): 2018

      27 Silberg WM, "Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet : Caveant lector et viewor–Let the reader and viewer beware" 277 (277): 1244-1245, 1997

      28 Derakhshan A, "Assessing the educational quality of ‘YouTube’ videos for facelifts" 40 (40): 156-159, 2019

      29 Bernard A, "A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web" 102 (102): 2070-2077, 2007

      30 Schneider LF, "A nationwide curriculum analysis of integrated plastic surgery training : is training standardized?" 132 (132): 1054e-1062e, 2013

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한성형외과 학회지 -> Archives of Plastic Surgery
      외국어명 : Journal of The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons -> Archives of Plastic Surgery
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.11 0.335 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼