RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Comparative Study of Asian and European Countries- Nation Brand Perception-Reality Gap -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109473887

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Nation brand models that use only perception surveys are widely utilized; however, due to the diversity and complexity of human perception mechanisms, they may fail to objectively reflect the actual nation brand. This phenomenon, known as the Perception-Reality Gap (PRG), can hinder the development of nation branding strategies, especially when the perception of a specific nation brand greatly differs from the country's actual situation. Despite the significance of quantitative and regional studies on PRG, such research remains insufficient. To fill this research gap, this study measures PRG using the perception-based NBI model, and the SNBI model, which uses the same six dimensions and weights as the NBI, making one-to-one comparison easier. It applies theories of social psychology and cognitive bias to nation brand evaluation and proposes three hypotheses regarding the differences between people's perception and statistical reality in nation branding. To test these hypotheses, the study first conducts a cross-sectional analysis of PRG differences across 37 countries. Second, it divides the surveyed countries into three regions and classifies them into five groups based on the size of PRG differences for further analysis. Finally, it performs a longitudinal comparison analysis of PRG differences across the three regions. Additionally, based on cross-sectional and temporal evaluations of South Korea, the study provides tailored strategic directions for future public diplomacy efforts. Findings suggest that the root causes of PRG gaps include cognitive biases, social psychology, and the effectiveness of public diplomacy efforts. To explore these causes in greater depth, we propose three research directions. This research is academically significant as it is the first to propose a method for comparing nation brand gaps regionally. Practically, it offers guidance on developing balanced nation branding strategies that consider both perceptions and reality.
      번역하기

      Nation brand models that use only perception surveys are widely utilized; however, due to the diversity and complexity of human perception mechanisms, they may fail to objectively reflect the actual nation brand. This phenomenon, known as the Percepti...

      Nation brand models that use only perception surveys are widely utilized; however, due to the diversity and complexity of human perception mechanisms, they may fail to objectively reflect the actual nation brand. This phenomenon, known as the Perception-Reality Gap (PRG), can hinder the development of nation branding strategies, especially when the perception of a specific nation brand greatly differs from the country's actual situation. Despite the significance of quantitative and regional studies on PRG, such research remains insufficient. To fill this research gap, this study measures PRG using the perception-based NBI model, and the SNBI model, which uses the same six dimensions and weights as the NBI, making one-to-one comparison easier. It applies theories of social psychology and cognitive bias to nation brand evaluation and proposes three hypotheses regarding the differences between people's perception and statistical reality in nation branding. To test these hypotheses, the study first conducts a cross-sectional analysis of PRG differences across 37 countries. Second, it divides the surveyed countries into three regions and classifies them into five groups based on the size of PRG differences for further analysis. Finally, it performs a longitudinal comparison analysis of PRG differences across the three regions. Additionally, based on cross-sectional and temporal evaluations of South Korea, the study provides tailored strategic directions for future public diplomacy efforts. Findings suggest that the root causes of PRG gaps include cognitive biases, social psychology, and the effectiveness of public diplomacy efforts. To explore these causes in greater depth, we propose three research directions. This research is academically significant as it is the first to propose a method for comparing nation brand gaps regionally. Practically, it offers guidance on developing balanced nation branding strategies that consider both perceptions and reality.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼