RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Impact of Doctors’ Resistance on Success of Drug Utilization Review System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101593917

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives: The drug utilization review (DUR) system, which checks any conflict event of medications, contributes to improve patient safety. One of the important barriers in its adoption is doctors’ resistance. This study aimed to analyze the impact...

      Objectives: The drug utilization review (DUR) system, which checks any conflict event of medications, contributes to improve patient safety. One of the important barriers in its adoption is doctors’ resistance. This study aimed to analyze the impacts of doctors’ resistance on the success of the DUR system. Methods: This study adopted an augmented the DeLone and McLean Information System (D&M IS) Success Model (2003), which used doctors’ resistance as a socio-technological measure. This study framework is the same as that of the D&M IS Success Model in that it is based on qualities, such as system, information, and services. The major difference is that this study excluded the variable ‘use’ because it was not statistically significant for mandatory systems. A survey of doctors who used computers to enter prescriptions was conducted at a Korean tertiary hospital in February 2012. Results: This study is very meaningful in that it is the first study to explore the success factors of the DUR system associated with doctors’ resistance. Doctors’ resistance to the DUR system was not statistically associated with user usefulness, whereas it affected user satisfaction. Conclusions: The results indicate that doctors still complain of discomfort in using the DUR system in the outpatient clinical setting, even though they admit that it contributes to patient safety. To mitigate doctors’ resistance and raise user satisfaction, more opinions from doctors regarding the DUR system have to be considered and have to be reflected in the system.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 채영문, "병원정보시스템의 주요성공요인" 대한의료정보학회 11 (11): 323-336, 2005

      2 Golob JF Jr, "Validation of Surgical Intensive Care-Infection Registry: a medical informatics system for intensive care unit research, quality of care improvement, and daily patient care" 207 (207): 164-173, 2008

      3 Kohn LT, "To err is human: building a safer health system" National Academy Press 2000

      4 Ventura ML, "The electronic medical record : pros and cons" 24 (24): 163-166, 2011

      5 Erwin WG, "The definition of drug utilization review: statement of issues" 50 (50): 596-599, 1991

      6 DeLone WH, "The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update" 19 (19): 9-30, 2003

      7 Park JY, "Status and evaluation of pilot study of drug utilization review" 5 (5): 18-29, 2010

      8 Yi GH, "Social science research methods" Bobmunsa 2008

      9 Murff HJ, "Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems" 8 (8): 499-509, 2001

      10 Jen WY, "Measuring mobile patient safety information system success: an empirical study" 77 (77): 689-697, 2008

      1 채영문, "병원정보시스템의 주요성공요인" 대한의료정보학회 11 (11): 323-336, 2005

      2 Golob JF Jr, "Validation of Surgical Intensive Care-Infection Registry: a medical informatics system for intensive care unit research, quality of care improvement, and daily patient care" 207 (207): 164-173, 2008

      3 Kohn LT, "To err is human: building a safer health system" National Academy Press 2000

      4 Ventura ML, "The electronic medical record : pros and cons" 24 (24): 163-166, 2011

      5 Erwin WG, "The definition of drug utilization review: statement of issues" 50 (50): 596-599, 1991

      6 DeLone WH, "The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update" 19 (19): 9-30, 2003

      7 Park JY, "Status and evaluation of pilot study of drug utilization review" 5 (5): 18-29, 2010

      8 Yi GH, "Social science research methods" Bobmunsa 2008

      9 Murff HJ, "Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems" 8 (8): 499-509, 2001

      10 Jen WY, "Measuring mobile patient safety information system success: an empirical study" 77 (77): 689-697, 2008

      11 Carroll C, "Involving users in the design and usability evaluation of a clinical decision support system" 69 (69): 123-135, 2002

      12 Bates DW, "Improving safety with information technology" 348 (348): 2526-2534, 2003

      13 Lee F, "Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns" 3 (3): 42-55, 1996

      14 Staggers N, "History and trends in clinical information systems in the United States" 33 (33): 75-81, 2001

      15 Aarts J, "Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care" 76 (76): S4-S13, 2007

      16 Booth RG, "Examining the functionality of the DeLone and McLean information system success model as a framework for synthesis in nursing information and communication technology research" 30 (30): 330-345, 2012

      17 Ammenwerth E, "Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges" 71 (71): 125-135, 2003

      18 Petter S, "Evaluating the success of an emergency response medical information system" 80 (80): 480-489, 2011

      19 Sittig DF, "Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system" 1999 : 400-404, 1999

      20 Seddon PB, "Dimensions of information systems success" 2 : 2-39, 1999

      21 Van Der Meijden MJ, "Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review" 10 (10): 235-243, 2003

      22 Choi JS, "Design and implementation of concurrent drug utilization review system in a general hospital" 7 (7): 1533-1538, 2013

      23 Berger RG, "Computerized physician order entry: helpful or harmful?" 11 (11): 100-103, 2004

      24 Yu P, "A multi-method approach to evaluate health information systems" 160 (160): 1231-1235, 2010

      25 Sedera D, "A factor and structural equation analysis of the enterprise systems success measurement model" 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-04-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한의료정보학회지 -> Healthcare Informatics Research
      외국어명 : Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics -> Healthcare Informatics Research
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.24 0.24 0.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.18 0.15 0.434 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼