국산훈련기 신뢰성기반 정비주기 연장방안 연구 = A Study for Maintenance Period Extensionbased on Reliability of Korea Trainer

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Currently, there are two types of trainer in Korea : basic and advanced. Both models have been in operation for more than 10 years, and compared to the early stage of operation, reliability has gradually improved and failure rates have also entered a trend of stabilization. Therefore, it is necessary to extend the maintenance period considering economic feasibility. This study investigates the three maintenance period calculation methods: NAVAIR 00-25-403 [17], DOD, U.S. [4], CERL and US Army [3], with intention to extend the maintenance period of the trainer from current 200 hours to 400 hours. In addition, the maintenance period was calculated by the three methods with actual operational data. Common standards and procedures were established to apply operational data to the existing maintenance period calculation methods, the required reliability indicators were derived, and the maintenance periods was calculated based on the results, additionally, a review on the field applicability of the three maintenance cycles was conducted. An on-site interviews were conducted with the calculation results, and 11 out of the 15 items were expected to be extended by 400 hours. It was suggested that the remaining 4 items could be extended to 400 hours by supplementing the inspection method through additional analysis such as functional analysis, inspection content verification, and site connection.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서 론 2. 이론적 배경 3. 정비주기 연장방안 검토 4. 결 론 References

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조인탁, "항공전자장비의 운용자료 분석을 통한 신뢰성 성장 연구" 한국산업경영시스템학회 36 (36): 100-108, 2013

2 전태보, "항공기 유형을 고려한 최적 예비엔진 및 모듈 소요 산출" 한국시뮬레이션학회 26 (26): 35-46, 2017

3 손영탁, "한국형 무인운전 고무차륜 AGT 시스템의 유지보수를 위한 신뢰성 기반의 고장 예방정비 시스템 개발에 관한 연구" 한국정밀공학회 27 (27): 36-47, 2010

4 김근원, "위험도평가 기반의 항공기 구조물 RCM 적용 방안 연구" 한국항공경영학회 11 (11): 61-74, 2013

5 한영희, "국방획득정책과 T-50 고등훈련기 연구개발의 성공사례" 한국혁신학회 7 (7): 115-135, 2012

6 CERL, "Technical Report-Reliability Centered Maintenance(RCM) Guide"

7 Moubray, J., "Reliability-centered maintenance" Industrial Press Inc. 2001

8 NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND, "Reliability-Centerted Maintenance(RCM) Handbook, S9081-AB-GIB010"

9 Nakagawa, T., "Random maintenance policies" Springer 2014

10 Smith, A.M., "RCM-Gateway to world class maintenance" Elsevier 2003

11 "NAVAIR 00-25-403, Guidelines for the Naval Aviation Reliability Centered Maintenance Process"

12 Mann, N. R., "Methods for statistical analysis of reliability and life data" Wiley 1974

13 Barlow, R., "Mathematical theory of reliability" Society for Industrial and Applied Mathe- matics 1996

14 Nakagawa, T., "Maintenance theory of reliability" Sprin- ger Science & Business Media 2006

15 "MIL-STD-1843, Reliability-centered maintenance for air- craft, engines and equipment"

16 "MIL-HDBK-338B, Electronic Reliability Design Hand- book"

17 "MIL-HDBK-217F Notice 2, Military Handbook, Reli- ability Prediction of Electronic Equipment"

18 "JA1012, S.A.E., A Guide to the Reliability-Centered Maintenance(RCM) Standard"

19 Ryu, D., "Improving reliability and quality for product success" Crc Press 2012

20 DOD, U.S., "DoD guide for achieving Reliability, Avail- ability"

21 Song, K.-T., "Application of Reliability based Inspection for an Effective RCM Approach of Railway System" 1294-1300, 2008

22 "AFMCI 21-103, Reliability-Centered Maintenance(RCM)Programs"