RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      디지털 저장매체의 압수·수색과 그 쟁점 = Search and Seizure of Digital Storage Devices and Related Arguments

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102082374

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper is a commentary on the ruling of the trial court in so-called ``Wangjaesan`` Case which became recently one of the most controversial issues regarding the National Security Law case. Most problematic was the viewpoint of the court about search and seizure of digital storage devices, since the court stood totally opposed to the principle thereon set out and published by the Supreme Court of Korea. The former part of this article is thus alloted to analyzing the opinion revealed by the trial court concerning search and seizure of digital storage devices, by comparing it with the principle declared by the Supreme Court. Through this I tried to verify that the attitude and judgment of the trial court in the ``Wangjaesan`` Case are obviously a deviation as well as a fallacy. In the latter part of this article, then, I studied the controversies related to digital evidence in detail. At the very core of the controversies was the issue ``object(s) of search and seizure``, which has continued to be the most difficult problem in theory. Another big issue is ``manner of search and seizure``, which used to be one of the biggest difficulties in practice. In this article, I tried to construct a new theory based on the arguments in the USA that served as a historical momentum to change the paradigm of traditional theory focused on tangible objects. That can be called the transformation of view from the ``analogue mind`` to the ``digital mind``.
      번역하기

      This paper is a commentary on the ruling of the trial court in so-called ``Wangjaesan`` Case which became recently one of the most controversial issues regarding the National Security Law case. Most problematic was the viewpoint of the court about sea...

      This paper is a commentary on the ruling of the trial court in so-called ``Wangjaesan`` Case which became recently one of the most controversial issues regarding the National Security Law case. Most problematic was the viewpoint of the court about search and seizure of digital storage devices, since the court stood totally opposed to the principle thereon set out and published by the Supreme Court of Korea. The former part of this article is thus alloted to analyzing the opinion revealed by the trial court concerning search and seizure of digital storage devices, by comparing it with the principle declared by the Supreme Court. Through this I tried to verify that the attitude and judgment of the trial court in the ``Wangjaesan`` Case are obviously a deviation as well as a fallacy. In the latter part of this article, then, I studied the controversies related to digital evidence in detail. At the very core of the controversies was the issue ``object(s) of search and seizure``, which has continued to be the most difficult problem in theory. Another big issue is ``manner of search and seizure``, which used to be one of the biggest difficulties in practice. In this article, I tried to construct a new theory based on the arguments in the USA that served as a historical momentum to change the paradigm of traditional theory focused on tangible objects. That can be called the transformation of view from the ``analogue mind`` to the ``digital mind``.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조국, "컴퓨터 전자기록에 대한 대물적 강제처분의 해석론적 쟁점" 한국형사정책학회 22 (22): 99-123, 2010

      2 탁희성, "전자증거의 압수·수색에 관한 일고찰" 한국형사정책연구원 15 (15): 21-62, 2004

      3 박수희, "전자증거의 수집과 강제수사" 한국공안행정학회 16 (16): 125-154, 2007

      4 곽윤직, "물권법" 박영사 1994

      5 전명길, "디지털증거의 수집과 증거능력" 한국법학회 (41) : 317-336, 2011

      6 강동욱, "디지털증거 수집에 관한 형사소송법 개정안에 대한 검토" 법학연구소 18 (18): 161-188, 2010

      7 권양섭, "디지털 포렌식 법률체계 구축 방안" 한국법학회 (35) : 357-382, 2009

      8 오길영, "디지털 검증의 현재와 그 부당성 — 소위 ‘왕재산’ 사건을 대상으로 —" 민주주의법학연구회 (48) : 159-195, 2012

      9 Josh Goldfoot, "The Physical Computer and The Fourth Amendment" 16 : 112-167, 2011

      10 Orin S. Kerr, "Searches and Seizures in a Digital World" 119 : 531-585, 2005

      1 조국, "컴퓨터 전자기록에 대한 대물적 강제처분의 해석론적 쟁점" 한국형사정책학회 22 (22): 99-123, 2010

      2 탁희성, "전자증거의 압수·수색에 관한 일고찰" 한국형사정책연구원 15 (15): 21-62, 2004

      3 박수희, "전자증거의 수집과 강제수사" 한국공안행정학회 16 (16): 125-154, 2007

      4 곽윤직, "물권법" 박영사 1994

      5 전명길, "디지털증거의 수집과 증거능력" 한국법학회 (41) : 317-336, 2011

      6 강동욱, "디지털증거 수집에 관한 형사소송법 개정안에 대한 검토" 법학연구소 18 (18): 161-188, 2010

      7 권양섭, "디지털 포렌식 법률체계 구축 방안" 한국법학회 (35) : 357-382, 2009

      8 오길영, "디지털 검증의 현재와 그 부당성 — 소위 ‘왕재산’ 사건을 대상으로 —" 민주주의법학연구회 (48) : 159-195, 2012

      9 Josh Goldfoot, "The Physical Computer and The Fourth Amendment" 16 : 112-167, 2011

      10 Orin S. Kerr, "Searches and Seizures in a Digital World" 119 : 531-585, 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.1 1.1 0.97
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.86 0.85 1.186 0.82
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼