RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      비인격적 감독의 선행요인 고찰: 상사의 업무 과부하, Type A 성격, 번아웃이 비인격적 감독에 미치는 영향 = Antecedents of Abusive Supervision: The Effects of Supervisors’ Work Overload, Type A Personality, and Burnout on Abusive Supervision

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106228358

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In today’s organizations, leadership is one of the most important factors of organi- zational effectiveness. However, many employees are suffering from the dark side of leadership exercised by their supervisors, which causes a great deal of negative effects and damage not only to employees but also to their organizations. Therefore, to suggest managerial solutions to the dark side of leadership, it is essential to examine potential personal and environmental factors affecting such leadership. Thus, in this study, we focused on ‘abusive supervision’(Tepper, 2000) as the dark side of leadership and explored the personal and environmental antecedents of abusive supervision. Abusive supervision is defined as employees’perceptions of the extent to which supervisors engage in the sustained display of hostile verbal and nonverbal behaviors, excluding physical contact(Tepper, 2000).
      We identified supervisors’ work overload and Type A personality as environmental and personal antecedents of abusive supervision, respectively. Work overload pertains to having many responsibilities and job demands in limited time. Type A personality is a personality trait that is highly sensitive to time pressure and achievement. Prior research on the antecedents of abusive supervision has examined environmental and personal factors separately. Complementing this line of research, we examined moderation and moderated-mediation effects of Type A personality by drawing on conservation of resources theory, frustration-aggression model, affective events theory, and ego depletion theory. More specifically, we proposed the mediating effect of supervisors’burnout on the relationship between work overload and abusive supervision and the interaction effect of supervisors’Type A personality on this relationship.
      In order to test our hypotheses, we used survey-based data gathered from 390 super- visor-subordinate dyads in 86 South Korean companies. To alleviate potential common method variance, we asked supervisors to report on the levels of work overload, Type A personality, and burnout. On the other hand, subordinates assessed their supervisor’s abusive supervision level. We controlled for gender, age, supervisor-subordinate dyadic tenure, and leader-member exchange in all subsequent data analyses. We used SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 18 programs as analytic tools.
      The results of hierarchical regression analyses indicated that supervisors’ work overload was positively related to their burnout. This relationship was more pronounced when supervisors’ Type A personality was high than when it was low. Supervisors’ burnout was positively associated with their abusive supervision. The bootstrapping analysis showed that supervisors’ work overload exerted a significant indirect effect on their abusive supervision through burnout. Furthermore, we found a significant moderated- mediation effect, such that the indirect effect of supervisors’ work overload on abusive supervision through burnout was stronger for supervisors with high Type A personality than for those with low Type A personality. These findings contribute to the abusive supervision literature by attending to the roles of Type A personality and work overload in abusive supervision. Furthermore, the present findings offer practical implications to reduce abusive supervision in organizations.
      번역하기

      In today’s organizations, leadership is one of the most important factors of organi- zational effectiveness. However, many employees are suffering from the dark side of leadership exercised by their supervisors, which causes a great deal of negative...

      In today’s organizations, leadership is one of the most important factors of organi- zational effectiveness. However, many employees are suffering from the dark side of leadership exercised by their supervisors, which causes a great deal of negative effects and damage not only to employees but also to their organizations. Therefore, to suggest managerial solutions to the dark side of leadership, it is essential to examine potential personal and environmental factors affecting such leadership. Thus, in this study, we focused on ‘abusive supervision’(Tepper, 2000) as the dark side of leadership and explored the personal and environmental antecedents of abusive supervision. Abusive supervision is defined as employees’perceptions of the extent to which supervisors engage in the sustained display of hostile verbal and nonverbal behaviors, excluding physical contact(Tepper, 2000).
      We identified supervisors’ work overload and Type A personality as environmental and personal antecedents of abusive supervision, respectively. Work overload pertains to having many responsibilities and job demands in limited time. Type A personality is a personality trait that is highly sensitive to time pressure and achievement. Prior research on the antecedents of abusive supervision has examined environmental and personal factors separately. Complementing this line of research, we examined moderation and moderated-mediation effects of Type A personality by drawing on conservation of resources theory, frustration-aggression model, affective events theory, and ego depletion theory. More specifically, we proposed the mediating effect of supervisors’burnout on the relationship between work overload and abusive supervision and the interaction effect of supervisors’Type A personality on this relationship.
      In order to test our hypotheses, we used survey-based data gathered from 390 super- visor-subordinate dyads in 86 South Korean companies. To alleviate potential common method variance, we asked supervisors to report on the levels of work overload, Type A personality, and burnout. On the other hand, subordinates assessed their supervisor’s abusive supervision level. We controlled for gender, age, supervisor-subordinate dyadic tenure, and leader-member exchange in all subsequent data analyses. We used SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 18 programs as analytic tools.
      The results of hierarchical regression analyses indicated that supervisors’ work overload was positively related to their burnout. This relationship was more pronounced when supervisors’ Type A personality was high than when it was low. Supervisors’ burnout was positively associated with their abusive supervision. The bootstrapping analysis showed that supervisors’ work overload exerted a significant indirect effect on their abusive supervision through burnout. Furthermore, we found a significant moderated- mediation effect, such that the indirect effect of supervisors’ work overload on abusive supervision through burnout was stronger for supervisors with high Type A personality than for those with low Type A personality. These findings contribute to the abusive supervision literature by attending to the roles of Type A personality and work overload in abusive supervision. Furthermore, the present findings offer practical implications to reduce abusive supervision in organizations.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      최근에 들어서 많은 조직에서 상사의 비인격적 감독이 발생하고 있다. 이에 따라 개인뿐만 아 니라 조직 전체적으로도 많은 피해가 발생하고 있다. 본 문제에 대한 해결 방법을 고찰하고 관리 적 방안을 마련하기 위해서는 어떠한 환경적/개인적 선행 요인들이 상사들로 하여금 비인격적 감 독에 관여하도록 하는지를 밝히는 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 환경적인 요인으로써 업무 과 부하와 개인적 요인으로 Type A 성격 요인이 상호작용하여 상사의 번아웃을 일으키고 이는 상사 의 비인격적 감독으로 이어지는 관계를 검증하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이에 따라 다음과 같은 가설이 도출되었다. 가설 1은 상사의 업무 과부하는 상사의 번아웃과 정(+)의 관계를 가질 것으로 예측하였다. 가설 2는 상사의 Type A 성격 변수가 업무 과부하와 번아웃 간의 관계에서 상호작용 효과를 가질 것으로 예측한다. 가설 3은 상사의 번아웃과 비인격적 감독이 정(+)의 관계를 가질 것으로 예측한다. 가설 4는 업무 과부하와 비인격적 감독 간의 관계에 대한 번아웃의 매개 효과 를 상정한다. 가설 5는 Type A의 조절된 매개 효과를 예측한다. 이러한 가설 검증을 위해 다양한 한국 기업들의 상사-부하 390쌍을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 상사의 성별, 나이, 부하와의 재직기간, 상사-부하 교환관계를 통제한 SPSS 분석 결과, 모든 가설은 지지되었다. 즉, 상사의 업 무 과부하와 번아웃과 관계는 정(+)적으로 유의미했으며, 번아웃을 매개로 하여 비인격적 감독으로 연결되는 것으로 발견되었다. 이 과정에서 성취욕이 높거나 시간적 압박을 많이 받는 Type A 성 격을 가진 상사의 경우, 업무 과부하 상황 하에서 더 많은 번아웃을 경험하고 이에 따라 비인격적 감독 행위에 관여할 가능성이 높아진다는 점을 입증하였다.
      본 연구는 앞서 비인격적 감독의 선행요인을 밝히는 연구들에서 다뤄지지 않았던 환경과 개인 변수들의 상호작용을 연구했다는 점에서 비인격적 감독 문헌의 이론적 폭을 확장하는데 기여한다. 본 연구 결과는 또한 앞으로의 비인격적 감독의 선행 요인을 밝히는 연구에 있어서 개인적 요인 과 맥락적 요인을 따로 구분하여 연구하는 것이 아닌, 둘 간의 상호작용 효과를 고려해야 한다는 시사점을 제공한다. 마지막으로 본 연구 결과를 기반으로 실무적 시사점 및 향후 연구를 위한 제 언을 제시한다.
      번역하기

      최근에 들어서 많은 조직에서 상사의 비인격적 감독이 발생하고 있다. 이에 따라 개인뿐만 아 니라 조직 전체적으로도 많은 피해가 발생하고 있다. 본 문제에 대한 해결 방법을 고찰하고 관...

      최근에 들어서 많은 조직에서 상사의 비인격적 감독이 발생하고 있다. 이에 따라 개인뿐만 아 니라 조직 전체적으로도 많은 피해가 발생하고 있다. 본 문제에 대한 해결 방법을 고찰하고 관리 적 방안을 마련하기 위해서는 어떠한 환경적/개인적 선행 요인들이 상사들로 하여금 비인격적 감 독에 관여하도록 하는지를 밝히는 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 환경적인 요인으로써 업무 과 부하와 개인적 요인으로 Type A 성격 요인이 상호작용하여 상사의 번아웃을 일으키고 이는 상사 의 비인격적 감독으로 이어지는 관계를 검증하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이에 따라 다음과 같은 가설이 도출되었다. 가설 1은 상사의 업무 과부하는 상사의 번아웃과 정(+)의 관계를 가질 것으로 예측하였다. 가설 2는 상사의 Type A 성격 변수가 업무 과부하와 번아웃 간의 관계에서 상호작용 효과를 가질 것으로 예측한다. 가설 3은 상사의 번아웃과 비인격적 감독이 정(+)의 관계를 가질 것으로 예측한다. 가설 4는 업무 과부하와 비인격적 감독 간의 관계에 대한 번아웃의 매개 효과 를 상정한다. 가설 5는 Type A의 조절된 매개 효과를 예측한다. 이러한 가설 검증을 위해 다양한 한국 기업들의 상사-부하 390쌍을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 상사의 성별, 나이, 부하와의 재직기간, 상사-부하 교환관계를 통제한 SPSS 분석 결과, 모든 가설은 지지되었다. 즉, 상사의 업 무 과부하와 번아웃과 관계는 정(+)적으로 유의미했으며, 번아웃을 매개로 하여 비인격적 감독으로 연결되는 것으로 발견되었다. 이 과정에서 성취욕이 높거나 시간적 압박을 많이 받는 Type A 성 격을 가진 상사의 경우, 업무 과부하 상황 하에서 더 많은 번아웃을 경험하고 이에 따라 비인격적 감독 행위에 관여할 가능성이 높아진다는 점을 입증하였다.
      본 연구는 앞서 비인격적 감독의 선행요인을 밝히는 연구들에서 다뤄지지 않았던 환경과 개인 변수들의 상호작용을 연구했다는 점에서 비인격적 감독 문헌의 이론적 폭을 확장하는데 기여한다. 본 연구 결과는 또한 앞으로의 비인격적 감독의 선행 요인을 밝히는 연구에 있어서 개인적 요인 과 맥락적 요인을 따로 구분하여 연구하는 것이 아닌, 둘 간의 상호작용 효과를 고려해야 한다는 시사점을 제공한다. 마지막으로 본 연구 결과를 기반으로 실무적 시사점 및 향후 연구를 위한 제 언을 제시한다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 연합뉴스, "직장인 97% “상사갑질 경험해”"

      2 박상언, "직무요구-통제 모형에 의한 사원들의 직무소진(Job Burnout)에 관한 연구: 적극적 성격과 자기효능감 변수의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국인사관리학회 30 (30): 46-70, 2006

      3 최병권, "업무과부하, 직무소진, 이직의도의 관계에서 직무자율성과경력성장기회의 조절효과" 한국인사관리학회 37 (37): 145-170, 2013

      4 김영조, "서비스 직원의 감정노동 수행과 직무소진의 관계에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 32 (32): 95-128, 2008

      5 박선진, "서두름 행동과 A형 행동의 관계" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 18 (18): 153-167, 2012

      6 이경근, "상사의 비인격적 감독이 조직시민행동과 이직의도에 미치는영향: 자부심과 존중감의 역할" 한국인사관리학회 37 (37): 65-92, 2013

      7 정수진, "비인격적 감독행위와 조직성과 및 자아 존중감, 사회적 지원의 영향력에 관한 연구" 한국산업경제학회 27 (27): 1285-1308, 2014

      8 한주원, "비인격적 감독의 선행요인과 부하의 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 34 (34): 61-89, 2010

      9 Schaufeli, W. B., "Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement:Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well‐being?" 57 (57): 173-203, 2008

      10 Janssen, P. P., "Work-related and individual determinants of the three burnout dimensions" 13 (13): 74-86, 1999

      1 연합뉴스, "직장인 97% “상사갑질 경험해”"

      2 박상언, "직무요구-통제 모형에 의한 사원들의 직무소진(Job Burnout)에 관한 연구: 적극적 성격과 자기효능감 변수의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국인사관리학회 30 (30): 46-70, 2006

      3 최병권, "업무과부하, 직무소진, 이직의도의 관계에서 직무자율성과경력성장기회의 조절효과" 한국인사관리학회 37 (37): 145-170, 2013

      4 김영조, "서비스 직원의 감정노동 수행과 직무소진의 관계에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 32 (32): 95-128, 2008

      5 박선진, "서두름 행동과 A형 행동의 관계" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 18 (18): 153-167, 2012

      6 이경근, "상사의 비인격적 감독이 조직시민행동과 이직의도에 미치는영향: 자부심과 존중감의 역할" 한국인사관리학회 37 (37): 65-92, 2013

      7 정수진, "비인격적 감독행위와 조직성과 및 자아 존중감, 사회적 지원의 영향력에 관한 연구" 한국산업경제학회 27 (27): 1285-1308, 2014

      8 한주원, "비인격적 감독의 선행요인과 부하의 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 34 (34): 61-89, 2010

      9 Schaufeli, W. B., "Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement:Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well‐being?" 57 (57): 173-203, 2008

      10 Janssen, P. P., "Work-related and individual determinants of the three burnout dimensions" 13 (13): 74-86, 1999

      11 Khan, A. K., "When and how subordinate performance leads to abusive supervision : A social dominance perspective" 44 (44): 2081-2826, 2016

      12 Rauhala, A., "What degree of work overload is likely to cause increased sickness absenteeism among nurses? Evidence from the RAFAELA patient classification system" 57 (57): 286-295, 2007

      13 Grandey, A. A., "Verbal abuse from outsiders versus insiders : Comparing frequency, impact on emotional exhaustion, and the role of emotional labor" 12 (12): 63-79, 2007

      14 Waldron, I., "Type A behavior pattern : Relationship to variation in blood pressure, parental characteristics, and academic and social activities of students" 6 (6): 16-27, 1980

      15 Hallerg, U. E., "Type A behavior and work situation : Associations with burnout and work engagement" 48 (48): 135-142, 2007

      16 Friedman, M., "Type A Behavior Pattern: its association with coronary heart disease" 3 (3): 300-312, 1971

      17 Cross, S. E., "The what, how, why, and where of self-construal" 15 (15): 142-179, 2011

      18 Babakus, E., "The role of emotional exhaustion in sales force attitude and behavior relationships" 27 (27): 58-70, 1999

      19 Huang, I. C., "The role of burnout in the relationship between perceptions off organizational politics and turnover intentions" 32 (32): 519-531, 2003

      20 Yagil, D., "The relationship of abusive and supportive workplace supervision to employee burnout and upward influence tactics" 6 (6): 49-65, 2006

      21 Bolino, M. C., "The personal costs of citizenship behavior : the relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict" 90 (90): 740-748, 2005

      22 Law, M., "The person-environment-occupation model : A transactive approach to occupational performance" 63 (63): 9-23, 1996

      23 Schaufeli, W. B., "The measurement of engagement and burnout : A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach" 3 (3): 71-92, 2002

      24 Demerouti, E., "The loss spiral of work pressure, work-home interference and exhaustion : Reciprocal relations in a three-wave study" 64 (64): 131-149, 2004

      25 Weigl, M., "The associations of supervisor support and work overload with burnout and depression : a cross‐sectional study in two nursing settings" 72 (72): 1774-1788, 2016

      26 Celik, K., "The Effect of Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict on Performance of Vice Principals: The Mediating Role of Burnout" 51 : 195-213, 2013

      27 Eissa, G., "Supervisor role overload and frustration as antecedents of abusive supervision : The moderating role of supervisor personality" 38 (38): 307-326, 2017

      28 Nirel, N., "Stress, work overload, burnout, and satisfaction among paramedics in Israel" 23 (23): 537-546, 2008

      29 American Psychological Association, "Stress in american: Paying with our health" American Psychological Association 1-23, 2015

      30 Moos, R. H., "Specialized living environments for older people : A conceptual framework for evaluation" 36 (36): 75-94, 1980

      31 Brown, G. W., "Social support, self-esteem and depression" 16 (16): 813-831, 1986

      32 Marcelissen, F. H., "Social support and occupational stress : A causal analysis" 26 (26): 365-373, 1988

      33 Baron, R. A., "Social and personal determinants of workplace aggression : Evidence for the impact of perceived injustice and the type A behaviour pattern" 25 : 281-296, 1999

      34 Peters, L. H., "Situational constraints and work outcomes : The influences of a frequently overlooked construct" 5 (5): 391-397, 1980

      35 Beehr, T. A., "Relationships of stress to individually and organizationally valued states : Higher order needs as a moderator" 61 (61): 41-47, 1976

      36 Storms, P. L., "Relationships of organizational frustration with reported behavioural reactions : The moderating effect of locus of control" 60 (60): 227-234, 1987

      37 De Clercq, D., "Reducing the harmful effect of work overload on creative behaviour : Buffering roles of energyenhancing resources" 28 (28): 5-18, 2019

      38 Mattews, K. A., "Psychological perspectives on the type A behavior pattern" 91 (91): 293-323, 1982

      39 Whitman, M. V., "Psychological entitlement and abusive supervision : Political skill as a self-regulatory mechanism" 38 (38): 248-257, 2013

      40 Krantz, D. S., "Psychobiological substrates of the Type A behavior pattern" 2 (2): 393-411, 1983

      41 Jenkins, C. D., "Progress toward validation of a computer-scored test for the type A coronary-prone behavior pattern" 33 (33): 193-202, 1971

      42 Tepper, B. J., "Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision" 59 (59): 101-123, 2006

      43 Yam, K. C., "Out of control : A self-control perspective on the link between surface acting and abusive supervision" 101 (101): 292-302, 2016

      44 Leiter, M. P., "Nurse turnover : the mediating role of burnout" 17 (17): 331-339, 2009

      45 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" Prentice Hall International 1998

      46 Aiken, L. S., "Multiple regression : Testing and interpreting interactions" Sage 1991

      47 Cousins, R., "Management standards and workrelated stress practical development" 18 (18): 113-136, 2004

      48 Bakker, A. B., "Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout" 10 (10): 170-180, 2005

      49 Toker, S., "Job burnout and depression : Unraveling their temporal relationship and considering the role of physical activity" 97 (97): 699-710, 2012

      50 Maslach, C., "Job burnout" 52 (52): 397-422, 2001

      51 Schulz, P., "Increased free cortisol secretion after awakening in chronically stressed individuals due to work overload" 14 (14): 91-97, 1998

      52 Ahuja, M. K., "IT road warriors: Balancing work-family conflict, job autonomy, and work overload to mitigate turnover intentions" 31 (31): 1-17, 2007

      53 Anderson, C. A., "Human aggression" 53 (53): 297-323, 2002

      54 Mawritz, M. B., "Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping:Does conscientiousness matter?" 99 (99): 737-747, 2014

      55 Karatepe, O. M., "High-performance work practices and hotel employee performance : The mediation of work engagement" 32 : 132-140, 2013

      56 Harvey, P., "Frustration-based outcomes of entitlement and the influence of supervisor communication" 63 (63): 1639-1660, 2010

      57 Dollard, J., "Frustration and aggression" Yale University Press 1939

      58 Day, A. L., "Examining Type A behavior pattern to explain the relationship between job stressors and psychosocial outcomes" 7 (7): 109-120, 2002

      59 Mackey, J. D., "Empowered employees as social deviants : The role of abusive supervision" 30 (30): 149-162, 2015

      60 Baumeister, R. F., "Ego depletion and self‐regulation failure : A resource model of self‐control" 27 (27): 281-284, 2003

      61 Shirom, A., "Effects of work overload and burnout on cholesterol and triglycerides levels : The moderating efffects of emotional reactivity among male and female employees" 2 (2): 275-288, 1997

      62 Caplan, R. D., "Effects of work load, role ambiguity, and type A personality on anxiety, depression, and heart rate" 60 (60): 713-719, 1975

      63 Dill, J. C., "Effects of frustration justification on hostile aggression" 21 (21): 359-369, 1995

      64 Glass, D. C., "Effect of harassment and competition upon cardiovascular and plasma catecholamine responses in Type A and Type B individuals" 17 (17): 453-463, 1980

      65 Lian, H., "Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leadermember exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance" 117 (117): 41-52, 2012

      66 Barling, J., "Disentangling the relationship between the achievement striving and impatience ‒ irritability dimensions of type A behavior, performance and health" 13 (13): 369-377, 1992

      67 Fox, S., "Counterproductive work behavior(CWB)in response to job stressors and organizational justice : Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions" 59 (59): 291-309, 2001

      68 Kirmeyer, S. L., "Coping by police officers : A study of role stress and Type A and Type B behavior patterns" 6 (6): 183-195, 1985

      69 Hobfoll, S. E., "Conservation of resources : A new attempt at conceptualizing stress" 44 (44): 513-524, 1989

      70 Tepper, B. J., "Consequences of abusive supervision" 43 (43): 178-190, 2000

      71 Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method biases in behavioral research : A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies" 88 (88): 879-903, 2003

      72 Wright, T. A., "Commitment, psychological well-being and job performance: An examination of conservation of resources (COR) theory and job burnout" 9 (9): 389-406, 2004

      73 Gould‐Williams, J. S., "Civic duty and employee outcomes : do high commitment human resource practices and work overload matter?" 92 (92): 937-953, 2014

      74 Toppinen‐Tanner, S., "Burnout predicts hospitalization for mental and cardiovascular disorders: 10‐year prospective results from industrial sector" 25 (25): 287-296, 2009

      75 Zischka, P. C., "Burnout and the catalytic role of the supervisor" 1 (1): 43-52, 1983

      76 Melamed, S., "Burnout and risk of cardiovascular disease : Evidence, possible causal paths, and promising research directions" 132 (132): 327-353, 2006

      77 Kitaoka-Higashiguchi, K., "Burnout and risk factors for arteriosclerotic disease : follow-up study" 51 (51): 123-131, 2009

      78 Zhang, Y., "Antecedents of abusive supervision : A meta-analytic review" 139 (139): 455-471, 2016

      79 Saxton, M. J., "Antecedents and consequences of emotional exhaustion in the airline reservations service sector" 44 (44): 583-595, 1991

      80 Weiss, H. M., "Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work" JAI Press 1996

      81 Bies, R. J., "Advances in Organizational Behavior:Forthcoming" Stanford University Press 2000

      82 Tepper, B. J., "Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance : A power/dependence analysis" 109 (109): 156-167, 2009

      83 Tepper, B. J., "Abusive supervision in work organizations : Review, synthesis, and research agenda" 33 (33): 261-289, 2007

      84 Mitchell, M. S., "Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs" 92 (92): 1159-1168, 2007

      85 Carlson, D., "Abusive supervision and work-family conflict : The path through emotional labor and burnout" 23 (23): 849-859, 2012

      86 Zellars, K. L., "Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior" 87 (87): 1068-1076, 2002

      87 Hoobler, J. M., "Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression" 91 (91): 1125-1133, 2006

      88 Wu, T. Y., "Abusive supervision and employee emotional exhaustion : Dispositional antecedents and boundaries" 34 (34): 143-169, 2009

      89 Mackey, J. D., "Abusive supervision : A meta-analysis and empirical review" 43 (43): 1940-1965, 2017

      90 Tepper, B. J., "Abusive supervision" 4 : 123-152, 2017

      91 Mawritz, M. B., "A trickle‐down model of abusive supervision" 65 (65): 325-357, 2012

      92 Cordes, C. L., "A review and an integration of research on job burnout" 18 (18): 621-656, 1993

      93 Fisher, D. M., "A multilevel crosscultural examination of role overload and organizational commitment : Investigating the interactive effects of context" 99 (99): 723-736, 2014

      94 Kaplan, S., "A model of personenvironment compatibility" 15 (15): 311-332, 1983

      95 Hoobler, J. M., "A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect" 24 (24): 256-269, 2013

      96 Barnes, C. M., ""You wouldn’t like me when I’m sleepy" : Leaders’ sleep, daily abusive supervision, and work unit engagement" 58 (58): 1419-1437, 2015

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-02-26 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association Of Personnel Administration -> Korean Academy of Organization and Management KCI등재
      2010-02-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사관리연구 -> 조직과 인사관리연구
      외국어명 : The Korean Personnel Administration Journal -> Journal of Organization and Management
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.35 2.35 2.29
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.36 2.41 4.335 0.59
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼