RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      오이디푸스를 넘어서 - 프로이트에서 라캉으로  :  오이디푸스를 넘어서 = Beyond Oedipus: From Freud to Lacan

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76457914

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This essay is an examination of the way in which the Oedipus complex, which is traditionally regarded as the centerpiece of Freudian theory, is reinterpreted by Jacques Lacan in the light of what he calls the ‘formulas of metaphor’ or the signifying substitution.
      Freudian theory of the Oedipus Complex, which is concerned with such critical issues as the formation of the human subject, the logic of affects, and the question of sexual difference, tends to be articulated largely in terms of the real family structure, as is manifested in his phrase ‘family romance.’
      On the other hand, Lacanian approach to the Oedipal structure is mainly structural and linguistic, with the paternal signifier ‘Name-of-the-Father’ substituted for the ‘Desire of the Mother’ resulting in the structure of the ‘Name-of-the-Father’ (Other/Phallus). Otherwise said, the overcoming of the Oedipal conflict means in Lacanian terms a successful accession to the symbolic order or the big Other (O), set of signifiers and a birth of the human subject with sexual identity, securing a phallic meaning (Ф).
      According to Lacan, the difference between the mother and the father, even when it is sexually marked, cannot be ‘translated’ into the difference between the man and the woman. Every attempt at such symbolic translation leaves a ‘surplus-effect,’ which is the real of sexual difference.
      The last part of the essay is devoted to the way in which the human subject is differently positioned with respect to the Other. This different subject position vis-?-vis the Other explains what Lacan calls ‘sexuation’ and the Other jouissance as distinguished from the phallic jouissance.
      번역하기

      This essay is an examination of the way in which the Oedipus complex, which is traditionally regarded as the centerpiece of Freudian theory, is reinterpreted by Jacques Lacan in the light of what he calls the ‘formulas of metaphor’ or the signif...

      This essay is an examination of the way in which the Oedipus complex, which is traditionally regarded as the centerpiece of Freudian theory, is reinterpreted by Jacques Lacan in the light of what he calls the ‘formulas of metaphor’ or the signifying substitution.
      Freudian theory of the Oedipus Complex, which is concerned with such critical issues as the formation of the human subject, the logic of affects, and the question of sexual difference, tends to be articulated largely in terms of the real family structure, as is manifested in his phrase ‘family romance.’
      On the other hand, Lacanian approach to the Oedipal structure is mainly structural and linguistic, with the paternal signifier ‘Name-of-the-Father’ substituted for the ‘Desire of the Mother’ resulting in the structure of the ‘Name-of-the-Father’ (Other/Phallus). Otherwise said, the overcoming of the Oedipal conflict means in Lacanian terms a successful accession to the symbolic order or the big Other (O), set of signifiers and a birth of the human subject with sexual identity, securing a phallic meaning (Ф).
      According to Lacan, the difference between the mother and the father, even when it is sexually marked, cannot be ‘translated’ into the difference between the man and the woman. Every attempt at such symbolic translation leaves a ‘surplus-effect,’ which is the real of sexual difference.
      The last part of the essay is devoted to the way in which the human subject is differently positioned with respect to the Other. This different subject position vis-?-vis the Other explains what Lacan calls ‘sexuation’ and the Other jouissance as distinguished from the phallic jouissance.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 오이디푸스 콤플렉스
      • Ⅱ. ‘아버지의 이름’의 메타포
      • Ⅲ. 팰러스: 성적 주체성
      • 인용문헌
      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 오이디푸스 콤플렉스
      • Ⅱ. ‘아버지의 이름’의 메타포
      • Ⅲ. 팰러스: 성적 주체성
      • 인용문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "라캉: 재현과 그 불만" 서울: 문학과 지성사 2006

      2 "The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud" 24 s : 1953-74

      3 "The Seminar of Jacques Lacan XX the Limits of Love and Knowledge" 1972-731998

      4 "The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance" Princeton: Princeton UP 1995

      5 "The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis" 1977

      6 "Lacanian Theory of Discourse" 1994

      7 "Lacan's Major Work on Love" Albany: SUNY P 2002

      8 "Lacan and Philosophy" The Cambridge Companion to Lacan" Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2003

      9 "Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis" New York: Other P 1998

      10 "From Freud to Lacan Newsletter of the Freudian Field" 30-50, 1989

      1 "라캉: 재현과 그 불만" 서울: 문학과 지성사 2006

      2 "The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud" 24 s : 1953-74

      3 "The Seminar of Jacques Lacan XX the Limits of Love and Knowledge" 1972-731998

      4 "The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance" Princeton: Princeton UP 1995

      5 "The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis" 1977

      6 "Lacanian Theory of Discourse" 1994

      7 "Lacan's Major Work on Love" Albany: SUNY P 2002

      8 "Lacan and Philosophy" The Cambridge Companion to Lacan" Cambridge: Cambridge UP 2003

      9 "Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis" New York: Other P 1998

      10 "From Freud to Lacan Newsletter of the Freudian Field" 30-50, 1989

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학회명변경 영문명 : The Criticism And Theory Society Of Korea -> The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-11-28 학술지등록 한글명 : 비평과이론
      외국어명 : The Journal of Criticism and Theory
      KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.51
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.43 0.36 1.442 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼