과학탐구기능 교수,학습 자료를 활용한 명시적 수업이 중학생의 과학탐구능력에 미치는 효과 : “광합성” 단원을 중심으로 = The Effects of Explicit Instruction using Teaching-Learning Materials for Improving Middle School Students' Science Process Skills - Focused on “Photosynthesis” Unit

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of teaching-learning materials for science process skills applying explicit instructional model. These materials were composed of 3 levels for explicit instruction about science process skills; ‘explanation and demonstration’, ‘guided practice’, and ‘independent practice’. And the topics of materials were based on ‘Photosynthesis’ unit of the 2009 revised curriculum. For this study, 4 lessons using these materials were applied to the experimental group, while the traditional lessons using inquiry activities in textbook were applied to the control group. And science process skill test were carried out before and after lessons. The result of posttest showed that the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant in overall science process skills, although the experimental group scored higher than the control group. But the experimental group scored higher than the control group meaningfully in observation (p<.05) and data interpretation (p<.01). Also, the students in experimental group improved their overall science process skills meaningfully (p<.001), and they had great improvements in observation (p<.01), data transformation (p<.01), and data interpretation (p<.01) after explicit instruction using teaching-learning materials for science process skills. And most of them had positive thoughtsabout the lessons. Based on these results, the explicit instruction using teaching-learning materials for science process skills are effective in improving middle school students' science process skills. In addition, these materials can be complements to inquiry activities of science textbook to improve students' science process skills in school.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이은주, "탐구 기능의 직접적 수업을 위한 탐구 기능 하위 요소 추출" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 236-264, 2012

2 이혜원, "초등학생의 과학탐구기능 향상을 위한 명시적이고 반성적인 교수․학습전략 개발 및 적용 -관찰과 분류를 중심으로-" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 95-112, 2012

3 홍석준, "중학생의 기초 탐구 기능 이해를 위한 명시적 교수∙학습 전략의 개발 및 적용 사례 분석" 한국과학교육학회 31 (31): 641-662, 2011

4 김경순, "중학교 과학 ‘물질의 구성’ 단원에서 과학사 소재를 활용한 명시적ㆍ반성적 과학의 본성 수업의 효과" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 89-99, 2008

5 오영린, "제7차와 2007 개정 교육과정의 중학교 과학 교과서 ‘식물의 영양’관련 단원의 탐구활동 비교" 과학교육연구소 36 (36): 35-48, 2012

6 이형철, "자유탐구 수업이 초등학생의 과학적 태도 및 과학탐구능력에 미치는 영향과 지도교사들의 자유탐구에 대한 인식 조사" 과학교육연구소 34 (34): 405-420, 2010

7 변선미, "자유 탐구 활동에 대한 중학생들의 인식 및 자유 탐구 활동이 중학생들의 과학 탐구능력에 미치는 영향" 한국과학교육학회 31 (31): 210-224, 2011

8 이혜정, "과학적 관찰 전략을 적용한 과학수업에서 초등학교 6학년 학생들의 관찰지식 생성에 대한 연구" 한국과학교육학회 30 (30): 13-26, 2010

9 한수진, "과학 탐구의 본성에 대한 명시적-반성적 탐구 학습 프로그램의 영향" 대한화학회 57 (57): 115-126, 2013

10 김유향, "과학 탐구 사고력 측정을 위한 서술형 평가 도구 개발" 한국생물교육학회 40 (40): 167-177, 2012

11 Kim, Y., "The major principles and effects of direct instruction on students with learning disabilities and under-achievements in inclusive education" 4 (4): 45-67, 2007

12 Lee, M., "The effects of free inquiry activities on the science process skills and scientific attitudes of elementary school students" Korea National University of Education, Chungbu k, South Korea 2002

13 Rosenshine, B. V., "The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education" Cambridge University Press 143-149, 1995

14 Khishife, R., "Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic : Integrated versus nonintegrated" 43 (43): 395-418, 2006

15 Bybee, R. W, "Teaching Secondary School Science; Strategies for Developing Scientific Literacy" Merill 2008

16 Lawson, A. E., "Teaching Inquiry Science in Middle and Secondary Schools" Sage Publications, Inc 2010

17 Ledermann, N. G., "Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science : A review of the research" 29 (29): 331-359, 1992

18 Chiappetta, E. L., "Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools" Merill 1998

19 MOEST(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology), "Science Curriculum" Ministry of Education, Science and Te-chnology 2009

20 Chung, W., "Relationships between students' scientific reasoning levels and thinking patterns of biological inquiries in junior high school science textbook" 27 (27): 202-210, 1999

21 American Association for Advancement of Science, "Project 2061 : Science for All Americans" American Association for Advancement of Science 1989

22 National Research Council, "Inquiry and National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning" National Academy Press 1996

23 Khishife, R., "Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiryoriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science" 39 (39): 551-578, 2002

24 Rosenshine, B. V., "Handbook of Research on Teaching" Macmillan 1986

25 Rosenshine, B. V., "Five Meanings of Direct Instruction" Academic Development Institute Center on Innovation and Improvement 2008

26 Archer, A. L, "Explicit Instruction:Effective and Efficient Teaching" The Guilford Press 2011

27 National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum, "Explicit Instruction-Effective Classroom Practice Report" 2002

28 Chinn, C. A., "Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools : A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks" 86 (86): 175-218, 2002

29 Lee, H., "Development and application of the explicit and reflective learning model for the enhancement of scientific inquiry skills of elementary school students-based on observation and classification" Dankook University, Seoul, South Korea 2011

30 American Association for Advancement of Science, "Benchmarks for All Americans" Oxford University Press, Inc 1993

31 Lee, E., "A study of direct teaching strategy of inquiry skills applying meta-cognition" Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea 2010

32 강남화, "2009 개정 과학교육과정에 따른 고등학교 물리 교과서 탐구활동 분석" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 132-143, 2013