이광수의 중국 심상지리와 민족 담론

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This dissertation is the purpose that it examines in the literature of Lee Gwang-soo whether it was formed and the Imaginative Geography about China became image with the then national discussion or not because of being how.
It was the space realizing the ambivalence of the imperialism and Shanghai was the space of the possibility breaking away from the colony to Lee Gwang-soo. But shanghai didn’t have the hope of the independence any more. It was the space of the frustration which cannot realize the national discussion putting the foundation on the civilization.
Negatively Beijing’s Imaginative Geography is reappeared in His Autobiography in the literature of Lee Gwang-soo. Happen that in the difference of the spatial image transcendentally formed with the experience space. A priori formed Chinese image is the space of Beijing and the layer to Lee Gwang-soo. That is, negatively Beijing’s Imaginative Geography was formed by the eye line of the memory of the common called history and imitated empire.
It is included in the latter half of His Autobiography in Orient’s category and negatively the Imaginative Geography of formed Beijing is converted to the other image. Lee Gwang-soo is overcoming the negative image about Beijing with the thinking method of his causationism.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 문명화론의 이중성과 환멸의 공간으로서 ‘상해’
• 3. 서사화된 기억의 북경과 식민주의적 의식
• 4. 결론
• 참고문헌
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 유인순, "한국소설 속의 서울 그리고 중국" 한중인문학회 (26) : 1-26, 2009

2 김윤식, "이광수와 그의 시대 1" 솔 2001

3 이광수, "이광수 전집 9권" 삼중당 1972

4 이광수, "이광수 전집 7권" 삼중당 1972

5 이광수, "이광수 전집 6권" 삼중당 1972

6 이광수, "이광수 전집 10권" 삼중당 1972

7 김경미, "이광수 문학과 민족 담론" 역락 2011

8 에드워드 사이드, "오리엔탈리즘" 교보문고 1992

9 전진성, "역사가 기억을 말하다" 휴머니스트 2005

10 하타노 세츠코, "무정을 읽는다" 소명출판 2008

11 "매일신보"

12 정주아, "心象地理imaginary geography의 외부, ‘불확실성의 심연’과 문학적 공간 －春園 李光洙의 문학에 나타난 러시아의 공간성을 중심으로－" 한국어문교육연구회 41 (41): 251-275, 2013

13 손과지, "北京지역 한인독립운동세력과 대한민국임시정부" 동양학연구원 (54) : 151-166, 2013

14 김경미, "1930년대 전반기 이광수의 만주 인식과 민족 담론" 한국문학언어학회 (62) : 371-397, 2014