RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사회언어적 능력의 관점에서 본 「본문 회화」의 실제와 과제 = The Status quo and further issues of 「Conversations in Textbooks」 in terms of Sociolinguistic competence

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82640095

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study will serve as a previous step taken for offering “Syllabus for building Sociolinguistic competence”, in which the conversation extracts from Japanese textbooks being used in University were reflected and analyzed. The important implicat...

      This study will serve as a previous step taken for offering “Syllabus for building Sociolinguistic competence”, in which the conversation extracts from Japanese textbooks being used in University were reflected and analyzed. The important implications are as follows.
      (1) 60.2% of cases are impossible to discern what the characters’ relationship is, while 39.7% are discernable through the context.
      (2) Places of conversations taking place are not detailed as 71.1% of the total.
      (3) In the case of conversational patterns and topics appearing in textbook, the conversation form, conversational partners taking their turns, takes up 83.3%, whereas one-side Q & A form, one side asking question to the other and yet not vise versa, is shown only 16.7%. And more than 60% of topics are adopted from places and everyday staff regardless of the conversation patterns of textbooks.
      (4) As for the formality level of conversations in textbooks, Des · Mas forms are found the most as 82.5%, followed by non-Des · Mas form employed partly as 11.0%, and then non-Des form and non-Mas form are seen, accounting for 4.5%. Finally level shift as in Des · Mas form into non-Des · non-Mas (that is, from more formal form to less formal form and vise versa) comes out as merely 2.0%.
      Inflecting the status quo the above, it brings us to a point at which we need to consider the further issues as follows.
      (1) It is necessary that the relationships between the characters in conversation involve the degree of acquaintance, closeness, hierarchy as well as their genders in more detailed fashion. Especially, just not simply revealing surname and given name for suggesting genders, more male and female languages should be imbedded in conversation in an appropriate manner, leading to more learning experiences. Furthermore, when it comes to degree of closeness, there should be a list defining clear and accurate descriptions such as “very close or not that close” And, last but not least, there is the need that we consider and create a balance in terms of social or age-related hierarchical relationship.
      (2) There is the need to increase opportunities to practice the gaps of Japanese expressions depending on where conversations take place in the public place or private place, not to mention the specific place name.
      (3) It is assumed that the adjustment in using Des · Mas form or non-Des · Mas form is significantly critical in accordance with conversational partners so that their usages may be appropriate.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 사회언어적 능력 양성의 필요성
      • Ⅱ. 고찰 자료와 고찰 범위
      • Ⅲ. 본문 회화에 나타난 등장인물의 인간관계
      • Ⅳ. 본문 회화의 회화 장소
      • Ⅴ. 본문 회화의 회화 패턴과 화제
      • Ⅰ. 사회언어적 능력 양성의 필요성
      • Ⅱ. 고찰 자료와 고찰 범위
      • Ⅲ. 본문 회화에 나타난 등장인물의 인간관계
      • Ⅳ. 본문 회화의 회화 장소
      • Ⅴ. 본문 회화의 회화 패턴과 화제
      • Ⅵ. 본문 회화의 사회언어 레벨
      • Ⅶ. 본문 회화의 실제와 과제
      • 참고문헌
      • 【논문초록】
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼