RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사용자 간 신뢰관계 네트워크 분석을 활용한 협업 필터링 알고리즘의 예측 정확도 개선

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102086647

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Among the techniques for recommendation, collaborative filtering (CF) is commonly recognized to be the most effective for implementing recommender systems. Until now, CF has been popularly studied and adopted in both academic and real-world applicatio...

      Among the techniques for recommendation, collaborative filtering (CF) is commonly recognized to be the most effective for implementing recommender systems. Until now, CF has been popularly studied and adopted in both academic and real-world applications. The basic idea of CF is to create recommendation results by finding correlations between users of a recommendation system. CF system compares users based on how similar they are, and recommend products to users by using other like-minded people’s results of evaluation for each product. Thus, it is very important to compute evaluation similarities among users in CF because the recommendation quality depends on it. Typical CF uses user’s explicit numeric ratings of items (i.e. quantitative information) when computing the similarities among users in CF. In other words, user’s numeric ratings have been a sole source of user preference information in traditional CF. However, user ratings are unable to fully reflect user’s actual preferences from time to time. According to several studies, users may more actively accommodate recommendation of reliable others when purchasing goods. Thus, trust relationship can be regarded as the informative source for identifying user’s preference with accuracy.
      Under this background, we propose a new hybrid recommender system that fuses CF and social network analysis (SNA). The proposed system adopts the recommendation algorithm that additionally reflect the result analyzed by SNA. In detail, our proposed system is based on conventional memory-based CF, but it is designed to use both user’s numeric ratings and trust relationship information between users when calculating user similarities. For this, our system creates and uses not only user-item rating matrix, but also user-to-user trust network. As the methods for calculating user similarity between users, we proposed two alternatives – one is algorithm calculating the degree of similarity between users by utilizing in-degree and out-degree centrality, which are the indices representing the central location in the social network. We named these approaches as ‘Trust CF – All’ and ‘Trust CF – Conditional’. The other alternative is the algorithm reflecting a neighbor’s score higher when a target user trusts the neighbor directly or indirectly. The direct or indirect trust relationship can be identified by searching trust network of users. In this study, we call this approach ‘Trust CF – Search’.
      To validate the applicability of the proposed system, we used experimental data provided by LibRec that crawled from the entire FilmTrust website. It consists of ratings of movies and trust relationship network indicating who to trust between users. The experimental system was implemented using Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) and UCINET 6. To examine the effectiveness of the proposed system, we compared the performance of our proposed method with one of conventional CF system. The performances of recommender system were evaluated by using average MAE (mean absolute error). The analysis results confirmed that in case of applying without conditions the in-degree centrality index of trusted network of users(i.e. Trust CF - All), the accuracy (MAE = 0.565134) was lower than conventional CF (MAE = 0.564966). And, in case of applying the in-degree centrality index only to the users with the out-degree centrality above a certain threshold value(i.e. Trust CF - Conditional), the proposed system improved the accuracy a little (MAE = 0.564909) compared to traditional CF. However, the algorithm searching based on the trusted network of users (i.e. Trust CF – Search) was found to show the best performance (MAE = 0.564846). And the result from paired samples t-test presented that Trust CF - Search outperformed conventional CF with 10% statistical significance level. Our study sheds a light on the application of user’s trust relationship network information for facilitating electronic commerce by rec

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박준형, "특허 인용 관계가 기업 성과에 미치는 영향 : 소셜네트워크분석 관점" 한국지능정보시스템학회 19 (19): 127-139, 2013

      2 이재식, "장르별 협업필터링을 이용한 영화추천시스템의 성능 향상" 한국지능정보시스템학회 13 (13): 65-78, 2007

      3 조윤호, "신상품 추천을 위한 사회연결망분석의 활용" 한국지능정보시스템학회 15 (15): 183-200, 2009

      4 김민성, "소셜 네트워크 분석 기법을 활용한 협업필터링의 특이취향 사용자(Gray Sheep) 문제 해결" 한국지능정보시스템학회 20 (20): 137-148, 2014

      5 박종학, "사회연결망:신규고객 추천문제의 새로운 접근법" 한국지능정보시스템학회 15 (15): 123-140, 2009

      6 전병국, "사용자 리뷰 마이닝을 결합한 협업 필터링 시스템: 스마트폰 앱 추천에의 응용" 한국지능정보시스템학회 21 (21): 1-18, 2015

      7 김민건, "구조적 공백과 협업필터링을 이용한 추천시스템" 한국지능정보시스템학회 20 (20): 107-120, 2014

      8 김경재, "개인화된 추천시스템을 위한 사용자-상품 매트릭스 축약기법" 한국데이타베이스학회 16 (16): 97-113, 2009

      9 Zhang, Z., "urCF: User Review Enhanced Collaborative Filtering" 2014

      10 Liu, F., "Use of social network information to enhance collaborative filtering performance" 37 (37): 4772-4778, 2010

      1 박준형, "특허 인용 관계가 기업 성과에 미치는 영향 : 소셜네트워크분석 관점" 한국지능정보시스템학회 19 (19): 127-139, 2013

      2 이재식, "장르별 협업필터링을 이용한 영화추천시스템의 성능 향상" 한국지능정보시스템학회 13 (13): 65-78, 2007

      3 조윤호, "신상품 추천을 위한 사회연결망분석의 활용" 한국지능정보시스템학회 15 (15): 183-200, 2009

      4 김민성, "소셜 네트워크 분석 기법을 활용한 협업필터링의 특이취향 사용자(Gray Sheep) 문제 해결" 한국지능정보시스템학회 20 (20): 137-148, 2014

      5 박종학, "사회연결망:신규고객 추천문제의 새로운 접근법" 한국지능정보시스템학회 15 (15): 123-140, 2009

      6 전병국, "사용자 리뷰 마이닝을 결합한 협업 필터링 시스템: 스마트폰 앱 추천에의 응용" 한국지능정보시스템학회 21 (21): 1-18, 2015

      7 김민건, "구조적 공백과 협업필터링을 이용한 추천시스템" 한국지능정보시스템학회 20 (20): 107-120, 2014

      8 김경재, "개인화된 추천시스템을 위한 사용자-상품 매트릭스 축약기법" 한국데이타베이스학회 16 (16): 97-113, 2009

      9 Zhang, Z., "urCF: User Review Enhanced Collaborative Filtering" 2014

      10 Liu, F., "Use of social network information to enhance collaborative filtering performance" 37 (37): 4772-4778, 2010

      11 정중희, "UCC 추천을 위한 사회 네트워크 분석을 활용한 협업 필터링 기법 연구" 한국정보기술학회 11 (11): 185-195, 2013

      12 Sohn, D. W., "Social Network Analysis" Kyungmoon Publishing 2002

      13 Kwahk, K. Y., "Social Network Analysis" Cheongram 2014

      14 Sarwar, B., "Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms" 285-295, 2001

      15 Kim, K. -J, "Hybrid recommender systems using cluster-indexing collaborative filtering and soial network analysis" 604-609, 2010

      16 Golbeck, J., "Generating predictive movie recommendations from trust in social networks" 3986 : 93-104, 2006

      17 Breese, J. S., "Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering" 43-52, 1998

      18 Shinha, R., "Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends" 2001

      19 Kim, K. -J., "Collaborative Filtering with a User-Item Matrix Reduction Technique for Recommender Systems" 16 (16): 107-128, 2011

      20 Chen, P.-Y., "An Analysis of the Differential Impact of Reviews and Reviewers at Amazon.Com" 2007

      21 Herlocker, J., "An Algorithm Framework for Performing Collaborative Filtering" 230-237, 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-03-25 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Intelligent Information Systems Society KCI등재
      2015-03-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-02-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국지능정보시스템학회 논문지 -> 지능정보연구 KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.51 1.51 1.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.78 1.54 2.674 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼