RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      공공데이터베이스 이용법리의 재검토 = Legal Issue about Using of Public Sector Database

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99526909

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The current Korean Copyright Act gives some exclusive rights to database producer. This protection, notwithstanding creativity standard to protect copyright as a compilation work, is given due to substantial investment in its production. The right can be categorized as the neighbouring right granted to a performer, a phonogram producer or a broadcasting entity The right can be characterized as a sui-generis right with property law principles, which means that Database is not in public domain and cannot be exploited without authorization
      However, it is not clear whether the Copyright Act and the National Property Act authorize the government to have and manage public sector database.
      Therefore it needs to be studied that some exclusive rights given to public sector database producer, such as the government and public organizations, are equivalent to rights of private sector database producer under the Copyright Act.
      If some exclusive rights are entitled to public sector database producer like database producer under the Copyright Act, the government would have the exclusive rights and users have to ask permission to exploite public sector database abiding by The National Property Act(from government before exploiting the public sector database according to the National Property Act). The National Property Act regulates or controls of licensing the national property because use of national property can be unreasonable to the public interest and unfair to another user. But use of public sector database is different to the national property.
      Thus the Copyright Act and the National Property law should not be applied to the public sector database.
      The public sector database is collected and managed for public interest, not for pecuniary profit, so has to be used by people in general including private enterprises except in the case that the database includes personal information or national security secrecy).
      Therefore, lawmaking reform governing using public sector database should be done in order to advance the public information policies in the actual administrative field.
      번역하기

      The current Korean Copyright Act gives some exclusive rights to database producer. This protection, notwithstanding creativity standard to protect copyright as a compilation work, is given due to substantial investment in its production. The right can...

      The current Korean Copyright Act gives some exclusive rights to database producer. This protection, notwithstanding creativity standard to protect copyright as a compilation work, is given due to substantial investment in its production. The right can be categorized as the neighbouring right granted to a performer, a phonogram producer or a broadcasting entity The right can be characterized as a sui-generis right with property law principles, which means that Database is not in public domain and cannot be exploited without authorization
      However, it is not clear whether the Copyright Act and the National Property Act authorize the government to have and manage public sector database.
      Therefore it needs to be studied that some exclusive rights given to public sector database producer, such as the government and public organizations, are equivalent to rights of private sector database producer under the Copyright Act.
      If some exclusive rights are entitled to public sector database producer like database producer under the Copyright Act, the government would have the exclusive rights and users have to ask permission to exploite public sector database abiding by The National Property Act(from government before exploiting the public sector database according to the National Property Act). The National Property Act regulates or controls of licensing the national property because use of national property can be unreasonable to the public interest and unfair to another user. But use of public sector database is different to the national property.
      Thus the Copyright Act and the National Property law should not be applied to the public sector database.
      The public sector database is collected and managed for public interest, not for pecuniary profit, so has to be used by people in general including private enterprises except in the case that the database includes personal information or national security secrecy).
      Therefore, lawmaking reform governing using public sector database should be done in order to advance the public information policies in the actual administrative field.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 문제의 소재
      • Ⅱ. 저작권법상 데이터베이스제작자 권리인정
      • Ⅲ. 공공데이터베이스의 법적 성격
      • Ⅳ. 공공데이터베이스 이용 법리의 재검토
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 문제의 소재
      • Ⅱ. 저작권법상 데이터베이스제작자 권리인정
      • Ⅲ. 공공데이터베이스의 법적 성격
      • Ⅳ. 공공데이터베이스 이용 법리의 재검토
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박수혁, "한국의 국유재산제도" 12 : 242-, 2001

      2 방석호, "포털의 검색서비스를 둘러싼 저작권 문제 분석" 사이버커뮤니케이션학회 23 (23): 39-67, 2007

      3 송영식, "저작권법개설(제3판)" 세창출판사 237-, 2003

      4 신재호, "온라인디지털콘텐츠산업발전법에 관한 소고- 디지털콘텐츠 보호방안을 중심으로 -" 한국산업재산권법학회 11 : 257-286, 2002

      5 이상정, "디지털화권과 온라인디지털 콘텐츠산업발전법" 한국저작권법학회 (2) : 24-, 2003

      6 채명기, "데이터베이스의 추가보호" 저작권심의조정위원회 112-, 2000

      7 임원선, "데이터베이스의 법적 보호와 관련한 이슈의 고찰-미국의 관련 입법 과정을 중심으로" (봄) : 12-, 2000

      8 안효질, "데이터베이스의 국제적 보호동향과 입법방향" (여름) : 65-, 2000

      9 박익환, "데이터베이스 제작자의 법적 보호" 한국산업재산권법학회 (15) : 253-308, 2004

      10 김민호, "국유재산의 효율적 관리․활용방안" 20-23, 2001

      1 박수혁, "한국의 국유재산제도" 12 : 242-, 2001

      2 방석호, "포털의 검색서비스를 둘러싼 저작권 문제 분석" 사이버커뮤니케이션학회 23 (23): 39-67, 2007

      3 송영식, "저작권법개설(제3판)" 세창출판사 237-, 2003

      4 신재호, "온라인디지털콘텐츠산업발전법에 관한 소고- 디지털콘텐츠 보호방안을 중심으로 -" 한국산업재산권법학회 11 : 257-286, 2002

      5 이상정, "디지털화권과 온라인디지털 콘텐츠산업발전법" 한국저작권법학회 (2) : 24-, 2003

      6 채명기, "데이터베이스의 추가보호" 저작권심의조정위원회 112-, 2000

      7 임원선, "데이터베이스의 법적 보호와 관련한 이슈의 고찰-미국의 관련 입법 과정을 중심으로" (봄) : 12-, 2000

      8 안효질, "데이터베이스의 국제적 보호동향과 입법방향" (여름) : 65-, 2000

      9 박익환, "데이터베이스 제작자의 법적 보호" 한국산업재산권법학회 (15) : 253-308, 2004

      10 김민호, "국유재산의 효율적 관리․활용방안" 20-23, 2001

      11 유지태, "국유재산관리의 법적 문제, 국유부동산 관리제도에 관한 법적 검토" 39-, 2001

      12 이헌묵, "공공기관이 보유하고 있는 저작물의 자유이용허락에 관한 법제도 연구" 법학연구원 문화.미디어.엔터테인먼트법연구소 5 (5): 49-73, 2011

      13 半田正夫, "著作權法槪說(第10版)" 一粒社 125-126, 2001

      14 "http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/"

      15 "http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2003/2498/made"

      16 "http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents"

      17 "http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/apr09/Klein.shtml"

      18 "http://www.cendi.gov/publications/04-8copyright.html#"

      19 Schricker, "Urheberrecht, Kommentar, 2.Aufl" C.H.Beck 24-, 1999

      20 "U.S.Copyright Office(1997), Report on Legal Protection for Databases"

      21 "Proposal for a Council Directive on the Legal Protection of Databases, COM(92)24 final, art.2"

      22 "PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION - UNLOCKING COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL"

      23 Barack Obama, "Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government"

      24 Jerome Reichman, "Intellectual Property Rights in Data?" 50 (50): 1997

      25 Dittrich, Robert, "Einige Bemerkungen zum Schutz schlichter Datenbanken"

      26 "Directive 96/6/EC on the Legal Protection of Database of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996"

      27 "Directive 2003/98/EC of European Parliament and of the Conucil on the re-use of public sector information"

      28 Jerome Reichman, "Database Protection at the Crossroads:Recent Developments and their Impact on Science and Technology" 14 (14): 1999

      29 "Copyright Rights in Performances, Publication Right, Database Right"

      30 "An International Treaty on the Protection of"

      31 National Research Council, "A Question of Balance, Private Rights and the Public Interest in Scientific and Technical Databases"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-10-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-10-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review KCI등재
      2008-05-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소
      영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.64 0.64 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.6 0.57 0.849 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼