한국어 화자와 네덜란드어 화자의 거절 화행 및 전략 연구 - 비교문화적 화용론의 관점에서 - = Study on Refusal Speech Act and Strategy between Korean speaker and Dutch speaker - Based on cross-cultural pragmatics

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This research investigates differences in tendencies and strategies on Refusal Speech Act (RSA) between Korean Native Speaker (KNS) and Dutch Native Speaker (DNS), based on Cross-Cultural Pragmatics (CCP). Furthermore, the aim of this study is to provide useful information on Intermediary Language Pragmatics (ILP) for Dutch Korean learners. In order to compare both groups’ RSA, familiarity between speaker-hearer and social status were set as variables. In addition, Discourse Completion Task (DCT) was carried out. 12 scenarios were given based on 3 themes: invite, request and suggest. From the DCT, an analysis of RSA and strategy usage was carried out. Also, a follow-up interview was conducted to identify the levels of anxiety, the role of variables and the subject’s motives in using different strategies on each scenario of RSA. The study showed, as for KNS, although the Refusal Strategy Use was more frequently displayed, the strategy itself was simple, in terms of its variety. Interestingly, many subjects exhibited similar refusal pattern, along with repetition of certain strategy. On the other hand, some strategies i.e. insist, and display of nonchalance were hardly observed. Moreover, KNS did not practice the direct refusal strategy in 8 scenarios. This tendency was accentuated when the other interlocutor’s social status was higher than that of the speaker. On the contrary, DNS practiced various strategies, which leads to no sign of RSA pattern. Also, regardless of the counterpart’s social status, DNS manifested frequent usage of direct refusal strategy. Additionally, unlike KNS, the closer speaker-listener relationship was, the more strategy was adopted. Such differences can be explained by sociocultural differences between Korea and The Netherlands. To this extent, when teaching Korean RSA to Dutch Korean learner (DKL), we need to consider the differences in two cultures and make sure to explain Korean socio-cultural characteristics like politeness and speaker-hearer relationship to DKL.
(Sookmyung Women’s University)

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강현화, "한국어표현능력 향상을 위한 담화기능별 문형표현 단위에 대한 연구*: ‘거절’의 담화기능을 중심으로" 한국응용언어학회 23 (23): 17-36, 2007

2 혼다 토모쿠니, "한국어․일본어 거절 화행의 비교 문화 화용론적 연구" 국어교육학회 (43) : 563-595, 2012

3 폴리롱, "한국어 모어 화자와 홍콩 광둥어 화자의 거절 부담감 비교 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 26 (26): 353-386, 2015

4 홍혜란, "폴란드인 한국어 학습자의 거절화행 실현 유형과 특징에 관한 연구 －교차문화적 관점에서 본 정중성을 중심으로－" 한국언어문화교육학회 4 (4): 219-247, 2008

5 황선영, "비교문화적 화용론의 관점에서 본 한국인과 태국인의 거절 화행 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 29 (29): 225-254, 2018

6 이해영, "비교문화적 화용론에 기초한 한국어의 화용 교육" 이중언어학회 (21) : 45-70, 2002

7 융티탄프엉, "비교문화적 화용론 관점에서 본 한국어·베트남어 거절화행에 관한 연구" 언어연구교육원 한국어학당 55 : 157-184, 2019

8 "네덜란드 암스테르담 한글학교"

9 "네덜란드 로테르담 한글학교"

10 장붕익, "네덜란드 국민성과 의사소통 방식" 한국외국어대학교 EU연구소 209-240, 2004

11 "교육통계 서비스 국가별 학교별 외국인 유학생 현황"

12 Kasper, G., "Interlanguage Pragmatics" Oxfrd 1983

13 Beebe, L., M., "Developing communicative competence in second language" Newbury House 1990