RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, we identify risk factors that are likely to occur during the lifecycle of a new product development (NPD) project from the literatures, and identify the three objectives or three constraints that will ultimately be achieved for project success in the ICT industry : performance (scope/quality), schedule (time), and cost. Firstly, we interviewed the project experts to classify the risk factors according that the final project objectives are changeable based on scope/quality, time and cost budget constraints.
Secondly, the survey for pairwise comparisons between the risk factors was asked to the project managers and members who had ever actually participated in the NPD projects of ICT industry to determine the priority ranks on relative importance using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). The risk factors negatively affecting the goals of projects were analyzed by using the AHP respectively in four project stages during the life cycle of the project. The comparison of risk factors within each stage is a different approach unlike the literatures which have covered project’s overall risk assessment. There is an advantage that risk management can be effectively performed with priorities according to each stage from the start to the end of the project. In other words, it is necessary to identify what risk factors will occur in each stage, and to have ideas at each stage with the priorities so that they can be mitigated and eliminated before actual occurrence. As a result, risks on scope & quality changes were found to be the most important considerations for initiative stage of NPD projects in the ICT industry, whereas in the final stage, risks on schedule (time) changes were the most important priorities. Among the ICT industry product categories, ‘communication and broadcasting devices’ and ‘IT and communication based devices’ generally have a high priority in terms of risks on scope & quality changes when initiating the project. At the closing stage of the project, however, considering that schedule (time) changeable risk is getting higher, these products tend to target at B2B market rather than B2C because the new products must be delivered and launched in time as customer firm required.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박영현, "위험형태 실행계획 방법을 활용한 프로젝트관리" 대한경영학회 29 (29): 1549-1564, 2016

2 한상록, "위험요인과 R&D성과 간의 관계: 신제품개발단계별 접근" 기술경영경제학회 21 (21): 165-198, 2013

3 정경수, "소프트웨어 개발 프로젝트의 위험요인도출에 대한 델파이 연구" 한국정보시스템학회 13 (13): 1-20, 2004

4 Griffin, A., "The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time" 34 (34): 24-35, 1997

5 Barnett, B.D., "Technological newness : an empirical study in the process industries" 13 (13): 263-282, 1996

6 Costa, J.M.H., "Systematization of recurrent new product development management problems" 25 (25): 19-34, 2013

7 Tatikonda, M.V., "Successful execution of product development projects : Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process" 18 (18): 401-425, 2000

8 Shi, F., "Study on Risk Evaluation and Preventive Tactics for Product Development" Jungseok Research Institute of International Logistics and Trade 154-161, 2009

9 Cooper, R.G., "Stage gate systems for new product success" 1 (1): 20-24, 1990

10 Olausson, D., "Managing uncertain, complex product development in high-tech firms : in search of controlled flexibility" 40 (40): 383-399, 2010