RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      語彙敎授要目과 中核語彙 = Lexical Syllabus and Nuclear Vocabulary

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to set up some evaluative criteria for basic vocabularies selected by frequency, range, availability, coverage and learnability which W.F.Mackey suggested in 1965.
      Vocabulary selection and the establishment of vocabulary lists for various purposes have been attempted and their validity has been discussed in language teaching. It is certain that the need for valid word lists continues to exist in the field of lexical syllabus.
      So, we language teachers should give heed to appropriate selection of vocabulary, and such selection must be interpreted and evaluated.
      In this study I introduced the concept of vocabulary unclearity as evaluative criteria based on some principles underlying the organization of the vocabulary.
      Competent users of a language generally have recourse to sets of unclear vocabulary in specific contexts such as talking to children or foreigners, writing summaries, etc. Nuclear items might be those having a common semantic feature, or the ability to be linked with other items, or have easily identifiable antonyms. They could also be identified in terms of their neutrality or general in meaning, or of an informal rather than a formal nature.
      Purely linguistic criteria are insufficient to determine basic vocabulary. In conclusion, I suggest that frequency, range, availability, coverage and learnability should be taken as extralinguistic methods for vocabulary selections and that vocabulary unclearity should be taken as pure lingustic criteria for vocabularies selected by extralinguistic methods.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to set up some evaluative criteria for basic vocabularies selected by frequency, range, availability, coverage and learnability which W.F.Mackey suggested in 1965. Vocabulary selection and the establishment of vocabular...

      The purpose of this study is to set up some evaluative criteria for basic vocabularies selected by frequency, range, availability, coverage and learnability which W.F.Mackey suggested in 1965.
      Vocabulary selection and the establishment of vocabulary lists for various purposes have been attempted and their validity has been discussed in language teaching. It is certain that the need for valid word lists continues to exist in the field of lexical syllabus.
      So, we language teachers should give heed to appropriate selection of vocabulary, and such selection must be interpreted and evaluated.
      In this study I introduced the concept of vocabulary unclearity as evaluative criteria based on some principles underlying the organization of the vocabulary.
      Competent users of a language generally have recourse to sets of unclear vocabulary in specific contexts such as talking to children or foreigners, writing summaries, etc. Nuclear items might be those having a common semantic feature, or the ability to be linked with other items, or have easily identifiable antonyms. They could also be identified in terms of their neutrality or general in meaning, or of an informal rather than a formal nature.
      Purely linguistic criteria are insufficient to determine basic vocabulary. In conclusion, I suggest that frequency, range, availability, coverage and learnability should be taken as extralinguistic methods for vocabulary selections and that vocabulary unclearity should be taken as pure lingustic criteria for vocabularies selected by extralinguistic methods.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼