RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      플라톤의 『법률』이 오늘날 법조계(法曹界)에 던지는 메시지 - 적도를 갖춘 ‘자유-우애-지성’의 현대적 해석 - = Messages to the legal profession from Plato’s 『NOMOI』 - A modern interpretation of freedomㆍfraternityㆍ intelligence -

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It seems difficult to compromise with Plato's national system, which presupposes the absolute reality of truth, and the present-day political system, which presupposes the relativity of truth. However, Plato's ideology of the rule of law, which insist...

      It seems difficult to compromise with Plato's national system, which presupposes the absolute reality of truth, and the present-day political system, which presupposes the relativity of truth. However, Plato's ideology of the rule of law, which insists that all members of the community obey the law, and our rule of law, which checks extrajudicial power, have something in common in that they give authority to the substance of the law, not the form of the law. In short, from the point of view of ‘the rule of law’, we can confirm the intersection of the two systems.
      Dating back about 2500 years, This article attempts to examine the meaning of the ideological elements that operate the rule of law from ancient Plato's thought, and how they can be interpreted and applied today.
      Chapter I examines the reason Plato wrote a book titled ‘laws’ and the significance of the rule of law thought as a practical alternative that he suggested after giving up the idea of the rule of iron man. Chapter II analyzes the principle of ‘to metrion and agathon' as a methodology adopted by Plato, and uses the examples of Persia and Athens to apply this as a requirement to operate the rule of law. indicate that they are in a relationship.
      Chapter III examines whether the three-sided relationship of liberty-fraternity-intelligence discussed earlier can be applied to today's lawyers. Among them, freedom, fraternity, and intelligence are reinterpreted and applied in a modern sense to lawyers in the judicial field, especially in line with Plato's method of electing public office. Plato's idea that restrictions on civil liberty is a substitution of public liberty rather than the imposition of public obligations applies to lawyers today. Lawyers need a public sphere which is a space of public liberty to discuss their own public duties. The article concludes by pointing out that this should be prepared.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼