RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    북한 저작권법의 내용 분석과 평가 = 남북한 저작권법의 비교를 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102592511

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The goal of this study is to analyze and assess the contents of copyright Law in North Korea through the comparison evaluation of North and South Korean copyright Law. The major research focused on the copyright legislative system of North Korea which includes the basic, the target of copyright, its right, the comparison of copyright term between North and South Korea and the comparison of their legislative system.
    North Korea has operated the transformed copyright legislative system which accepted the copyright law originated from Capitalist market order and considered their system at the same time. So there exist many of Articles that South Korea can’t understand or not perfectly arranged. We can draw the conclusion which it will not be easy to distribute copyright works with North Korea in this situation. That is, they have continued the contents of copyright law originated from the contradictions inherent in the system.
    For example, it is judged that copyrights are under the supervision of government and they preferentially considered the effect on their system in that the target of copyright works, government’s decision making on the price of copyright works, the absence of public transmission right in property right, 50 years copyright protection period and the counting point of copyright is the time of announcement. Therefore it is analyzed it is far from the universality of global society including the copyright of South Korea.
    We can evaluate it into 3 major categories in this study. First, the difference of the copyright in North Korea, Second, the matters of universality embracing the troubles of opening, Third, there exist much more differences rather than similarities between the copyright of South and North Korea. These matters have suggested that we should seek the point of contact in the copyright exchange and cooperation for the future South and North relationships.
    번역하기

    The goal of this study is to analyze and assess the contents of copyright Law in North Korea through the comparison evaluation of North and South Korean copyright Law. The major research focused on the copyright legislative system of North Korea which...

    The goal of this study is to analyze and assess the contents of copyright Law in North Korea through the comparison evaluation of North and South Korean copyright Law. The major research focused on the copyright legislative system of North Korea which includes the basic, the target of copyright, its right, the comparison of copyright term between North and South Korea and the comparison of their legislative system.
    North Korea has operated the transformed copyright legislative system which accepted the copyright law originated from Capitalist market order and considered their system at the same time. So there exist many of Articles that South Korea can’t understand or not perfectly arranged. We can draw the conclusion which it will not be easy to distribute copyright works with North Korea in this situation. That is, they have continued the contents of copyright law originated from the contradictions inherent in the system.
    For example, it is judged that copyrights are under the supervision of government and they preferentially considered the effect on their system in that the target of copyright works, government’s decision making on the price of copyright works, the absence of public transmission right in property right, 50 years copyright protection period and the counting point of copyright is the time of announcement. Therefore it is analyzed it is far from the universality of global society including the copyright of South Korea.
    We can evaluate it into 3 major categories in this study. First, the difference of the copyright in North Korea, Second, the matters of universality embracing the troubles of opening, Third, there exist much more differences rather than similarities between the copyright of South and North Korea. These matters have suggested that we should seek the point of contact in the copyright exchange and cooperation for the future South and North relationships.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정문성, "지식재산권 분쟁시 바람직한 대체적 분쟁해결 제도(ADR)" 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회 9 (9): 287-297, 2015

    2 사회과학원 언어연구소, "조선말대사전(2)" 1992

    3 사회과학원 언어연구소, "조선말대사전(1)" 1992

    4 최은석, "북한의 저작권법과 남한에서의 북한 저작물 이용 및 쟁점" 법학연구소 11 (11): 231-266, 2009

    5 최경수, "북한 저작권법 및 남북간 저작권 분야교류·협력에 관한 연구" 한국저작권위원회 2015

    6 "북한 저작권법"

    7 류중현, "방송과 저작권-뉴스·영화·드라마·생방송·광고" 커뮤니케이션북스 92-, 2014

    8 "남한 저작권법"

    9 최은석, "남북한 통일을 대비한 저작권법의 기여에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 법무대학원 2011

    10 이은정, "남북교류와 지적재산권의 보호, 남북교류와 관련한 법적 문제점(1)" 법원행정처 2002

    1 정문성, "지식재산권 분쟁시 바람직한 대체적 분쟁해결 제도(ADR)" 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회 9 (9): 287-297, 2015

    2 사회과학원 언어연구소, "조선말대사전(2)" 1992

    3 사회과학원 언어연구소, "조선말대사전(1)" 1992

    4 최은석, "북한의 저작권법과 남한에서의 북한 저작물 이용 및 쟁점" 법학연구소 11 (11): 231-266, 2009

    5 최경수, "북한 저작권법 및 남북간 저작권 분야교류·협력에 관한 연구" 한국저작권위원회 2015

    6 "북한 저작권법"

    7 류중현, "방송과 저작권-뉴스·영화·드라마·생방송·광고" 커뮤니케이션북스 92-, 2014

    8 "남한 저작권법"

    9 최은석, "남북한 통일을 대비한 저작권법의 기여에 관한 연구" 연세대학교 법무대학원 2011

    10 이은정, "남북교류와 지적재산권의 보호, 남북교류와 관련한 법적 문제점(1)" 법원행정처 2002

    11 김명기, "남북간 저작권 상호보호방안연구" 통일부 2002

    12 "www.unikorea.go.kr/content.do?cmsid=1557&mode=view&cid=12567"

    13 Tae-Yoon Park, "Protection South & North Korean Copyrights" Yonsei University, Graduate School of Law 2002

    14 Jae-Woong Lee, "A Study on Legal Issues with regard to the use of North Korean Works" Korea University, Graduate School of Legal Studies 2015

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.79 0.79 0.72
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.67 0.781 0.27
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼