사회비교경향성과 메타인지 정도에 따른 스마트폰 기반 토론 집단의 학습 몰입과 만족 성과 = Learning Flow and Satisfaction Outcomes of Smartphone-based Discussion Groups according to Social Comparison Orientation and Metacognition Degree

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 스마트폰 기반 토론에서 사회비교경향성과 메타인지 정도에 따른 토론 집단의 학습몰입과 만족 성과의 영향을 알아보는 것이다. 참여자 38명에 대한 자료 분석은 다변량분산분석을 활용하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 사회비교경향성 정도가 토론 집단의 학습 몰입에 영향을 주었다. 즉, 사회비교경향성 정도가 높은 집단이 낮은 집단 보다 더 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 사회비교경향성 정도가 토론 집단의 만족 성과에 영향을 미쳤다. 즉, 사회비교경향성 정도가 높은 집단이 낮은 집단 보다 더 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 메타인지 정도가 토론 집단의 학습 몰입에 영향을 주었다. 즉, 메타인지 정도가 높은 집단이 낮은 집단 보다 더 영향을 주는 것으로 드러났다. 넷째, 메타인지 정도가 토론 집단의 만족 성과에 영향을 미쳤다. 즉, 메타인지 정도가 높은 집단이 낮은 집단 보다 더 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로, 사회비교경향성 정도와 메타인지 정도의 상호작용은 검증되지 없었다. 이런 연구결과를 입각하여 사회비교경향성과 메타인지 정도에 따른 스마트폰 기반 토론 집단의 학습 몰입과 만족 성과를 필히 고려해야 할 것이다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of discussion group learning flow and satisfaction outcomes according to social comparison orientation and metacognition degree in smartphone-based discussion. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to analyze data on 38 participants. The results of this study are as follows. First, social comparison orientation degree influenced the discussion group's learning flow. In other words, groups with high social comparison orientation degree were found to be more influential than groups with low social comparison orientation degree. Second, social comparison orientation degree influenced the satisfaction outcomes of the discussion group. In other words, groups with high social comparison orientation degree were found to be more influential than groups with low social comparison orientation degree. Third, metacognition degree influenced the discussion group's learning flow. In other words, it was revealed that the group with a high level of metacognition degree had more influence than the group with a low level of metacognition degree. Fourth, metacognition degree influenced the satisfaction outcomes of the discussion group. In other words, the group with a high level of metacognition degree appeared to have more influence than the group with a low level of metacognition degree. Lastly, the interaction between social comparison orientation degree and metacognition degree was not tested. Based on these research results, it is necessary to consider the learning flow and satisfaction outcomes of smartphone-based discussion groups according to social comparison orientation and metacognition.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 T-W. Kim, "Verification of the effects of learners' metacognition and smartphone addiction on discussion flow and satisfaction" 18 (18): 313-323, 2023

2 T-W. Kim, "Verification of discussion effect according to learner's introvert-extrovert and smartphone addiction degree" 15 (15): 255-264, 2020

3 T-J. Seong, "The simple statistical analysis using spss/amos/hlm" Hakjisa 2019

4 M. Csikszentmihalyi, "The measurement of flow in everyday life toward a theory of emergent motivation" 40 : 57-97, 1993

5 S. J. Lee, "The effects of face-to-face teaching, teacher intervention, and metacognition on academic achievement and interaction in learning through CMC" 9 (9): 95-128, 2003

6 E-M. Cho, "The effect of social presence on learning flow and learning effects in online learning community" 16 (16): 23-43, 2010

7 I-W. Park, "Study on interaction between asynchronism of virtual discussion and participator personality" 14 (14): 25-49, 1998

8 S-W. Kim, "SPSS & AMOS in one volume" Hakjisa 2022

9 H. J. Kim, "Relationships among metacognition, social comparison orientation, perception on team, and participation in online discussion" 18 (18): 1371-1399, 2018

10 F. X, Gibbons, "Individual differences in social comparison : Development of a scale of social comparison orientation" 76 (76): 129-142, 1999

11 T. Chan, "Flow in web-based instructional activity : an exploratory research project" 5 (5): 225-237, 1999

12 P. R. Pintrich, "Eudcational Research and Improvement" 1991

13 S. Y. Park, "Effects of modality and smart device on learner’s interaction experience in online learning" 15 (15): 507-519, 2015

14 J. S. Chung, "Effect analysis of factors related to the learner participation, achievement, and satisfaction in the web-based online discussion" 16 (16): 107-135, 2000

15 J. H. Si, "Discussion-based interface design research on the smart phone at cyber universities" 14 (14): 81-96, 2011

16 T. W. Kim, "Discriminant analysis of factors related to the level of learner participation and satisfaction in the web-based online discussion" 20 (20): 1-20, 2008

17 S. A. Jackson, "Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience : the flow state scale" 18 : 17-35, 1996

18 T-W. Kim, "Analysis of discussion outcome according to learner's self-efficacy and smartphone addiction degree" 16 (16): 329-339, 2021

19 T-W. Kim, "Analysis of discussion flow and participation according to attitude to writing and smartphone addiction" 17 (17): 299-308, 2022

20 Y. J. Ko, "An analysis of discussion using online discussion forum and smartphone" 17 (17): 129-150, 2011

21 H. B. Kim, "A study on the strategies to facilitate debate in smart-learning environment" 17 (17): 79-114, 2011

22 K. Lim, "A case study on a learning with social network services on smartphones : communication contents and characteristics analyses of the applications" 22 (22): 91-114, 2010