RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      유엔의 분쟁 개입과 분쟁 이후의 문제 = The UN’s Intervention in Conflicts and Post-Conflict Issues

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108396972

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      According to a study on the characteristics of a country experiencing ongoing internal strife, the country did not have an easy time getting out of the conflict’s muck. Since a few years ago, they have noticed an increase in external intervention aimed at rebuilding post-conflict and peacebuilding processes in nations like Afghanistan, Columbia, Somalia, and Syria. However we also observed that the dispute recurred in these processes. After the conflict was over, security, development, and humanitarian issues were surely debated.
      The number of conflicts surged during the cold war era and temporarily ended with the fall of the Soviet Union. The UN Security Council made great efforts to intervene and engage in the conflict, and these efforts helped to significantly limit the number of conflicts for 20 years. However, the Arab Spring and die activities of ISIL caused this trend to reverse. The highest point in terms of conflicts occurred in 2020.
      The Security Council has banned the use of military force to overthrow governments, and this type of intervention should be distinguished from those made in the aftermath of a conflict. To maintain global peace and security, the UN charter assigns primary responsibility. Although the UN Charter’s chapter VI only gives limited authority to peacefully resolve disputes, it makes dear how Chapter VII engages in military action. However, when the Cold War ended, the UN Security Council continued to take action even though there was little to no indication that domestic conflict was escalating. They saw civil war and human rights violations as threats to global peace and security.
      In light of this, we should carefully consider the following four factors during the internal conflict transition period. First, the principle should be divided into short-term and long-term interventions since the operational and policy implications can change often before and after a conflict. The transition of conflict will be determined based on how and when it ends, and you will discover the solution as a result Therefore, the intervention starts either in the midst of a fight or after the violence has temporarily stopped. Third, the outcome of the conflict will have significant consequences whether it is resolved militarily or by a peace treaty. The methods of intervention will therefore be chosen in light of the findings.
      번역하기

      According to a study on the characteristics of a country experiencing ongoing internal strife, the country did not have an easy time getting out of the conflict’s muck. Since a few years ago, they have noticed an increase in external intervention ai...

      According to a study on the characteristics of a country experiencing ongoing internal strife, the country did not have an easy time getting out of the conflict’s muck. Since a few years ago, they have noticed an increase in external intervention aimed at rebuilding post-conflict and peacebuilding processes in nations like Afghanistan, Columbia, Somalia, and Syria. However we also observed that the dispute recurred in these processes. After the conflict was over, security, development, and humanitarian issues were surely debated.
      The number of conflicts surged during the cold war era and temporarily ended with the fall of the Soviet Union. The UN Security Council made great efforts to intervene and engage in the conflict, and these efforts helped to significantly limit the number of conflicts for 20 years. However, the Arab Spring and die activities of ISIL caused this trend to reverse. The highest point in terms of conflicts occurred in 2020.
      The Security Council has banned the use of military force to overthrow governments, and this type of intervention should be distinguished from those made in the aftermath of a conflict. To maintain global peace and security, the UN charter assigns primary responsibility. Although the UN Charter’s chapter VI only gives limited authority to peacefully resolve disputes, it makes dear how Chapter VII engages in military action. However, when the Cold War ended, the UN Security Council continued to take action even though there was little to no indication that domestic conflict was escalating. They saw civil war and human rights violations as threats to global peace and security.
      In light of this, we should carefully consider the following four factors during the internal conflict transition period. First, the principle should be divided into short-term and long-term interventions since the operational and policy implications can change often before and after a conflict. The transition of conflict will be determined based on how and when it ends, and you will discover the solution as a result Therefore, the intervention starts either in the midst of a fight or after the violence has temporarily stopped. Third, the outcome of the conflict will have significant consequences whether it is resolved militarily or by a peace treaty. The methods of intervention will therefore be chosen in light of the findings.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼