RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      “있음”의 예술: 르네상스 시대 종교화의 기능적 특성에 대한 연구사적 검토 = Rethinking the Ontological Status of Religious Images in the Renaissance: A Historiographical Perspective

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109734106

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The distinguished German art historian Hans Belting contends that the Renaissance marked a transition from “the Age of the Image” to “the Age of Art.” In the medieval period, religious images were seen as receptacles of divine presence and served as objects of worship. With the advent of the Renaissance, however, veneration shifted toward the artist’s creativity and the image’s aura as an artwork. Belting’s thesis has shaped scholarly discourse over the past thirty years. Yet recent scholarship increasingly emphasizes continuity rather than rupture between medieval and Renaissance religious imagery. These studies argue that the traditional function of the image—as a mediator of divine presence—persisted into the Renaissance.
      Admittedly, Renaissance religious images differed from their medieval predecessors in their emphasis on inventive concepts and technical mastery, which created the visual illusion of encounters with the sacred. A central aim was to render holy figures with lifelike presence through naturalistic techniques. Some works even depicted inanimate images coming to life. Artists also constructed convincing spatial settings—using techniques such as linear perspective and depicting architectural elements like windows and curtains—to make the divine appear present here and now. Figures shown interacting with the sacred offered viewers emotional entry points, particularly when physical contact was depicted. In light of these developments, it is difficult to regard the Renaissance as a complete break from the medieval tradition, as Belting suggests. Rather than a wholly new era, the Renaissance should be understood as a dynamic period of negotiation between continuity and change, between religion and art.
      번역하기

      The distinguished German art historian Hans Belting contends that the Renaissance marked a transition from “the Age of the Image” to “the Age of Art.” In the medieval period, religious images were seen as receptacles of divine presence and ser...

      The distinguished German art historian Hans Belting contends that the Renaissance marked a transition from “the Age of the Image” to “the Age of Art.” In the medieval period, religious images were seen as receptacles of divine presence and served as objects of worship. With the advent of the Renaissance, however, veneration shifted toward the artist’s creativity and the image’s aura as an artwork. Belting’s thesis has shaped scholarly discourse over the past thirty years. Yet recent scholarship increasingly emphasizes continuity rather than rupture between medieval and Renaissance religious imagery. These studies argue that the traditional function of the image—as a mediator of divine presence—persisted into the Renaissance.
      Admittedly, Renaissance religious images differed from their medieval predecessors in their emphasis on inventive concepts and technical mastery, which created the visual illusion of encounters with the sacred. A central aim was to render holy figures with lifelike presence through naturalistic techniques. Some works even depicted inanimate images coming to life. Artists also constructed convincing spatial settings—using techniques such as linear perspective and depicting architectural elements like windows and curtains—to make the divine appear present here and now. Figures shown interacting with the sacred offered viewers emotional entry points, particularly when physical contact was depicted. In light of these developments, it is difficult to regard the Renaissance as a complete break from the medieval tradition, as Belting suggests. Rather than a wholly new era, the Renaissance should be understood as a dynamic period of negotiation between continuity and change, between religion and art.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼