한·중 자동차부품산업의 수출경쟁력 비교 분석 = A Comparative Analysis on the Export Competitiveness of Automobile Parts Industry between Korea and China

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The automobile parts industry is a core industry that has great inter-industry association effects and affects the industrial sector. It is Korea's main export industry, ranking sixth in terms of exports and 36 percent of the surplus. However, exports of automobile parts and surpluses have been decreasing due to internal and external factors such as improved Chinese technology, GVC reorganization, U.S.-China trade dispute, COVID-19, low conversion ratio of electric vehicle parts, and widening technology gap with global parts makers. Therefore, it is time to prepare a plan to enhance competitiveness. Accordingly, this paper analyzed the export competitiveness of related-significant countries, and compared the export competitiveness between Korea and China in the automobile parts industry using Export Market Share(EMS), Trade Specialization Index(TSI), Revealed Comparative Advantage(RCA), Contribution to the Trade Balance(CTB), and Export Similarity Index(ESI) models. The results of the study are as follows. First, the export competitiveness of related-significant countries are high in the order of EMS: Germany > US > Mexico, TSI: Korea > Japan > Poland, RCA: Mexico > Czech Republic > Poland, CTB: Poland > Korea > Mexico. Second, as a result of comparing Korea-China export competitiveness, Korea is more competitive than China, and other automobile parts have the highest competition. Third, when comparing the major trading countries of Korea and China, the United States is the largest export market and surplus partner in both countries. In terms of imports, Korea imports the most from China, and China imports the most from Germany and Japan. Overall, Korea's export competitiveness in the auto parts industry is superior to China and is one of the top in the global market. However, Korea's exports, trade balance, and competitiveness index are on the decline. Therefore, in order to enhance global export competitiveness, structural changes in export products and diversification of exporting countries using FTA and CPTPP are necessary. In addition, policy support such as R&D, source technology, and fostering small parts companies is needed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김지용, "한중 자동차 부품산업의 수출경쟁력 비교 분석" 한국통상정보학회 8 (8): 307-330, 2006

2 김지용, "한미 FTA로 인한 한국산 주요 자동차 부품의 대 미국시장 수출경쟁력 분석" 한국무역연구원 13 (13): 371-384, 2017

3 "한국표준산업분류체계(제10차)"

4 "한국자동차공업협회"

5 하태권, "한국자동차 산업의 국제경쟁력 분석에 대한 연구 : 한·중·일 자동차산업 비교를 중심으로" 부산대학교 대학원 2012

6 "한국무역협회"

7 김태헌, "한국 자동차의 대중국 수출경쟁력에 관한 연구 - RCA, CAC, ESI 지수 비교를 중심으로" 국제지역학회 13 (13): 583-611, 2009

8 김희철, "한국 자동차산업의 대중국 수출경쟁력 분석에 관한 연구" 한국무역연구원 12 (12): 293-310, 2016

9 프레시안, "한국 자동차산업 생존을 위한 다섯가지 대안"

10 조선일보, "전기차 시장 꽃피는데, 중국이 부품산업 싹쓸이할 판"

11 여인만, "자동차산업의 형성과 산업 정책" 역사문제연구소 (122) : 106-134, 2018

12 김경유, "자동차산업 패러다임 변화에 따른 부품산업 혁신성 및 정책과제" 산업연구원 2020

13 김성철, "우리나라 자동차산업의 수출경쟁력과 산업내 무역 분석" 한국산업경제학회 22 (22): 1241-1259, 2009

14 "소재·부품·장비산업 경쟁력강화를 위한 특별조치법"

15 "소부장넷"

16 "대외의존형 산업구조 탈피를 위한 소재부품장비 경쟁력 강화대책: 소재부품장비 공급안정 및 자립화 대책"

17 조선일보, "車부품사 줄줄이 무너지는데 우량기업만 보고 ‘좋아졌다’는 정부"

18 王 景, "中美汽车产业国际竞争力对比分析" 2016 (2016): 113-, 2016

19 丁方方, "中国汽车零部件产业国际竞争力研究" 2010 (2010): 78-80, 2010

20 张 英, "中印汽车业发展及国际竞争力比较分析" 2009 (2009): 78-82, 2009

21 "UN Comtrade"

22 "ISTANS"

23 "IEA"

24 이성아, "An Analysis on the Export Competitiveness of Major Countries for the Export of Automobile Parts in the Chinese Market : Focusing on Korea" 국제e-비즈니스학회 21 (21): 167-186, 2020