RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCOPUS KCI등재

      일 농촌지역 노인의 사회적 지지와 삶의 질

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82696247

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to identify the amount of social support and quality of life perceived by elderly people in rural areas and to examine the relationship between social support and quality of life in an effort to provide the basic data for ...

      The purpose of this study is to identify the amount of social support and quality of life perceived by elderly people in rural areas and to examine the relationship between social support and quality of life in an effort to provide the basic data for effective nursing intervention to enhance quality of life among elderly people. Data were collected from a sample of 220elderly people aged over 60 from a stratified probability method from one rural area in South Jeolla province from Aug. 15 to Sep. 15, 2002. For data collection, pre-educated researchers visited the participants' homes and surveyed them face-to-face. The statistical analysis was performed using the SAS program along with t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson Correlation. The findings were as follows:
      1. The most socially supportive people they answered were spouses (57.28%), followed by children, friends/ neighbors, in descending order. In terms of satisfaction about social support, the subjects felt the most satisfaction from spouses, followed by friends/neighbors, children, in descending order.
      2. The participants' perceived social support was 26.0 and the highest score was 108.0 out of 125. Also, the average score and average grade point was 81.7 and 3.35, respectively. A comparison of the average grade points per items within sub-areas of social support revealed financial aid(3.56), informative support(3.34), emotional support (3.27), and evaluation support(3.22).
      3. Their perceived social support had statistically significant differences in terms of how much they earned (F=18.56, p= .00001) and whether they had family members living together (F=2.68, p=.0512), quality of life had statistically significant differences in terms of how much they earned (F= 35.34, p= 0.00001).
      4. The quality of life they perceived was the lowest score 47.0, the highest score 196.0, average score 145.7, and average grade points 3.28. A comparison of the average grade points per items within sub-areas of quality of life revealed neighbor relationships(3.97), self-esteem(3.49), family relationships(3.35), economic conditions 3.12), physical health (2.98), and psychological health(2.74). 5. The relationship between the amount of the subjects' social support and quality of life was significantly correlated (r= .696, p< .001). The findings revealed that social support for elderly people in rural areas was a reatly effective factor on their quality of life.
      Also, it was shown that the larger the social support for the elderly, the greater the quality of life for them. Therefore, it is necessary to foster geriatric nurse specialists and develop nursing intervention programs connected with health care and social wellbeing in order to enhance the quality of life of elderly people inrural areas. Also, it is necessary to develop effective models for community and its applications, which will play a leading role for elderly people.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 2
      • Ⅱ. 연구 방법 2
      • 1. 연구설계 2
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 2
      • Ⅱ. 연구 방법 2
      • 1. 연구설계 2
      • 2. 연구대상 및 자료수집 방법 3
      • 3. 연구도구 3
      • 1) 사회적지지 측정도구 3
      • 2) 삶의 질 측정도구 3
      • 4. 자료처리 및 분석방법 3
      • 5. 연구의 제한점 3
      • Ⅲ. 연구결과 3
      • 1. 대상자의 인구사회학적 특성 3
      • 2. 대상자의 인지한 사회적지지 정도 3
      • 1) 시회적제공자와 만족도 3
      • 2) 대상자의 기능적 측면의 사회적지지 정도 4
      • 3. 대상자의 인구사회학적 특성에 따른 사회적지지 정도와 삶의 질정도 4
      • 4. 대상자가 인지한 삶의 질정도 5
      • 5. 사회적 지지와 삶의 질과의 관계 5
      • Ⅳ. 논의 5
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 7
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼